RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES: Fatty liver disease is a common clinical entity in hepatology practice. This study evaluates the prevalence and reproducibility of computed tomography (CT) measures for diagnosis of fatty liver and compares commonly used CT criteria for the diagnosis of liver fat. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study includes 6814 asymptomatic participants from a population-based sample. The ratio of liver-to-spleen (L/S) Hounsfield units (HU) <1.0 and liver attenuation <40 HU were used for diagnosing and assessing the severity of liver fat content. Participants with heavy alcohol intake (>7 drinks/week for women and >14 drinks/week for men) were excluded. Final analysis was performed on participants where images of both liver and spleen were available on the scans. RESULTS: The overall prevalence of fatty liver (4175 subjects included in final analysis) was 17.2% (using L/S ratio <1.0), with 6.3% (with <40 HU cutoff) of the population having moderate to severe steatosis (>30% liver fat content). The prevalence was high in participants with dyslipidemia (70.4%), hypertension (56.8%), and obesity (53%). Diabetic patients had 24.1% prevalence of fatty liver. The prevalence provided by L/S ratio <1.0 (17.2%) was comparable to prevalence provided by <51 HU (17.3%), whereas prevalence obtained by <40 HU (6.3%) cutoff corresponded to L/S ratio of <0.8 (6.5%). The measurements of liver and spleen HU attenuations were highly reproducible (0.96, 0.99 and 0.99, 0.99 for intra- and inter-reader variability, respectively) in a sample of 100 scans. CONCLUSION: Fatty liver can be reliably diagnosed using nonenhanced CT scans.
RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES:Fatty liver disease is a common clinical entity in hepatology practice. This study evaluates the prevalence and reproducibility of computed tomography (CT) measures for diagnosis of fatty liver and compares commonly used CT criteria for the diagnosis of liver fat. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study includes 6814 asymptomatic participants from a population-based sample. The ratio of liver-to-spleen (L/S) Hounsfield units (HU) <1.0 and liver attenuation <40 HU were used for diagnosing and assessing the severity of liver fat content. Participants with heavy alcohol intake (>7 drinks/week for women and >14 drinks/week for men) were excluded. Final analysis was performed on participants where images of both liver and spleen were available on the scans. RESULTS: The overall prevalence of fatty liver (4175 subjects included in final analysis) was 17.2% (using L/S ratio <1.0), with 6.3% (with <40 HU cutoff) of the population having moderate to severe steatosis (>30% liver fat content). The prevalence was high in participants with dyslipidemia (70.4%), hypertension (56.8%), and obesity (53%). Diabeticpatients had 24.1% prevalence of fatty liver. The prevalence provided by L/S ratio <1.0 (17.2%) was comparable to prevalence provided by <51 HU (17.3%), whereas prevalence obtained by <40 HU (6.3%) cutoff corresponded to L/S ratio of <0.8 (6.5%). The measurements of liver and spleen HU attenuations were highly reproducible (0.96, 0.99 and 0.99, 0.99 for intra- and inter-reader variability, respectively) in a sample of 100 scans. CONCLUSION:Fatty liver can be reliably diagnosed using nonenhanced CT scans.
Authors: Cody J Boyce; Perry J Pickhardt; David H Kim; Andrew J Taylor; Thomas C Winter; Richard J Bruce; Mary J Lindstrom; J Louis Hinshaw Journal: AJR Am J Roentgenol Date: 2010-03 Impact factor: 3.959
Authors: Seung Soo Lee; Seong Ho Park; Hye Jin Kim; So Yeon Kim; Min-Yeong Kim; Dae Yoon Kim; Dong Jin Suh; Kang Mo Kim; Mi Hyun Bae; Joo Yeon Lee; Sung-Gyu Lee; Eun Sil Yu Journal: J Hepatol Date: 2010-02-02 Impact factor: 25.083
Authors: Jeffrey D Browning; Lidia S Szczepaniak; Robert Dobbins; Pamela Nuremberg; Jay D Horton; Jonathan C Cohen; Scott M Grundy; Helen H Hobbs Journal: Hepatology Date: 2004-12 Impact factor: 17.425
Authors: Diane E Bild; David A Bluemke; Gregory L Burke; Robert Detrano; Ana V Diez Roux; Aaron R Folsom; Philip Greenland; David R Jacob; Richard Kronmal; Kiang Liu; Jennifer Clark Nelson; Daniel O'Leary; Mohammed F Saad; Steven Shea; Moyses Szklo; Russell P Tracy Journal: Am J Epidemiol Date: 2002-11-01 Impact factor: 4.897
Authors: Stefan B Puchner; Michael T Lu; Thomas Mayrhofer; Ting Liu; Amit Pursnani; Brian B Ghoshhajra; Quynh A Truong; Stephen D Wiviott; Jerome L Fleg; Udo Hoffmann; Maros Ferencik Journal: Radiology Date: 2014-11-04 Impact factor: 11.105
Authors: Samar R El Khoudary; Saad Samargandy; Irfan Zeb; Temitope Foster; Ian H de Boer; Dong Li; Matthew J Budoff Journal: Nutr Metab Cardiovasc Dis Date: 2019-09-10 Impact factor: 4.222
Authors: Veeral H Ajmera; Norah A Terrault; Lisa B VanWagner; Monika Sarkar; Cora E Lewis; John J Carr; Erica P Gunderson Journal: J Hepatol Date: 2018-11-01 Impact factor: 25.083
Authors: Yuankai Huo; James G Terry; Jiachen Wang; Sangeeta Nair; Thomas A Lasko; Barry I Freedman; J Jeffery Carr; Bennett A Landman Journal: Med Phys Date: 2019-07-05 Impact factor: 4.071
Authors: Lisa B VanWagner; Hongyan Ning; Cora E Lewis; Christina M Shay; John Wilkins; J Jeffrey Carr; James G Terry; Donald M Lloyd-Jones; David R Jacobs; Mercedes R Carnethon Journal: Atherosclerosis Date: 2014-06-10 Impact factor: 5.162
Authors: Ravi V Shah; Matthew A Allison; João A C Lima; David A Bluemke; Siddique A Abbasi; Pamela Ouyang; Michael Jerosch-Herold; Jingzhong Ding; Matthew J Budoff; Venkatesh L Murthy Journal: Atherosclerosis Date: 2015-07-15 Impact factor: 5.162
Authors: Artit Jirapatnakul; Anthony P Reeves; Sara Lewis; Xiangmeng Chen; Teng Ma; Rowena Yip; Xing Chin; Shuang Liu; Ponni V Perumalswami; David F Yankelevitz; Michael Crane; Andrea D Branch; Claudia I Henschke Journal: Eur J Radiol Date: 2019-10-25 Impact factor: 3.528