Literature DB >> 31789096

Cost-Effectiveness of a School-Based Chlamydia Screening Program, Duval County, FL.

Li Yan Wang1, Kwame Owusu-Edusei2, J Terry Parker1, Kristina Wilson3.   

Abstract

During the 2015-2016 school year, the Florida Department of Health in Duval County hosted Teen Health Centers (TeenHC) at five high schools of Jacksonville providing HIV/STD screening and pregnancy testing. The purpose of this study was to assess the cost-effectiveness of the TeenHC chlamydia screening program and determine at what student participation level, the program can be cost-effective. We assessed the costs and effectiveness of the chlamydia screening program compared with "no TeenHC". Cost-effectiveness was measured as cost per quality-adjusted life years (QALY) gained. At a program cost of US$61,001 and 3% participation rate, the cost/QALY gained was $124,328 in the base-case analysis and $81,014-$264,271 in 95% of the simulation trials, all greater than the frequently citied $50,000/QALY benchmark. The cost/QALY gained could be <$50,000/QALY if student participation rate was >7%. The TeenHC chlamydia screening has the potential to be cost-effective. Future program efforts should focus on improving student participation.

Entities:  

Keywords:  chlamydia; cost-effectiveness; school-based STD screening; student participation

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31789096      PMCID: PMC9248761          DOI: 10.1177/1059840519890026

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Sch Nurs        ISSN: 1059-8405            Impact factor:   2.361


  16 in total

1.  Assessing cost-effectiveness in healthcare: history of the $50,000 per QALY threshold.

Authors:  Scott D Grosse
Journal:  Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 2.217

2.  Stay in school? Results of a sexually transmitted diseases screening program in San Francisco high schools-2007.

Authors:  Pennan M Barry; Katherine C Scott; Jacqueline McCright; Ameera Snell; Monica Lee; Trish Bascom; Charlotte K Kent; Jeffrey D Klausner
Journal:  Sex Transm Dis       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 2.830

3.  The Philadelphia High-School STD Screening Program: key insights from dynamic transmission modeling.

Authors:  David N Fisman; C Victor Spain; Melinda E Salmon; Martin Goldberg
Journal:  Sex Transm Dis       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 2.830

4.  The project connect health systems intervention: linking sexually experienced youth to sexual and reproductive health care.

Authors:  Patricia J Dittus; Christine J De Rosa; Robin A Jeffries; Abdelmonem A Afifi; William G Cumberland; Emily Q Chung; Esteban Martinez; Peter R Kerndt; Kathleen A Ethier
Journal:  J Adolesc Health       Date:  2014-05-22       Impact factor: 5.012

5.  Chlamydia screening is not cost-effective at low participation rates: evidence from a repeated register-based implementation study in The Netherlands.

Authors:  G Ardine de Wit; Eelco A B Over; Boris V Schmid; Jan E A M van Bergen; Ingrid V F van den Broek; Marianne A B van der Sande; Robert Welte; Eline L M Op de Coul; Mirjam E Kretzschmar
Journal:  Sex Transm Infect       Date:  2015-03-10       Impact factor: 3.519

6.  Human Immunodeficiency Virus, Chlamydia, and Gonorrhea Testing in New York Medicaid-Enrolled Adolescents.

Authors:  Li Yan Wang; Man-Huei Chang; Gale Burstein; Susan Hocevar Adkins
Journal:  Sex Transm Dis       Date:  2018-01       Impact factor: 2.830

7.  Sexually transmitted diseases treatment guidelines, 2006.

Authors:  Kimberly A Workowski; Stuart M Berman
Journal:  MMWR Recomm Rep       Date:  2006-08-04

8.  Sustained Reduction in Chlamydia Infections Following a School-Based Screening: Detroit, 2010-2015.

Authors:  Richard Dunville; Amy Peterson; Nicole Liddon; Mary Roach; Kenneth Coleman; Patricia Dittus
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2017-12-21       Impact factor: 9.308

Review 9.  Repeat infection with Chlamydia and gonorrhea among females: a systematic review of the literature.

Authors:  Christina B Hosenfeld; Kimberly A Workowski; Stuart Berman; Akbar Zaidi; Jeri Dyson; Debra Mosure; Gail Bolan; Heidi M Bauer
Journal:  Sex Transm Dis       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 2.830

Review 10.  School-Based Sexually Transmitted Disease Screening: Review and Programmatic Guidance.

Authors:  Felicia M T Lewis; Patricia Dittus; Melinda E Salmon; M Jacques Nsuami
Journal:  Sex Transm Dis       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 2.830

View more
  1 in total

1.  Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Michigan's School-Wide Sexually Transmitted Disease Screening Program in Four Detroit High Schools.

Authors:  Li Yan Wang; Amy Peterson; Jingjing Li; Kenneth Coleman; Richard Dunville
Journal:  J Adolesc Health       Date:  2021-07-18       Impact factor: 7.830

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.