Traci Jarrett1, Jill Cochran, Adam Baus. 1. West Virginia University School of Public Health, Morgantown (Drs Jarrett and Baus); WVU Clinical and Translational Science Institute, Morgantown (Drs Jarrett and Cochran); WVU Office of Health Services Research, Morgantown (Drs Jarrett and Baus); and West Virginia School of Osteopathic Medicine, Clinical Science Division, Lewisburg (Dr Cochran). The authors acknowledge the nurses and staff at Robert C. Byrd Clinic for their support and participation.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Adequate medication reconciliation is related to patients' safety. Rural populations are at increased risk of adverse drug events due to errors in medication reconciliation and often receiving medical care across multiple health care entities and across long distances with separate electronic medical records. METHODS: This study examined the implementation of Medications at Transitions and Clinical Handoffs Toolkit (MATCH) in a rural primary care clinic and assessed the acceptability and feasibility of implementation. INTERVENTION: MATCH was developed as a workflow process intervention to improve medication reconciliation. RESULTS: Findings from MATCH implementation indicate that the process improved medication reconciliation workflow. A shared definition of current medications across providers and patients was essential. CONCLUSIONS: Empowering patients and caregivers with tools and language to work with providers, particularly nurses, to conduct medication reconciliation during primary care clinic visits is key to improving patient medication reconciliation in rural settings.
BACKGROUND: Adequate medication reconciliation is related to patients' safety. Rural populations are at increased risk of adverse drug events due to errors in medication reconciliation and often receiving medical care across multiple health care entities and across long distances with separate electronic medical records. METHODS: This study examined the implementation of Medications at Transitions and Clinical Handoffs Toolkit (MATCH) in a rural primary care clinic and assessed the acceptability and feasibility of implementation. INTERVENTION: MATCH was developed as a workflow process intervention to improve medication reconciliation. RESULTS: Findings from MATCH implementation indicate that the process improved medication reconciliation workflow. A shared definition of current medications across providers and patients was essential. CONCLUSIONS: Empowering patients and caregivers with tools and language to work with providers, particularly nurses, to conduct medication reconciliation during primary care clinic visits is key to improving patient medication reconciliation in rural settings.
Authors: Daniel S Budnitz; Daniel A Pollock; Kelly N Weidenbach; Aaron B Mendelsohn; Thomas J Schroeder; Joseph L Annest Journal: JAMA Date: 2006-10-18 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Kristine M Gleason; Molly R McDaniel; Joseph Feinglass; David W Baker; Lee Lindquist; David Liss; Gary A Noskin Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2010-02-24 Impact factor: 5.128
Authors: Tejal K Gandhi; Saul N Weingart; Joshua Borus; Andrew C Seger; Josh Peterson; Elisabeth Burdick; Diane L Seger; Kirstin Shu; Frank Federico; Lucian L Leape; David W Bates Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2003-04-17 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Lee A Lindquist; Lise Go; Jori Fleisher; Nelia Jain; Elisha Friesema; David W Baker Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2011-10-05 Impact factor: 5.128
Authors: Sunil Kripalani; Frank LeFevre; Christopher O Phillips; Mark V Williams; Preetha Basaviah; David W Baker Journal: JAMA Date: 2007-02-28 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Kenneth A Wallston; Courtney Cawthon; Candace D McNaughton; Russell L Rothman; Chandra Y Osborn; Sunil Kripalani Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2013-08-06 Impact factor: 5.128