| Literature DB >> 31783699 |
Anton Petcherski1,2, Uma Chandrachud1, Elisabeth S Butz1, Madeleine C Klein1, Wen-Ning Zhao1, Surya A Reis1, Stephen J Haggarty1, Mika O Ruonala2, Susan L Cotman1.
Abstract
Alterations in the autophagosomal-lysosomal pathway are a major pathophysiological feature of CLN3 disease, which is the most common form of childhood-onset neurodegeneration. Accumulating autofluorescent lysosomal storage material in CLN3 disease, consisting of dolichols, lipids, biometals, and a protein that normally resides in the mitochondria, subunit c of the mitochondrial ATPase, provides evidence that autophagosomal-lysosomal turnover of cellular components is disrupted upon loss of CLN3 protein function. Using a murine neuronal cell model of the disease, which accurately mimics the major gene defect and the hallmark features of CLN3 disease, we conducted an unbiased search for modifiers of autophagy, extending previous work by further optimizing a GFP-LC3 based assay and performing a high-content screen on a library of ~2000 bioactive compounds. Here we corroborate our earlier screening results and identify expanded, independent sets of autophagy modifiers that increase or decrease the accumulation of autophagosomes in the CLN3 disease cells, highlighting several pathways of interest, including the regulation of calcium signaling, microtubule dynamics, and the mevalonate pathway. Follow-up analysis on fluspirilene, nicardipine, and verapamil, in particular, confirmed activity in reducing GFP-LC3 vesicle burden, while also demonstrating activity in normalizing lysosomal positioning and, for verapamil, in promoting storage material clearance in CLN3 disease neuronal cells. This study demonstrates the potential for cell-based screening studies to identify candidate molecules and pathways for further work to understand CLN3 disease pathogenesis and in drug development efforts.Entities:
Keywords: Batten disease; CLN3; autophagy; neuronal ceroid lipofuscinosis
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31783699 PMCID: PMC6953052 DOI: 10.3390/cells8121531
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Cells ISSN: 2073-4409 Impact factor: 6.600
Figure 1Overview of optimized GFP-LC3 high-content screening assay to monitor the abnormal accumulation of autophagosomes in CbCln3 cells. (a) Representative images of the GFP-LC3 signal in wild-type (CbCln3+/+) and CbCln3 cells and the masked images from CellProfiler, enabling vesicle and cellular counts in 384-well plates. In masked images, nuclei (blue), cell outline (gray), and GFP-LC3 puncta (red) are each outlined. Scale bars = 40 µm. (b) The relative percentages of GFP-LC3+ cells (defined as cells exhibiting ≥5 GFP-LC3 vesicles) in control wells (DMSO only) for wild-type (CbCln3+/+) and CbCln3 cells are shown. Error bars represent standard deviation from the mean. *** p < 0.001. (c) Scatter plot showing the distribution of z-scores for all compounds. “Phenotype enhancers” were those compounds with a z-score of ≥1.5 (data points above line at 1.5 on graph). “Phenotype suppressors” were those compounds with a z-score of ≤−1.5 (data points below line at −1.5 on graph).
Phenotype suppressors from primary high-content small molecule screening (HCS).
