Literature DB >> 31780402

QTc Interval-Prolonging Medications Among Patients With Lung Cancer: Implications for Clinical Trial Eligibility and Clinical Care.

Tri Le1, Hui Yang2, Sawsan Rashdan3, Mark S Link4, Vlad G Zaha4, Carlos Alvarez5, David E Gerber6.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Concomitant medication use, including agents that prolong the corrected QT (QTc) interval, can result in the exclusion of patients with cancer from clinical trials. To estimate the potential effects on accrual, we determined the prevalence of QTc-prolonging medication prescriptions in a national patient cohort. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We identified adult patients in the Veterans Affairs system with a diagnosis of lung cancer from 2003 to 2016. The use of QTc interval-prolonging medications and risk category were obtained from CredibleMeds. We calculated the prevalence of prescriptions for QTc-prolonging medications with a known or possible risk of torsade de pointes in the 3 months up to and including the date of cancer diagnosis. The rates across patient groups were compared using χ2 test.
RESULTS: A total of 280,068 patients were included in the present study. The mean age was 70 years, 98% were male, and 72% were white. Overall, 28.4% had been prescribed a QTc-prolonging medication, and 7.3% had been prescribed ≥2 in the 3 months before the cancer diagnosis. The most commonly prescribed QTc-prolonging medications were antimicrobial agents (14.0%), psychiatric agents (10.2%), antiemetic agents (2.6%), and cardiac medications (1.7%). Excluding the antimicrobial agents, 18.4% of the patients had been prescribed a QTc-prolonging medication.
CONCLUSIONS: A substantial proportion of individuals with lung cancer will be prescribed QTc-prolonging medications. These prescriptions can limit patients' eligibility for clinical trials and complicate the administration of standard cancer therapies. Further research into the actual clinical risks and optimal management of QTc-prolonging medications in cancer populations is warranted.
Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Clinical research; Exclusion criteria; Oncocardiology; Targeted therapy; Thoracic oncology

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31780402      PMCID: PMC6937372          DOI: 10.1016/j.cllc.2019.07.008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Lung Cancer        ISSN: 1525-7304            Impact factor:   4.785


  44 in total

1.  Reasons for underuse of recommended therapies for colorectal and lung cancer in the Veterans Health Administration.

Authors:  Mary Beth Landrum; Nancy L Keating; Elizabeth B Lamont; Samuel R Bozeman; Barbara J McNeil
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2011-11-09       Impact factor: 6.860

2.  Effect of prior cancer on outcomes in advanced lung cancer: implications for clinical trial eligibility and accrual.

Authors:  Andrew L Laccetti; Sandi L Pruitt; Lei Xuan; Ethan A Halm; David E Gerber
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2015-02-09       Impact factor: 13.506

3.  National Cancer Institute sponsored cooperative clinical trials.

Authors:  M A Friedman; D F Cain
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1990-05-15       Impact factor: 6.860

4.  Risk of Cardiac Events Associated With Antidepressant Therapy in Patients With Long QT Syndrome.

Authors:  Meng Wang; Barbara Szepietowska; Bronislava Polonsky; Scott McNitt; Arthur J Moss; Wojciech Zareba; David S Auerbach
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  2017-11-13       Impact factor: 2.778

5.  Underrepresentation of patients 65 years of age or older in cancer-treatment trials.

Authors:  L F Hutchins; J M Unger; J J Crowley; C A Coltman; K S Albain
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1999-12-30       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 6.  Systematic review of barriers to the recruitment of older patients with cancer onto clinical trials.

Authors:  Carol A Townsley; Rita Selby; Lillian L Siu
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2005-05-01       Impact factor: 44.544

7.  Prospective evaluation of cancer clinical trial accrual patterns: identifying potential barriers to enrollment.

Authors:  P N Lara; R Higdon; N Lim; K Kwan; M Tanaka; D H Lau; T Wun; J Welborn; F J Meyers; S Christensen; R O'Donnell; C Richman; S A Scudder; J Tuscano; D R Gandara; K S Lam
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2001-03-15       Impact factor: 44.544

8.  Long-term proarrhythmic pharmacotherapy among patients with congenital long QT syndrome and risk of arrhythmia and mortality.

Authors:  Peter E Weeke; Jesper S Kellemann; Camilla Bang Jespersen; Juliane Theilade; Jørgen K Kanters; Michael Skov Hansen; Michael Christiansen; Peter Marstrand; Gunnar H Gislason; Christian Torp-Pedersen; Henning Bundgaard; Henrik K Jensen; Jacob Tfelt-Hansen
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  2019-10-01       Impact factor: 29.983

9.  How sociodemographics, presence of oncology specialists, and hospital cancer programs affect accrual to cancer treatment trials.

Authors:  Warren B Sateren; Edward L Trimble; Jeffrey Abrams; Otis Brawley; Nancy Breen; Leslie Ford; Mary McCabe; Richard Kaplan; Malcolm Smith; Richard Ungerleider; Michaele C Christian
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2002-04-15       Impact factor: 44.544

10.  Broadening Eligibility Criteria to Make Clinical Trials More Representative: American Society of Clinical Oncology and Friends of Cancer Research Joint Research Statement.

Authors:  Edward S Kim; Suanna S Bruinooge; Samantha Roberts; Gwynn Ison; Nancy U Lin; Lia Gore; Thomas S Uldrick; Stuart M Lichtman; Nancy Roach; Julia A Beaver; Rajeshwari Sridhara; Paul J Hesketh; Andrea M Denicoff; Elizabeth Garrett-Mayer; Eric Rubin; Pratik Multani; Tatiana M Prowell; Caroline Schenkel; Marina Kozak; Jeff Allen; Ellen Sigal; Richard L Schilsky
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2017-10-02       Impact factor: 44.544

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.