BACKGROUND: This study was designed to determine risk factors and potential harm associated with medication errors at hospital admission. METHODS: Study pharmacist and hospital-physician medication histories were compared with medication orders to identify unexplained history and order discrepancies in 651 adult medicine service inpatients with 5,701 prescription medications. Discrepancies resulting in order changes were considered errors. Logistic regression was used to analyze the association of patient demographic and clinical characteristics including patients' number of pre-admission prescription medications, pharmacies, prescribing physicians and medication changes; and presentation of medication bottles or lists. These factors were tested after controlling for patient demographics, admitting service and severity of illness. RESULTS: Over one-third of study patients (35.9%) experienced 309 order errors; 85% of patients had errors originate in medication histories, and almost half were omissions. Cardiovascular agents were commonly in error (29.1%). If undetected, 52.4% of order errors were rated as potentially requiring increased monitoring or intervention to preclude harm; 11.7% were rated as potentially harmful. In logistic regression analysis, patient's age > or = 65 [odds ratio (OR), 2.17; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.09-4.30] and number of prescription medications (OR, 1.21; 95% CI, 1.14-1.29) were significantly associated with errors potentially requiring monitoring or causing harm. Presenting a medication list (OR, 0.35; 95% CI, 0.19-0.63) or bottles (OR, 0.55; 95% CI, 0.27-1.10) at admission was beneficial. CONCLUSION: Over one-third of the patients in our study had a medication error at admission, and of these patients, 85% had errors originate in their medication histories. Attempts to improve the accuracy of medication histories should focus on older patients with a large number of medications. Primary care physicians and other clinicians should help patients utilize and maintain complete, accurate and understandable medication lists.
BACKGROUND: This study was designed to determine risk factors and potential harm associated with medication errors at hospital admission. METHODS: Study pharmacist and hospital-physician medication histories were compared with medication orders to identify unexplained history and order discrepancies in 651 adult medicine service inpatients with 5,701 prescription medications. Discrepancies resulting in order changes were considered errors. Logistic regression was used to analyze the association of patient demographic and clinical characteristics including patients' number of pre-admission prescription medications, pharmacies, prescribing physicians and medication changes; and presentation of medication bottles or lists. These factors were tested after controlling for patient demographics, admitting service and severity of illness. RESULTS: Over one-third of study patients (35.9%) experienced 309 order errors; 85% of patients had errors originate in medication histories, and almost half were omissions. Cardiovascular agents were commonly in error (29.1%). If undetected, 52.4% of order errors were rated as potentially requiring increased monitoring or intervention to preclude harm; 11.7% were rated as potentially harmful. In logistic regression analysis, patient's age > or = 65 [odds ratio (OR), 2.17; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.09-4.30] and number of prescription medications (OR, 1.21; 95% CI, 1.14-1.29) were significantly associated with errors potentially requiring monitoring or causing harm. Presenting a medication list (OR, 0.35; 95% CI, 0.19-0.63) or bottles (OR, 0.55; 95% CI, 0.27-1.10) at admission was beneficial. CONCLUSION: Over one-third of the patients in our study had a medication error at admission, and of these patients, 85% had errors originate in their medication histories. Attempts to improve the accuracy of medication histories should focus on older patients with a large number of medications. Primary care physicians and other clinicians should help patients utilize and maintain complete, accurate and understandable medication lists.
Authors: David W Baker; Julie A Gazmararian; Mark V Williams; Tracy Scott; Ruth M Parker; Diane Green; Junling Ren; Jennifer Peel Journal: Am J Public Health Date: 2002-08 Impact factor: 9.308
Authors: Kristine M Gleason; Jennifer M Groszek; Carol Sullivan; Denise Rooney; Cynthia Barnard; Gary A Noskin Journal: Am J Health Syst Pharm Date: 2004-08-15 Impact factor: 2.637
Authors: D W Bates; E B Miller; D J Cullen; L Burdick; L Williams; N Laird; L A Petersen; S D Small; B J Sweitzer; M Vander Vliet; L L Leape Journal: Arch Intern Med Date: 1999-11-22
Authors: Jennifer R Pippins; Tejal K Gandhi; Claus Hamann; Chima D Ndumele; Stephanie A Labonville; Ellen K Diedrichsen; Marcy G Carty; Andrew S Karson; Ishir Bhan; Christopher M Coley; Catherine L Liang; Alexander Turchin; Patricia C McCarthy; Jeffrey L Schnipper Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2008-06-19 Impact factor: 5.128
Authors: Alan J Forster; Heather D Clark; Alex Menard; Natalie Dupuis; Robert Chernish; Natasha Chandok; Asmat Khan; Carl van Walraven Journal: CMAJ Date: 2004-02-03 Impact factor: 8.262
Authors: Charles T Taylor; Alex J Adams; Erin L Albert; Elizabeth A Cardello; Kalin Clifford; Jay D Currie; Michael Gonyeau; Steven P Nelson; Lynette R Bradley-Baker Journal: Am J Pharm Educ Date: 2015-10-25 Impact factor: 2.047
Authors: Anna V Medem; Hanna M Seidling; Hans-Georg Eichler; Jens Kaltschmidt; Michael Metzner; Carina M Hubert; David Czock; Walter E Haefeli Journal: Eur J Clin Pharmacol Date: 2017-02-14 Impact factor: 2.953