| Compound Name | Mean z-Score Cb | % GFP-LC3-Positive Cb | Tested in Dose–Response Secondary Analysis | Fold Change to Lysosome-to-Nucleus Distance, Compared to DMSO (for Reference, DMSO Wild-Type Cells: DMSO Cb |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| lovastatin * | −2 | 9 [11.6] | Yes | 0.91 |
| mestranol (ethynylestradiol 3-methyl ether) | −1.99 | 9.2 | Yes | 0.87 |
| thonzonium bromide | −1.97 | 9.5 | No | 0.86 |
| 20-Carboxy-leukotriene B4 | −1.93 | 10.2 | No | 1.02 |
| estrone | −1.9 | 10.8 | No | 0.98 |
| verapamil | −1.89 | 10.9 | Yes |
|
| fluspirilene * | −1.89 | 11 [16.2] | Yes |
|
| phenamil | −1.86 | 11.4 | No | 1.01 |
| lidoflazine | −1.85 | 11.6 | No |
|
| forskolin | −1.83 | 12 | No | 1.06 |
| methoxy-verapamil | −1.82 | 12 | No |
|
| indirubin-3′-oxime | −1.82 | 12.1 | Yes | 1.08 |
| fluvastatin | −1.81 | 12.3 | No | 0.96 |
| 9(E)-Hexadecenoic acid | −1.71 | 13.9 | No | 0.92 |
| clomiphene | −1.68 | 14.5 | No | 1 |
| nicardipine | −1.67 | 14.6 | Yes | 0.9 |
| methyl benzethonium chloride | −1.64 | 15.2 | No | 1.19 |
| benzethonium chloride | −1.63 | 15.3 | No | 1.07 |
| ethaverine | −1.62 | 15.5 | No | 1.1 |
| proadifen | −1.61 | 15.5 | Yes | 0.94 |
| simvastatin | −1.61 | 15.6 | Yes | 1.01 |
| clofazimine | −1.59 | 16 | No | 0.94 |
| butylparaben | −1.54 | 16.7 | No | 0.95 |
| PP1 | −1.54 | 16.8 | No | 1.05 |
| budesonide | −1.54 | 16.8 | Yes | 1.14 |
| GBR 12909 | −1.54 | 16.8 | No | 0.9 |
| deptropine | −1.54 | 16.8 | No | 0.96 |
| loperamide | −1.52 | 17.1 | No |
|
| damnacanthal | −1.51 | 17.3 | No | 1.13 |
* designates compounds that appeared twice in the hit list, from two independent wells. Bold and italic numbers indicate compounds that induced a fold change in lysosome-to-nucleus distance to wild-type levels.
Phenotype enhancers from primary HCS screen.
| Compound Name | Mean z-Score Cb | % GFP-LC3-Positive Cb | Fold Change to Lysosome-to-Nucleus Distance, Compared to DMSO (for Reference, DMSO Wild-Type Cells: DMSO Cb |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ro 31-8220 * | 3.19 [1.95] | 95.8 [75] | 3.96 [1.27] |
| merbromin | 3.17 | 95.4 | 0.88 |
| ellipticine | 3.17 | 95.4 | 1.44 |
| TPEN | 3.16 | 95.2 | 2.2 |
| MG-132 | 3.08 | 93.9 | 2.6 |
| puromycin * | 3.07 [2.14] | 93.7 [78.2] | 3.24 [1.38] |
| FCCP | 3.06 | 93.6 | 1.28 |
| prazocin | 3.03 | 93.1 | 1.23 |
| Ac-Leu-Leu-Nle-CHO | 3.03 | 93 | 3.11 |
| chelidonine (+) | 3.03 | 93 | 3.41 |
| parbendazole | 3.01 | 92.7 | 6.75 |
