Literature DB >> 31790053

Stage 1 hypertension by the 2017 American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association hypertension guidelines and risk of cardiovascular disease events: systematic review, meta-analysis, and estimation of population etiologic fraction of prospective cohort studies.

Minghui Han1,2, Qing Chen3, Leilei Liu4, Quanman Li4, Yongcheng Ren1,4, Yang Zhao1,4, Dechen Liu1,4, Dongdong Zhang5, Feiyan Liu1, Xu Chen4, Cheng Cheng4, Chunmei Guo4, Qionggui Zhou1, Gang Tian4, Ranran Qie4, Shengbing Huang4, Xiaoyan Wu1, Yu Liu2, Honghui Li2, Xizhuo Sun2, Jie Lu4, Dongsheng Hu1,2,4, Ming Zhang1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Epidemiological studies reported an inconsistent association between stage 1 hypertension (SBP 130-139 mmHg or DBP 80-89 mmHg) defined by the 2017 American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association hypertension guidelines and cardiovascular disease (CVD) events. In addition, the proportion of CVD events that could be prevented with effective control of stage 1 hypertension is unknown.
OBJECTIVES: To assess the association between stage 1 hypertension and CVD events and estimate the population etiologic fraction.
METHODS: PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science databases were searched from 1 January 2017 to 22 September 2019. Normal BP was considered SBP less than 120 mmHg and DBP less than 80 mmHg. Hazard ratios and 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs) were pooled by using a random-effects model.
RESULTS: We included 11 articles (16 studies including 3 212 447 participants and 65 945 events) in the analysis. Risk of CVD events was increased with stage 1 hypertension versus normal BP (hazard ratio 1.38, 95% CI 1.28-1.49). On subgroup analyses, stage 1 hypertension was associated with coronary heart disease (CHD) (hazard ratio 1.30, 95% CI 1.20-1.41), stroke (1.39, 1.27-1.52), CVD morbidity (1.42, 1.32-1.53), and CVD mortality (1.34, 1.05-1.71). The population etiologic fraction for the association of CVD events, CHD, stroke, CVD morbidity, and CVD mortality with stage 1 hypertension was 12.90, 10.48, 12.71, 14.03, and 11.69%, respectively.
CONCLUSION: Stage 1 hypertension is associated with CVD events, CVD morbidity, CVD mortality, CHD, and stroke. Effective control of stage 1 hypertension could prevent more than 10% of CVD events.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 31790053     DOI: 10.1097/HJH.0000000000002321

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Hypertens        ISSN: 0263-6352            Impact factor:   4.844


  7 in total

1.  Estimation of Generalized Impact Fraction and Population Attributable Fraction of Hypertension Based on JNC-IV and 2017 ACC/AHA Guidelines for Cardiovascular Diseases Using Parametric G-Formula: Tehran Lipid and Glucose Study (TLGS).

Authors:  Mohammad Saatchi; Mohammad Ali Mansournia; Davood Khalili; Rajabali Daroudi; Kamran Yazdani
Journal:  Risk Manag Healthc Policy       Date:  2020-08-05

2.  Walking for hypertension.

Authors:  Ling-Ling Lee; Caroline A Mulvaney; Yoko Kin Yoke Wong; Edwin Sy Chan; Michael C Watson; Hui-Hsin Lin
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2021-02-24

3.  Hypertension Defined by 2017 ACC/AHA Guideline, Ideal Cardiovascular Health Metrics, and Risk of Cardiovascular Disease: A Nationwide Prospective Cohort Study.

Authors:  Shujing Wu; Yu Xu; Ruizhi Zheng; Jieli Lu; Mian Li; Li Chen; Yanan Huo; Min Xu; Tiange Wang; Zhiyun Zhao; Shuangyuan Wang; Hong Lin; Meng Dai; Di Zhang; Jingya Niu; Guijun Qin; Li Yan; Qin Wan; Lulu Chen; Lixin Shi; Ruying Hu; Xulei Tang; Qing Su; Xuefeng Yu; Yingfen Qin; Gang Chen; Zhengnan Gao; Guixia Wang; Feixia Shen; Zuojie Luo; Yuhong Chen; Yinfei Zhang; Chao Liu; Youmin Wang; Shengli Wu; Tao Yang; Qiang Li; Yiming Mu; Jiajun Zhao; Yufang Bi; Weiqing Wang; Guang Ning
Journal:  Lancet Reg Health West Pac       Date:  2022-01-08

Review 4.  The potential roles of Von Willebrand factor and neutrophil extracellular traps in the natural history of hypertrophic and hypertensive cardiomyopathy.

Authors:  Richard C Becker; A Phillip Owens; Sakthivel Sadayappan
Journal:  Thromb Res       Date:  2020-05-07       Impact factor: 3.944

5.  Impact of the 2017 American Heart Association and American College of Cardiology hypertension guideline in aged individuals.

Authors:  Enayet Karim Chowdhury; Michael E Ernst; Mark Nelson; Karen Margolis; Lawrie J Beilin; Collin Johnston; Robyn Woods; Anne Murray; Rory Wolfe; Elsdon Storey; Raj C Shah; Jessica Lockery; Andrew Tonkin; Anne Newman; Walter Abhayaratna; Nigel Stocks; Sharyn Fitzgerald; Suzanne Orchard; Ruth Trevaks; Geoffrey Donnan; R Grimm; John McNeil; Christopher M Reid
Journal:  J Hypertens       Date:  2020-12       Impact factor: 4.844

6.  Quality Assessment of Published Systematic Reviews in High Impact Cardiology Journals: Revisiting the Evidence Pyramid.

Authors:  Abdelrahman I Abushouk; Ismaeel Yunusa; Ahmed O Elmehrath; Abdelmagid M Elmatboly; Shady Hany Fayek; Omar M Abdelfattah; Anas Saad; Toshiaki Isogai; Shashank Shekhar; Ankur Kalra; Grant W Reed; Rishi Puri; Samir Kapadia
Journal:  Front Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2021-06-09

Review 7.  Nature-Based Interventions for Psychological Wellbeing in Long-Term Conditions: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Eleanor M Taylor; Noelle Robertson; Courtney J Lightfoot; Alice C Smith; Ceri R Jones
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-03-09       Impact factor: 3.390

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.