Literature DB >> 21635350

Processing polarity: how the ungrammatical intrudes on the grammatical.

Shravan Vasishth1, Sven Brüssow, Richard L Lewis, Heiner Drenhaus.   

Abstract

A central question in online human sentence comprehension is, "How are linguistic relations established between different parts of a sentence?" Previous work has shown that this dependency resolution process can be computationally expensive, but the underlying reasons for this are still unclear. This article argues that dependency resolution is mediated by cue-based retrieval, constrained by independently motivated working memory principles defined in a cognitive architecture. To demonstrate this, this article investigates an unusual instance of dependency resolution, the processing of negative and positive polarity items, and confirms a surprising prediction of the cue-based retrieval model: Partial-cue matches-which constitute a kind of similarity-based interference-can give rise to the intrusion of ungrammatical retrieval candidates, leading to both processing slow-downs and even errors of judgment that take the form of illusions of grammaticality in patently ungrammatical structures. A notable achievement is that good quantitative fits are achieved without adjusting the key model parameters. 2008 Cognitive Science Society, Inc.

Entities:  

Year:  2008        PMID: 21635350     DOI: 10.1080/03640210802066865

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cogn Sci        ISSN: 0364-0213


  28 in total

1.  Towards dynamical system models of language-related brain potentials.

Authors:  Peter Beim Graben; Sabrina Gerth; Shravan Vasishth
Journal:  Cogn Neurodyn       Date:  2008-04-29       Impact factor: 5.082

2.  Syntax, concepts, and logic in the temporal dynamics of language comprehension: evidence from event-related potentials.

Authors:  Karsten Steinhauer; John E Drury; Paul Portner; Matthew Walenski; Michael T Ullman
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2010-02-04       Impact factor: 3.139

Review 3.  Aligning grammatical theories and language processing models.

Authors:  Shevaun Lewis; Colin Phillips
Journal:  J Psycholinguist Res       Date:  2015-02

4.  Delayed Application of Binding Condition C During Cataphoric Pronoun Resolution.

Authors:  Clare Patterson; Claudia Felser
Journal:  J Psycholinguist Res       Date:  2019-04

5.  When are Downward Entailing contexts identified? The case of the domain-widener ever.

Authors:  Charles Clifton; Lyn Frazier
Journal:  Linguist Inq       Date:  2010-11-01

6.  Abstract linguistic structure correlates with temporal activity during naturalistic comprehension.

Authors:  Jonathan R Brennan; Edward P Stabler; Sarah E Van Wagenen; Wen-Ming Luh; John T Hale
Journal:  Brain Lang       Date:  2016-05-19       Impact factor: 2.381

7.  Interference patterns in subject-verb agreement and reflexives revisited: A large-sample study.

Authors:  Lena A Jäger; Daniela Mertzen; Julie A Van Dyke; Shravan Vasishth
Journal:  J Mem Lang       Date:  2019-12-10       Impact factor: 3.059

8.  Teasing apart retrieval and encoding interference in the processing of anaphors.

Authors:  Lena A Jäger; Lena Benz; Jens Roeser; Brian W Dillon; Shravan Vasishth
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2015-06-09

9.  Interference in the processing of adjunct control.

Authors:  Dan Parker; Sol Lago; Colin Phillips
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2015-09-08

10.  Dependency-dependent interference: NPI interference, agreement attraction, and global pragmatic inferences.

Authors:  Ming Xiang; Julian Grove; Anastasia Giannakidou
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2013-10-07
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.