| bafilomycin A1 | 2.99 | 92.4 | 0.77 |
| erbstatin analog | 2.99 | 92.4 | 2.73 |
| ikarugamycin | 2.97 | 92.1 | 2.48 |
| manumycin A | 2.95 | 91.7 | 2.09 |
| nocodazole | 2.94 | 91.6 | 3.77 |
| colchicine | 2.88 | 90.6 | 4.26 |
| piperlongumine | 2.85 | 90.1 | 3.43 |
| mebendazole | 2.85 | 90 | 4.29 |
| albendazole | 2.84 | 89.9 | 3.34 |
| taxol (paclitaxel) * | 2.78 [2.5] | 89 [84.3] | 2.04 [5.16] |
| podophyllotoxin | 2.75 | 88.4 | 3.9 |
| chrysene-1,4-quinone | 2.75 | 88.3 | 3.46 |
| tyrphostin 9 * | 2.74 [1.75] | 88.2 [71.8] | 1.23 [1.23] |
| quinacrine | 2.64 | 86.6 | 1.14 |
| penitrem A | 2.64 | 86.6 | 1.59 |
| azacytidine-5 | 2.61 | 86.1 | 1.07 |
| BAPTA-AM | 2.55 | 85.1 | 1.19 |
| arvanil | 2.53 | 84.8 | 1.39 |
| vinblastine | 2.53 | 84.8 | 6.44 |
| thapsigargin | 2.53 | 84.7 | 2.78 |
| azaguanine-8 | 2.52 | 84.5 | 1.31 |
| latrunculin B | 2.49 | 84 | 3.26 |
| methiazole | 2.46 | 83.6 | 3.05 |
| E6 berbamine | 2.45 | 83.4 | 0.84 |
| scoulerine | 2.37 | 82.1 | 2.28 |
| Ala-Ala-Phe-CMK (AAF-CMK) * | 2.36 [1.9] | 81.8 [74.2] | 1.05 [0.89] |
| ciclopirox ethanolamine | 2.3 | 80.9 | 1.45 |
| triciribine | 2.29 | 80.6 | 2.68 |
| actinomycin D | 2.28 | 80.5 | 1.56 |
| maprotiline | 2.24 | 79.9 | 0.84 |
| Hoechst 33342 | 2.19 | 79 | 2.66 |
| TLCK | 2.17 | 78.8 | 1.11 |
| fumagillin | 2.16 | 78.5 | 0.99 |
| triptolide | 2.13 | 78.1 | 2.17 |
| disulfiram | 2.08 | 77.6 | 2.21 |
| AG-879 * | 2.05 [1.97] | 76.7 [75.4] | 2.46 [1.64] |
| SKF-96365 | 2.01 | 76 | 3.23 |
| menadione | 2 | 75.9 | 1.08 |
| shikonin | 1.98 | 75.5 | 0.96 |
| cytochalasin D | 1.96 | 75.2 | 2.44 |
| curcumin | 1.95 | 75 | 0.92 |
| tetrandrine * | 1.93 [1.52] | 74.6 [67.9] | 0.77 [0.85] |
| camptothecine (S,+) | 1.81 | 72.8 | 4.93 |
| hycanthone | 1.81 | 72.8 | 1.15 |
| geldanamycin | 1.75 | 71.6 | 2.56 |
| 5-iodotubercidin | 1.74 | 71.5 | 1.24 |
| wiskostatin | 1.72 | 71.1 | 0.84 |
| trichostatin-A | 1.7 | 70.8 | 1.31 |
| Tosyl-Phe-CMK (TPCK) | 1.69 | 70.8 | 2.75 |
| Z-FA-FMK | 1.69 | 70.7 | 0.94 |
| DRB (NSC 401575) | 1.65 | 70.1 | 1.18 |
| dilazep | 1.64 | 69.9 | 1.01 |
| 6-formylindolo [3,2-B] carbazole | 1.64 | 69.8 | 0.96 |
| CA-074 Me * | 1.63 [1.62] | 69.8 [69.5] | 0.96 [0.9] |
| 2,5-ditertbutylhydroquinone | 1.63 | 69.6 | 1.24 |
| NapSul-Ile-Trp-CHO * | 1.6 [1.59] | 69.2 [69] | 1.41 [0.9] |
| raloxifene | 1.57 | 68.8 | 0.79 |
| piceatannol | 1.55 | 68.3 | 0.92 |
* designates compounds that appeared twice in the hit list, from two independent wells.
