Lauren E Au1, Lorrene D Ritchie2, Klara Gurzo3, Lilly A Nhan4, Gail Woodward-Lopez2, Janice Kao2, Patricia M Guenther5, Marisa Tsai2, Wendi Gosliner2. 1. Nutrition Policy Institute, Division of Agriculture and Natural Resources, University of California, Berkeley, CA. Electronic address: leau@ucanr.edu. 2. Nutrition Policy Institute, Division of Agriculture and Natural Resources, University of California, Berkeley, CA. 3. Department of Public Health Sciences, Stockholm University, Stockholm, Sweden. 4. Department of Community Health Sciences, University of California Los Angeles Fielding School of Public Health, Los Angeles, CA. 5. Department of Nutrition and Integrative Physiology, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: This study determined the extent to which schools adhered to select nutrition and wellness provisions of the 2010 Healthy, Hunger-Free Kids Act and examined differences by US region and school poverty level. DESIGN: Comparison of cross-sectional observational data from the Healthy Communities Study (2013-2015) by region and school poverty level. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 401 US elementary and middle schools. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Adherence with federal nutrition standards for meals and competitive foods; extent of implementation of select aspects of school wellness policies. ANALYSIS: Descriptive statistics and multivariate regression were used. Differences were examined by school poverty level and region, adjusting for other school- and community-level covariates. RESULTS: Most schools reported meeting reimbursable school meal nutrition standards (74%); more schools in the West met nutrition standards (82%) than in the Midwest (64%). Most grains offered at lunch were whole grain-rich (82%), and most competitive foods complied with standards (78%) before they were required. Most schools had a wellness coordinator (80%). Lowest levels of adherence were reported for guidelines for classroom or school event foods. No differences were observed by school poverty level. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS: Findings suggest that Healthy Hunger-Free Kids Act provisions were feasible across a wide variety of schools, and schools successfully implemented reimbursable school meal nutrition standards regardless of school poverty level.
OBJECTIVE: This study determined the extent to which schools adhered to select nutrition and wellness provisions of the 2010 Healthy, Hunger-Free Kids Act and examined differences by US region and school poverty level. DESIGN: Comparison of cross-sectional observational data from the Healthy Communities Study (2013-2015) by region and school poverty level. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 401 US elementary and middle schools. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Adherence with federal nutrition standards for meals and competitive foods; extent of implementation of select aspects of school wellness policies. ANALYSIS: Descriptive statistics and multivariate regression were used. Differences were examined by school poverty level and region, adjusting for other school- and community-level covariates. RESULTS: Most schools reported meeting reimbursable school meal nutrition standards (74%); more schools in the West met nutrition standards (82%) than in the Midwest (64%). Most grains offered at lunch were whole grain-rich (82%), and most competitive foods complied with standards (78%) before they were required. Most schools had a wellness coordinator (80%). Lowest levels of adherence were reported for guidelines for classroom or school event foods. No differences were observed by school poverty level. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS: Findings suggest that Healthy Hunger-Free Kids Act provisions were feasible across a wide variety of schools, and schools successfully implemented reimbursable school meal nutrition standards regardless of school poverty level.
Authors: Erica L Kenney; Jessica L Barrett; Sara N Bleich; Zachary J Ward; Angie L Cradock; Steven L Gortmaker Journal: Health Aff (Millwood) Date: 2020-07 Impact factor: 6.301