| Literature DB >> 31781627 |
Nengneng Zheng1, Renyong Guo2, Yinyu Yao1, Meiyuan Jin1, Yiwen Cheng3, Zongxin Ling3.
Abstract
Vaginal dysbiosis has been identified to be associated with adverse pregnancy outcomes, such as preterm delivery and premature rupture of membranes. However, the overall structure and composition of vaginal microbiota in different trimesters of the pregnant women has not been fully elucidated. In this study, the physiological changes of the vaginal microbiota in healthy pregnant women were investigated. A total of 83 healthy pregnant participants were enrolled, who are in the first, second, or third pregnancy trimester. Quantitative real-time PCR was used to explore the abundant bacteria in the vaginal microbiota. No significant difference in the abundance of Gardnerella, Atopobium, Megasphaera, Eggerthella, Leptotrichia/Sneathia, or Prevotella was found among different trimesters, except Lactobacillus. Compared with the first pregnancy trimester, the abundance of L. iners decreased in the second and third trimester while the abundance of L. crispatus was increased in the second trimester. Moreover, we also found that vaginal cleanliness is correlated with the present of Lactobacillus, Atopobium, and Prevotella and leukocyte esterase is associated with Lactobacillus, Atopobium, Gardnerella, Eggerthella, Leptotrichia/Sneathia, and Prevotella. For those whose vaginal cleanliness raised or leukocyte esterase became positive, the richness of L. iners increased, while that of L. crispatus decreased significantly. Our present data indicated that the altered vaginal microbiota, mainly Lactobacillus, could be observed among different trimesters of pregnancy and L. iners could be considered as a potential bacterial marker for evaluating vaginal cleanliness and leukocyte esterase.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31781627 PMCID: PMC6855029 DOI: 10.1155/2019/6079734
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Biomed Res Int Impact factor: 3.411
Species-specific primer sets for detection of vaginal bacteria by quantitative real-time PCR.
| PCR specificity | Primer | Sequence (5′-3′) | Annealing temp. | Amplicon size (bp) | Reference |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| All bacteria | Bac27F | AGAGTTTGATCCTGGCTCAG | 65°C | 312 | [ |
| EUB338R-I | GCTGCCTCCCGTAGGAGT | ||||
|
| |||||
|
| Bact-0011 | AGAGTTTGATYMTGGCTCAG | 62°C | 667 | [ |
| Lab-0677 | CACCGCTACACATGGAG | ||||
|
| |||||
|
| Lcris-F | AGCGAGCGGAACTAACAGATTTAC | 65°C | 154 | [ |
| Lcris-R | AGCTGATCATGCGATCTGCTT | ||||
|
| |||||
|
| Ljens-F | AAGTCGAGCGAGCTTGCCTATAGA | 60°C | 162 | [ |
| Ljens-R | CTTCTTTCATGCGAAAGTAGC | ||||
|
| |||||
|
| Liners-F | CTCTGCCTTGAAGATCGGAGTGC | 65°C | 155 | [ |
| Liners-R | ACAGTTGATAGGCATCATCTG | ||||
|
| |||||
|
| AV-F | TAGGTCAGGAGTTAAATCTG | 62°C | 156 | [ |
| AV-R | TCATGGCCCAGAAGACCGCC | ||||
|
| |||||
|
| GV1-F | TTACTGGTGTATCACTGTAAGG | 62°C | 332 | [ |
| GV3-R | CCGTCACAGGCTGAACAGT | ||||
|
| |||||
|
| Egger-621F | AACCTCGAGCCGGGTTCC | 60°C | 239 | [ |
| Egger-859R | TCGGCACGGAAGATGTAATCT | ||||
|
| |||||
|
| Lepto-395F | CAATTCTGTGTGTGTGAAGAAG | 60°C | 252 | [ |
| Lepto-646R | ACAGTTTTGTAGGCAAGCCTAT | ||||
|
| |||||
|
| MegaE-456F | GATGCCAACAGTATCCGTCCG | 64°C | 212 | [ |
| MegaE-667R | CCTCTCCGACACTCAAGTTCGA | ||||
|
| |||||
|
| Prevo-F | CCAGCCAAGTAGCGTGCA | 60°C | 151 | [ |
| Prevo-R | TGGACCTTCCGTATTACCGC | ||||
Clinical and laboratory characteristics of the participants.
| Parameters | Participants in 1st trimester ( | Participants in 2nd trimester ( | Participants in 3rd trimester ( |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age (years) | 28.30 (5.35) | 29.50 (3.91) | 29.35 (4.03) | 0.221 |
| Gravidity | 0.88 (0.96) | 1.21 (1.22) | 1.31 (1.62) | 0.604 |
| Parity | 0.55 (0.66) | 0.50 (0.51) | 0.42 (0.50) | 0.832 |
| PH | 4.2 (0.3) | 4.0 (0.2) | 4.1 (0.2) | 0.118 |
| Cleanliness (1–2/3–4) | 18/15 | 23/1 | 22/4 |
|
| H2O2 (<2/≥2) | 5/28 | 0/24 | 2/24 | 0.125 |
| Leucocyte esterase (P/N) | 14/19 | 0/24 | 4/22 |
|
All data are mean (standard deviation). P, positive; N, negative.