Figure 2Validation of effect on GFP-LC3-positive vesicle burden for selected hit compounds. (a) Representative confocal microscopy images of the GFP-LC3 signal (green) in wild-type (CbCln3+/+) and CbCln3 cells, treated for 24 h with fluspirilene (2.5 µM), nicardipine (5 µM), or verapamil (10 µM) (or DMSO as negative control) are shown. Scale bars = 10 µm. DAPI was used to label nuclei (blue). (b) Graphs of dose–response effect on percentage of GFP-LC3-positive cells (squares; left y-axis) and on nuclei count (triangles; right y-axis) in CbCln3 cells are shown. Compound concentrations (µM) are shown on the x-axis. For reference, the mean values for percentage of GFP-LC3-positive cells and nuclei count for DMSO-treated wells are indicated by the solid lines (blue line = DMSO % GFP-LC3+ cells; black line = DMSO nuclei count). Error bars represent standard deviation from the mean (n = 3 experiments, each with quadruplicate wells per dose). (c) Representative blots of CbCln3 cellular lysates are shown, probed with anti-GFP antibody, to monitor autophagic flux upon compound treatments. The GFP-LC3II, GFP-LC3I, and free GFP isoforms are indicated. Molecular weights are indicated on the right of each blot (kDa = kilodalton). The full set of fluspirilene, nicardipine, or verapamil samples, treated with compound alone, or compound plus protease inhibitors (PI) (and controls of DMSO only and protease inhibitors only), were each run on single gels/blots, but intervening replicate wells were cropped out for the figure (full blots with replicate wells are provided in Figure S3). For each compound, densitometric quantification of replicate wells is shown in the bar graphs, for GFP-LC3II levels, normalized to load control (β-actin), and for free GFP levels, normalized to load control (β-actin). In each case, the addition of compound in the presence of protease inhibitors led to a significant increase in GFP-LC3II levels, consistent with an induction of autophagic flux upon compound treatment. Free GFP levels significantly increased in the presence of protease inhibitors, as compared to DMSO control or compound-only. Treatment with compound plus protease inhibitors did not further alter free GFP levels, as expected. Significance in Tukey’s multiple comparison post-hoc test, following one-way ANOVA, is shown (* p < 0.05; *** p < 0.001).
Figure 3Analysis of fluspirilene, nicardipine, and verapamil effects on lysosomes and NCL-type storage material clearance. (a) Representative micrograph images of LAMP-1 immunostained wild-type (CbCln3+/+) and CbCln3 cells following 24-h treatment with fluspirilene (2.5 µM), nicardipine (5 µM), or verapamil (10 µM) (or DMSO as negative control) are shown. Scale bars = 20 µm. Note the altered LAMP-1 vesicle pattern in the DMSO-treated CbCln3 cells, which is shifted toward the periphery of the cells, as compared to that observed in the DMSO-treated CbCln3+/+ cells. Twenty-four hour treatment of CbCln3 cells with fluspirilene, nicardipine, or verapamil shifted the LAMP-1 staining pattern to a more perinuclear distribution. The bar graph represents the percentage of cells with a perinuclear lysosomal distribution pattern of CbCln3 cells for each treatment condition. Error bars represent standard deviation from the mean (n = ~20 images, from four independent experiments). *** p < 0.001 post-hoc analysis following one-way ANOVA. (b) Representative micrograph images of subunit c immunostained CbCln3 cells, following 10-day aging and a subsequent 24-h treatment with the indicated compounds (10 µM, or DMSO). Bar graph represents results of image analysis for mean subunit c deposits/cell for each treatment condition, for a representative experiment (n = 5–7 representative image means). * p < 0.05 post-hoc analysis following one-way ANOVA. (c) A representative immunoblot is shown, probed for subunit c levels in total lysates from wild-type (CbCln3+/+) and CbCln3 cells, which were aged for 10 days and subsequently treated for 24 h with the indicated compounds (or DMSO). An antibody recognizing β-actin was used as load control and for normalization purposes. Bar graph represents relative densitometric quantification of subunit c levels (normalized to β-actin). Data for each condition were normalized to that obtained for the DMSO-treated CbCln3 cells, which was set to a value of 1. Error bars represent SEM (n = 5). * p < 0.05 post-hoc analysis following one-way ANOVA.