Literature DB >> 31778964

Automated measurement of liver attenuation to identify moderate-to-severe hepatic steatosis from chest CT scans.

Artit Jirapatnakul1, Anthony P Reeves2, Sara Lewis1, Xiangmeng Chen3, Teng Ma4, Rowena Yip1, Xing Chin1, Shuang Liu2, Ponni V Perumalswami5, David F Yankelevitz1, Michael Crane6, Andrea D Branch5, Claudia I Henschke7.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Develop and validate an automated method for measuring liver attenuation in non-contrast low-dose chest CT (LDCT) scans and compare it to the standard manual method for identifying moderate-to-severe hepatic steatosis (HS).
METHOD: The automated method identifies a region below the right lung within the liver and uses statistical sampling techniques to exclude non-liver parenchyma. The method was used to assess moderate-to-severe HS on two IRB-approved cohorts: 1) 24 patients with liver disease examined between 1/2013-1/2017 with non-contrast chest CT and abdominal MRI scans obtained within three months of liver biopsy, and 2) 319 lung screening participants with baseline LDCT performed between 8/2011-1/2017. Agreement between the manual and automated CT methods, the manual MRI method, and pathology for determining moderate-to-severe HS was assessed using Cohen's Kappa by applying a 40 HU threshold to the CT method and 17.4% fat fraction to MRI. Agreement between the manual and automated CT methods was assessed using the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). Variability was assessed using Bland-Altman limits of agreement (LoA).
RESULTS: In the first cohort, the manual and automated CT methods had almost perfect agreement (ICC = 0.97, κ = 1.00) with LoA of -7.6 to 4.7 HU. Both manual and automated CT methods had almost perfect agreement with MRI (κ = 0.90) and substantial agreement with pathology (κ = 0.77). In the second cohort, the manual and automated CT methods had almost perfect agreement (ICC = 0.94, κ = 0.87). LoA were -10.6 to 5.2 HU.
CONCLUSION: Automated measurements of liver attenuation from LDCT scans can be used to identify moderate-to-severe HS on LDCT.
Copyright © 2019 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Hepatic steatosis; Image analysis; Low-dose CT; Lung screening

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31778964      PMCID: PMC7179816          DOI: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2019.108723

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Radiol        ISSN: 0720-048X            Impact factor:   3.528


  37 in total

1.  Liver anatomy: portal (and suprahepatic) or biliary segmentation.

Authors:  C Couinaud
Journal:  Dig Surg       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 2.588

2.  Protocol for the examination of specimens from patients with carcinoma of the intrahepatic bile ducts.

Authors:  Mary Kay Washington; Jordan Berlin; Philip A Branton; Lawrence J Burgart; David K Carter; Carolyn C Compton; Wendy L Frankel; J Milburn Jessup; Sanjay Kakar; Bruce Minsky; Raouf E Nakhleh; Jean-Nicolas Vauthey
Journal:  Arch Pathol Lab Med       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 5.534

3.  Automated detection of small pulmonary nodules in whole lung CT scans.

Authors:  Andinet A Enquobahrie; Anthony P Reeves; David F Yankelevitz; Claudia I Henschke
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 3.173

4.  Protocol for measurement of liver fat by computed tomography.

Authors:  Lance E Davidson; Jennifer L Kuk; Timothy S Church; Robert Ross
Journal:  J Appl Physiol (1985)       Date:  2005-11-17

5.  Automated segmentation and quantification of liver and spleen from CT images using normalized probabilistic atlases and enhancement estimation.

Authors:  Marius George Linguraru; Jesse K Sandberg; Zhixi Li; Furhawn Shah; Ronald M Summers
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 4.071

6.  Volumetric quantitative histogram analysis using diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging to differentiate HCC from other primary liver cancers.

Authors:  Sara Lewis; Steven Peti; Stefanie J Hectors; Michael King; Ally Rosen; Amita Kamath; Juan Putra; Swan Thung; Bachir Taouli
Journal:  Abdom Radiol (NY)       Date:  2019-03

7.  Biopsy-proven nonsteatotic liver in adults: estimation of reference range for difference in attenuation between the liver and the spleen at nonenhanced CT.

Authors:  Yang Shin Park; Seong Ho Park; Seung Soo Lee; Dae Yoon Kim; Yong Moon Shin; Woochang Lee; Sung-Gyu Lee; Eun Sil Yu
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2011-01-06       Impact factor: 11.105

8.  Computed tomography scans in the evaluation of fatty liver disease in a population based study: the multi-ethnic study of atherosclerosis.

Authors:  Irfan Zeb; Dong Li; Khurram Nasir; Ronit Katz; Vahid N Larijani; Matthew J Budoff
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2012-04-21       Impact factor: 3.173

9.  The diagnostic accuracy of US, CT, MRI and 1H-MRS for the evaluation of hepatic steatosis compared with liver biopsy: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Anneloes E Bohte; Jochem R van Werven; Shandra Bipat; Jaap Stoker
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2010-07-31       Impact factor: 5.315

10.  Macrovesicular hepatic steatosis in living liver donors: use of CT for quantitative and qualitative assessment.

Authors:  Seong Ho Park; Pyo Nyun Kim; Kyoung Won Kim; Sang Won Lee; Seong Eon Yoon; Sung Won Park; Hyun Kwon Ha; Moon-Gyu Lee; Shin Hwang; Sung-Gyu Lee; Eun Sil Yu; Eun Yoon Cho
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2006-02-16       Impact factor: 11.105

View more
  2 in total

Review 1.  Added benefits of early detection of other diseases on low-dose CT screening.

Authors:  Rowena Yip; Artit Jirapatnakul; Minxia Hu; Xiangmeng Chen; Dan Han; Teng Ma; Yeqing Zhu; Mary M Salvatore; Laurie R Margolies; David F Yankelevitz; Claudia I Henschke
Journal:  Transl Lung Cancer Res       Date:  2021-02

2.  The potential risk factors of early-onset post-stroke depression from immuno-inflammatory perspective.

Authors:  Hengshu Chen; Fan Liu; Dongren Sun; Jingyuan Zhang; Shihang Luo; Qiao Liao; Fafa Tian
Journal:  Front Immunol       Date:  2022-09-26       Impact factor: 8.786

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.