| Literature DB >> 31782839 |
Joohyun Lim1, Ghoncheh Kasiri2, Rajib Sahu1, Kevin Schweinar1, Katharina Hengge1, Dierk Raabe1, Fabio La Mantia2, Christina Scheu1.
Abstract
The structural changes of copper hexacyanoferrate (CuHCF), a Prussian blue analogue, which occur when used as a cathode in an aqueous Zn-ion battery, are investigated using electron microscopy techniques. The evolution of Znx Cu1-x HCF phases possessing wire and cubic morphologies from initial CuHCF nanoparticles are monitored after hundreds of cycles. Irreversible introduction of Zn ions to CuHCF is revealed locally using scanning transmission electron microscopy. A substitution mechanism is proposed to explain the increasing Zn content within the cathode material while simultaneously the Cu content is lowered during Zn-ion battery cycling. The present study demonstrates that the irreversible introduction of Zn ions is responsible for the decreasing Zn ion capacity of the CuHCF cathode in high electrolyte concentration.Entities:
Keywords: copper hexacyanoferrate; degradation; electron energy loss spectroscopy; electron microscopy; energy conversion
Year: 2020 PMID: 31782839 PMCID: PMC7187350 DOI: 10.1002/chem.201905384
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Chemistry ISSN: 0947-6539 Impact factor: 5.236
Figure 1(a) Cycle performance of CuHCF cathode in 100 mm ZnSO4. (b) SEM images of wire and cube morphologies which form after 500 and 1000 cycles in comparison to the initial cathode surface. (c) SEM images of the cathode after 0, 50, 150, 250, 500, and 1000 cycles.
Figure 2STEM images and STEM‐EDS mappings of (a) initial CuHCF nanoparticles, (b) wire, and (c) cube morphologies. Core‐loss EELS of (d) Cu‐L2,3,* (e) Fe‐L2,3 and (f) O‐K edges. * Reference EELS data representing Cu0, Cu1+, and Cu2+ are taken from ref. [18].
Chemical content revealed from STEM‐EDS, Fe I(L3)/I(L2) edge intensity ratio obtained from EELS spectra.
|
CuHCF |
Initial nanoparticles |
Wire |
Cube |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Cu (at.%) |
60 |
23 |
13 |
|
Fe (at.%) |
37 |
28 |
28 |
|
Zn (at.%) |
0 |
47 |
32 |
|
K (at.%) |
3 |
2 |
27 |
|
Cu/Fe |
1.6 |
0.82 |
0.46 |
|
I(L3)/I(L2)Fe |
3.9 |
4.4 |
5.6 |
Figure 3STEM images and STEM‐EDS mappings of Cu‐rich area in (a) 500 and (d) 1000 cycled cathodes. White boxes mark where STEM‐EDS is monitored. (b) Selected area diffraction patterns from bright area in (a) and (c) dark‐field image.