Literature DB >> 31788396

Soft Set Theory for Decision Making in Computational Biology under Incomplete Information.

Beatriz Santos-Buitrago1, Adrián Riesco2, Merrill Knapp3, José Carlos R Alcantud4, Gustavo Santos-GARCíA5, Carolyn Talcott6.   

Abstract

The study of biological systems is complex and of great importance. There exist numerous approaches to signal transduction processes, including symbolic modeling of cellular adaptation. The use of formal methods for computational systems biology eases the analysis of cellular models and the establishment of the causes and consequences of certain cellular situations associated to diseases. In this paper, we define an application of logic modeling with rewriting logic and soft set theory. Our approach to decision making with soft sets offers a novel strategy that complements standard strategies. We implement a metalevel strategy to control and guide the rewriting process of the Maude rewriting engine. In particular, we adapt mathematical methods to capture imprecision, vagueness, and uncertainty in the available data. Using this new strategy, we propose an extension in the biological symbolic models of Pathway Logic. Our ultimate aim is to automatically determine the rules that are most appropriate and adjusted to reality in dynamic systems using decision making with incomplete soft sets.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Biological system modeling; Decision making; Rewriting logic; Rewriting strategies; Soft set; Symbolic systems biology

Year:  2019        PMID: 31788396      PMCID: PMC6884365          DOI: 10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2896947

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  IEEE Access        ISSN: 2169-3536            Impact factor:   3.367


  10 in total

Review 1.  Exploring genome space.

Authors:  O G Vukmirovic; S M Tilghman
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2000-06-15       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 2.  Mathematical modeling of gene networks.

Authors:  P Smolen; D A Baxter; J H Byrne
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 17.173

3.  Complexity in biological signaling systems.

Authors:  G Weng; U S Bhalla; R Iyengar
Journal:  Science       Date:  1999-04-02       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 4.  Modeling cell signaling networks.

Authors:  Narat J Eungdamrong; Ravi Iyengar
Journal:  Biol Cell       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 4.458

Review 5.  Rules for modeling signal-transduction systems.

Authors:  William S Hlavacek; James R Faeder; Michael L Blinov; Richard G Posner; Michael Hucka; Walter Fontana
Journal:  Sci STKE       Date:  2006-07-18

Review 6.  Discrete dynamic modeling of signal transduction networks.

Authors:  Assieh Saadatpour; Réka Albert
Journal:  Methods Mol Biol       Date:  2012

7.  Transforming growth factor-beta activation of phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase is independent of Smad2 and Smad3 and regulates fibroblast responses via p21-activated kinase-2.

Authors:  Mark C Wilkes; Hugh Mitchell; Sumedha Gulati Penheiter; Jules J Doré; Kaori Suzuki; Maryanne Edens; Deepak K Sharma; Richard E Pagano; Edward B Leof
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2005-11-15       Impact factor: 12.701

8.  Identification of Smad7, a TGFbeta-inducible antagonist of TGF-beta signalling.

Authors:  A Nakao; M Afrakhte; A Morén; T Nakayama; J L Christian; R Heuchel; S Itoh; M Kawabata; N E Heldin; C H Heldin; P ten Dijke
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1997-10-09       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 9.  Transforming growth factor-beta and breast cancer: Transforming growth factor-beta/SMAD signaling defects and cancer.

Authors:  M Kretzschmar
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res       Date:  2000-02-21       Impact factor: 6.466

10.  Epidermal Growth Factor Signaling towards Proliferation: Modeling and Logic Inference Using Forward and Backward Search.

Authors:  Adrián Riesco; Beatriz Santos-Buitrago; Javier De Las Rivas; Merrill Knapp; Gustavo Santos-García; Carolyn Talcott
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2017-01-16       Impact factor: 3.411

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.