Literature DB >> 31780995

Asymmetries in the Acceptability and Felicity of English Negative Dependencies: Where Negative Concord and Negative Polarity (Do Not) Overlap.

Frances Blanchette1, Cynthia Lukyanenko2.   

Abstract

Negative Concord (NC) constructions such as the news anchor didn't warn nobody about the floods (meaning "the news anchor warned nobody"), in which two syntactic negations contribute a single semantic one, are stigmatized in English, while their Negative Polarity Item (NPI) variants, such as the news anchor didn't warn anybody about the floods, are prescriptively correct. Because acceptability is often equated with grammaticality, this pattern has led linguists to treat NC as ungrammatical in "Standard" or standardized English (SE). However, it is possible that SE grammars do generate NC sentences, and their low incidence and acceptability is instead due to social factors. To explore this question, and the relationship between NC and NPI constructions, we compared the acceptability of overtly negative noun phrases (e.g., nobody), NPIs (e.g., anybody), and bare plurals (e.g., people), in negative contexts and in conditionals. Negative items were followed by a consequence which supported their single negative meaning, while conditional items were followed by a consequence compatible with the NPI and the bare plural but not the negative noun phrase. Acceptability ratings of the critical NC sentences were reliably lower than constructions with NPIs and bare plurals, but the consequences for all three of these sentence types were rated highly. This reflects an asymmetry in participants' acceptance of NC and their readiness to interpret it in context. A follow-up study with only conditionals revealed that speakers can also find NPIs infelicitous in conditional contexts with consequences that are compatible with a negative interpretation of the NPI, and that negative arguments are felicitous in these same contexts. Taken together, the results support the hypothesis that speakers who do not accept NC have grammars that generate both NC and NPI constructions, and further, that these speakers have two underlying structures for any-NPIs in English.
Copyright © 2019 Blanchette and Lukyanenko.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Negative Concord; Negative Polarity; acceptability; conditionals; experimental approaches; felicity; grammaticality

Year:  2019        PMID: 31780995      PMCID: PMC6861449          DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02486

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Front Psychol        ISSN: 1664-1078


  7 in total

1.  Eye-movements and ERPs reveal the time course of processing negation and remitting counterfactual worlds.

Authors:  Heather J Ferguson; Anthony J Sanford; Hartmut Leuthold
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2008-08-03       Impact factor: 3.252

2.  Processing polarity: how the ungrammatical intrudes on the grammatical.

Authors:  Shravan Vasishth; Sven Brüssow; Richard L Lewis; Heiner Drenhaus
Journal:  Cogn Sci       Date:  2008-06

Review 3.  Aligning grammatical theories and language processing models.

Authors:  Shevaun Lewis; Colin Phillips
Journal:  J Psycholinguist Res       Date:  2015-02

4.  A Note on the Voice Mismatch Asymmetry in Ellipsis.

Authors:  Charles Clifton; Ming Xiang; Lyn Frazier
Journal:  J Psycholinguist Res       Date:  2019-08

5.  Negative polarity illusions and the format of hierarchical encodings in memory.

Authors:  Dan Parker; Colin Phillips
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2016-10-07

6.  The Effect of Negative Polarity Items on Inference Verification.

Authors:  Anna Szabolcsi; Lewis Bott; Brian McElree
Journal:  J Semant       Date:  2008-11-01

7.  Relating (Un)acceptability to Interpretation. Experimental Investigations on Negation.

Authors:  Urtzi Etxeberria; Susagna Tubau; Viviane Deprez; Joan Borràs-Comes; M Teresa Espinal
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2018-02-02
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.