Literature DB >> 31781791

Towards grouping concepts based on new approach methodologies in chemical hazard assessment: the read-across approach of the EU-ToxRisk project.

Sylvia E Escher1, Hennicke Kamp2, Susanne H Bennekou3, Annette Bitsch4, Ciarán Fisher5, Rabea Graepel6, Jan G Hengstler7, Matthias Herzler8, Derek Knight9, Marcel Leist10, Ulf Norinder11, Gladys Ouédraogo12, Manuel Pastor13, Sharon Stuard14, Andrew White15, Barbara Zdrazil16, Bob van de Water17, Dinant Kroese18.   

Abstract

Read-across is one of the most frequently used alternative tools for hazard assessment, in particular for complex endpoints such as repeated dose or developmental and reproductive toxicity. Read-across extrapolates the outcome of a specific toxicological in vivo endpoint from tested (source) compounds to "similar" (target) compound(s). If appropriately applied, a read-across approach can be used instead of de novo animal testing. The read-across approach starts with structural/physicochemical similarity between target and source compounds, assuming that similar structural characteristics lead to similar human hazards. In addition, similarity also has to be shown for the toxicokinetic and toxicodynamic properties of the grouped compounds. To date, many read-across cases fail to demonstrate toxicokinetic and toxicodynamic similarities. New concepts, in vitro and in silico tools are needed to better characterise these properties, collectively called new approach methodologies (NAMs). This white paper outlines a general read-across assessment concept using NAMs to support hazard characterization of the grouped compounds by generating data on their dynamic and kinetic properties. Based on the overarching read-across hypothesis, the read-across workflow suggests targeted or untargeted NAM testing also outlining how mechanistic knowledge such as adverse outcome pathways (AOPs) can be utilized. Toxicokinetic models (biokinetic and PBPK), enriched by in vitro parameters such as plasma protein binding and hepatocellular clearance, are proposed to show (dis)similarity of target and source compound toxicokinetics. Furthermore, in vitro to in vivo extrapolation is proposed to predict a human equivalent dose, as potential point of departure for risk assessment. Finally, the generated NAM data are anchored to the existing in vivo data of source compounds to predict the hazard of the target compound in a qualitative and/or quantitative manner. To build this EU-ToxRisk read-across concept, case studies have been conducted and discussed with the regulatory community. These case studies are briefly outlined.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31781791     DOI: 10.1007/s00204-019-02591-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Toxicol        ISSN: 0340-5761            Impact factor:   5.153


  17 in total

1.  Comparing the performance and coverage of selected in silico (liver) metabolism tools relative to reported studies in the literature to inform analogue selection in read-across: A case study.

Authors:  Matthew Boyce; Brian Meyer; Chris Grulke; Lucina Lizarraga; Grace Patlewicz
Journal:  Comput Toxicol       Date:  2022-02-01

2.  The in vitro assessment of the toxicity of volatile, oxidisable, redox-cycling compounds: phenols as an example.

Authors:  Laia Tolosa; Teresa Martínez-Sena; Johannes P Schimming; Erika Moro; Sylvia E Escher; Bas Ter Braak; Bob van der Water; M A Miranda; Barbara M A van Vugt-Lussenburg; José V Castell
Journal:  Arch Toxicol       Date:  2021-05-25       Impact factor: 5.153

3.  Internationalization of read-across as a validated new approach method (NAM) for regulatory toxicology.

Authors:  Costanza Rovida; Tara Barton-Maclaren; Emilio Benfenati; Francesca Caloni; P. Charukeshi Chandrasekera; Christophe Chesné; Mark T D Cronin; Joop De Knecht; Daniel R Dietrich; Sylvia E Escher; Suzanne Fitzpatrick; Brenna Flannery; Matthias Herzler; Susanne Hougaard Bennekou; Bruno Hubesch; Hennicke Kamp; Jaffar Kisitu; Nicole Kleinstreuer; Simona Kovarich; Marcel Leist; Alexandra Maertens; Kerry Nugent; Giorgia Pallocca; Manuel Pastor; Grace Patlewicz; Manuela Pavan; Octavio Presgrave; Lena Smirnova; Michael Schwarz; Takashi Yamada; Thomas Hartung
Journal:  ALTEX       Date:  2020-04-30       Impact factor: 6.250

4.  The EU-ToxRisk method documentation, data processing and chemical testing pipeline for the regulatory use of new approach methods.

