| Literature DB >> 31777742 |
Neda Ezzeddin1, Rosa Zavoshy2, Mostafa Noroozi3.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study is to assess the prevalence and determinants of folic acid supplementation among women referred to community health centers.Entities:
Keywords: Contraception; Economic conditions; Folic acid; Food security
Year: 2019 PMID: 31777742 PMCID: PMC6856478 DOI: 10.5468/ogs.2019.62.6.454
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Obstet Gynecol Sci ISSN: 2287-8572
Classification of the Household food security status based on scores
| Food security status | Number of positive responses | |
|---|---|---|
| Households without children under 18 years (total score:10) | Households with children under 18 years (total score:18) | |
| Food secure | 0–2 | 0–2 |
| Food insecure without hunger | 3–5 | 3–7 |
| Food insecure with moderate hunger | 6–8 | 8–12 |
| Food insecure with severe hunger | 9–10 | 13–18 |
The association of folic acid supplementation with qualitative variables
| Variables | Folic acid supplementation | OR | 95% CI | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yes | No | Total | |||||
| Employment status of women | <0.05 | ||||||
| Employment | 30 (16.9) | 14 (9.5) | 44 (13.5) | 1.953 | 0.993–3.841 | ||
| Housekeepers | 147 (83.1) | 134 (90.5) | 281 (86.5) | ||||
| Total | 177 (100) | 148 (100) | 325 (100) | ||||
| Employment status of husbands | NS | ||||||
| Self-employed | 119 (67.6) | 100 (68.5) | 219 (68) | 0.96 | 0.600–1.538 | ||
| Government employee | 57 (32.4) | 46 (31.5) | 103 (32) | ||||
| Totala) | 176 (100) | 146 (100) | 322 (100) | ||||
| The education levels of women | <0.001 | ||||||
| Under diploma | 24 (13.6) | 47 (31.8) | 71 (21.8) | 2.967 | 1.708–5.153 | ||
| Diploma or higher | 153 (86.4) | 101 (68.2) | 254 (78.2) | ||||
| Totala) | 177 (100) | 148 (100) | 325 (100) | ||||
| The education levels of husbands | <0.001 | ||||||
| Under diploma | 30 (16.9) | 53 (35.8) | 83 (25.5) | 2.734 | 1.630–4.584 | ||
| Diploma or higher | 147 (83.1) | 95 (64.2) | 242 (74.5) | ||||
| Total | 177 (100) | 148 (100) | 325 (100) | ||||
| Unplanned pregnancy | <0.001 | ||||||
| No | 170 (96) | 88 (59.5) | 258 (79.4) | 0.06 | 0.026–0.138 | ||
| Yes | 7 (4) | 60 (40.5) | 67 (20.6) | ||||
| Total | 177 (100) | 148 (100) | 325 (100) | ||||
| Household Food Security status | <0.05 | ||||||
| Food secure | 131 (74) | 83 (56.1) | 214 (65.8) | - | - | ||
| Food insecure without hunger | 26 (14.7) | 30 (20.3) | 56 (17.2) | ||||
| Food insecure with hunger | 20 (11.3) | 35 (23.6) | 55 (16.9) | ||||
| Total | 177 (100) | 148 (100) | 325 (100) | ||||
Values are presented as number of patients (%).
OR, odds ratio; CI, confidence interval; NS, not significant.
a)Missing data (n=3); b)χ2 test.
The association of folic acid supplementation with quantitative variables
| Variables | SE | OR | 95% CI | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Women age | 0.020 | 0.993 | 0.955–1.032 | NS |
| Husbands age | 0.019 | 0.979 | 0.944–1.016 | NS |
| Economic satisfaction score | 0.063 | 1.128 | 0.996–1.278 | NS |
| Pregnancy number | 0.120 | 0.781 | 0.617–0.989 | <0.05 |
SE, standard error; OR, odds ratio; CI, confidence interval; NS, not significant.
a)Logistic regression.
Final logistic regression model for the predictors of folic acid supplementation
| Variables | SE | OR | 95% CI | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Women age | 0.047 | 0.989 | 0.901–1.085 | NS | |
| Husbands age | 0.044 | 1.015 | 0.932–1.107 | NS | |
| The education levels of women | 0.406 | 0.441 | 0.199–0.977 | <0.05 | |
| The education levels of husbands | 0.397 | 0.661 | 0.303–1.440 | NS | |
| Employment status of women | 0.443 | 0.353 | 0.148–0.840 | <0.05 | |
| Employment status of husband | 0.318 | 0.623 | 0.334–1.162 | NS | |
| Unplanned pregnancy | 0.459 | 18.113 | 7.371–44.510 | <0.001 | |
| Pregnancy number | 0.197 | 1.049 | 0.713–1.543 | NS | |
| Economic satisfaction score | 0.079 | 0.942 | 0.808–1.099 | NS | |
| Household food security status | |||||
| Food secure | - | Reference | - | - | |
| Food insecure without hunger | 0.366 | 0.813 | 0.397–1.665 | NS | |
| Food insecure with hunger | 0.397 | 0.747 | 0.343–1.626 | NS | |
SE, standard error; OR, odds ratio; CI, confidence interval; NS, not significant.