Figure 1Comparison of the relative abundance of (a) Lactobacillus, (b) L. crispatus, and (c) L. iners in 83 asymptomatic pregnant women according to their trimester of pregnancy. Data are expressed as scatter plots, in which the horizontal lines illustrate the mean value of each genus-specific bacterium.
Comparison of the relative abundance of vaginal bacteria by quantitative real-time PCR according to trimesters of pregnancy.
| Species | Participants in 1st trimester ( | Participants in 2nd trimester ( | Participants in 3rd trimester ( |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| 31.57 (23.94) | 59.80 (21.96) b | 64.14 (21.61) b | <0.001 |
|
| 0.07 (0.32) | 0.43 (2.07) | 0.27 (1.31) | 0.633 |
|
| 5.74 (10.39) | 13.21 (12.96) c | 9.67 (10.47) | 0.030 |
|
| 14.86 (19.74) | 4.16 (7.97) d | 5.02 (7.24) d | <0.001 |
|
| 1.21 (3.17) | 2.63 (12.86) | 0.03 (0.16) | 0.897 |
|
| 0.10 (0.24) | 0.08 (0.34) | 2.49 (12.67) | 0.944 |
|
| 0.05 (0.21) | 0.00 (0.00) | 0.00 (0.00) | 0.466 |
|
| 0.04 (0.12) | 0.00 (0.00) | 0.00 (0.00) | 0.432 |
|
| 0.29 (0.80) | 0.02 (0.10) | 0.02 (0.09) | 0.569 |
|
| 0.19 (0.45) | 0.00 (0.01) | 0.09 (0.45) | 0.169 |
All data are mean (standard deviation). aThe relative abundance of L. crispatus, L. jensenii, and L. iners was compared to the copy number of Lactobacillus genus; bcompared with 1st trimester, p < 0.001; ccompared with 1st trimester, p < 0.05; dcompared with 1st trimester, p < 0.01.
Correlation of the relative abundance of vaginal bacteria with vaginal cleanliness and leucocyte esterase.
| Vaginal bacteria | Vaginal cleanliness | Leucocyte esterase | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1–2 ( | 3–4 ( |
| Negative ( | Positive ( |
| |
|
| 55.00 (25.14) | 34.10 (27.18) | 0.002 | 55.42 (23.86) | 30.13 (29.06) | 0.001 |
|
| 10.68 (11.91) | 4.27 (8.67) | 0.072 | 10.39 (11.84) | 4.61 (9.09) | 0.241 |
|
| 0.30 (1.53) | 0.02 (0.22) | 0.873 | 0.29 (1.51) | 0.03 (0.47) | 0.220 |
|
| 6.18 (13.04) | 16.56 (16.49) |
| 6.18 (12.79) | 17.73 (17.15) |
|
|
| 0.51 (2.46) | 1.09 (2.57) | 0.044 | 0.49 (2.42) | 1.23 (2.67) | 0.004 |
|
| 0.05 (0.22) | 0.20 (0.43) | 0.133 | 0.04 (0.22) | 0.23 (0.44) | 0.023 |
|
| 0.00 (0.01) | 0.08 (0.84) | 0.194 | 0.00 (0.01) | 0.09 (1.02) | 0.006 |
|
| 0.01 (0.11) | 0.04 (0.21) | 0.496 | 0.00 (0.01) | 0.06 (0.41) | 0.032 |
|
| 0.07 (0.23) | 0.30 (0.75) | 0.686 | 0.06 (0.43) | 0.36 (1.32) | 0.097 |
|
| 0.02 (0.18) | 0.36 (1.46) | 0.004 | 0.01 (0.02) | 0.45 (1.36) | 0.002 |
All data are mean (standard deviation). The abundance of vaginal bacteria relative to total bacteria gene copy number according to vaginal cleanliness and leucocyte esterase was compared. aThe relative abundance of L. crispatus, L. jensenii, and L. iners was compared to the copy number of Lactobacillus genus.
Figure 2Correlation between the relative abundance of genus-specific bacteria and vaginal pH in 83 asymptomatic pregnant women. Relationships among the vaginal pH with (a) Lactobacillus, (b) L. crispatus, (c) L. jensenii, (d) L. iners, (e) A. vaginae, and (f) G. vaginalis are shown as scatter plots and regression lines. The coefficient is taken from Spearman's correlation test.