Authors:  Alice Krebs; Barbara M A van Vugt-Lussenburg; Tanja Waldmann; Wiebke Albrecht; Jan Boei; Bas Ter Braak; Maja Brajnik; Thomas Braunbeck; Tim Brecklinghaus; Francois Busquet; Andras Dinnyes; Joh Dokler; Xenia Dolde; Thomas E Exner; Ciarán Fisher; David Fluri; Anna Forsby; Jan G Hengstler; Anna-Katharina Holzer; Zofia Janstova; Paul Jennings; Jaffar Kisitu; Julianna Kobolak; Manoj Kumar; Alice Limonciel; Jessica Lundqvist; Balázs Mihalik; Wolfgang Moritz; Giorgia Pallocca; Andrea Paola Cediel Ulloa; Manuel Pastor; Costanza Rovida; Ugis Sarkans; Johannes P Schimming; Bela Z Schmidt; Regina Stöber; Tobias Strassfeld; Bob van de Water; Anja Wilmes; Bart van der Burg; Catherine M Verfaillie; Rebecca von Hellfeld; Harry Vrieling; Nanette G Vrijenhoek; Marcel Leist
Journal:  Arch Toxicol       Date:  2020-07-06       Impact factor: 5.153

5.  Harnessing the power of novel animal-free test methods for the development of COVID-19 drugs and vaccines.

Authors:  Francois Busquet; Thomas Hartung; Giorgia Pallocca; Costanza Rovida; Marcel Leist
Journal:  Arch Toxicol       Date:  2020-05-23       Impact factor: 5.153

6.  Setting the stage for next-generation risk assessment with non-animal approaches: the EU-ToxRisk project experience.

Authors:  M J Moné; G Pallocca; S E Escher; T Exner; M Herzler; S Hougaard Bennekou; H Kamp; E D Kroese; Marcel Leist; T Steger-Hartmann; B van de Water
Journal:  Arch Toxicol       Date:  2020-09-04       Impact factor: 5.153

7.  Neurotoxicity and underlying cellular changes of 21 mitochondrial respiratory chain inhibitors.

Authors:  Johannes Delp; Andrea Cediel-Ulloa; Ilinca Suciu; Petra Kranaster; Barbara Ma van Vugt-Lussenburg; Vesna Munic Kos; Wanda van der Stel; Giada Carta; Susanne Hougaard Bennekou; Paul Jennings; Bob van de Water; Anna Forsby; Marcel Leist
Journal:  Arch Toxicol       Date:  2021-01-29       Impact factor: 5.153

8.  Rapid hazard characterization of environmental chemicals using a compendium of human cell lines from different organs

Authors:  Zunwei Chen; Yizhong Liu; Fred A Wright; Weihsueh A Chiu; Ivan Rusyn
Journal:  ALTEX       Date:  2020-06-08       Impact factor: 6.043

9.  Setting occupational exposure limits for antimicrobial agents: A case study based on a quaternary ammonium compound-based disinfectant.

Authors:  G Scott Dotson; Jason T Lotter; Rachel E Zisook; Shannon H Gaffney; Andrew Maier; Jonathan Colvin
Journal:  Toxicol Ind Health       Date:  2020-09       Impact factor: 2.273

10.  Neurotoxic effects in zebrafish embryos by valproic acid and nine of its analogues: the fish-mouse connection?

Authors:  Katharina Brotzmann; André Wolterbeek; Dinant Kroese; Thomas Braunbeck
Journal:  Arch Toxicol       Date:  2020-10-27       Impact factor: 5.153

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.