SCOPE: Birth cohorts typically measure plasma folate in midgestation, but effects of folic acid supplementation are sometimes specific to the periconceptional period. The relationship between midgestation plasma folate and periconceptional supplementation is not known. We compared plasma folate at week 18 of gestation with self-report use of supplements comtaining folic acid from before pregnancy to week 17 of gestation. METHODS AND RESULTS: The sample comprised 2911 women from The Norwegian Mother and Child Cohort Study. For women reporting continuous supplementation from gestational week -4 to 17 (N = 238), median plasma folate was 15.72 at week 18 (in nmol/L). This was about threefold higher than the median plasma folate of 5.67 for women reporting no supplementation from week -4 to 17 (N = 844), but only slightly higher than the median plasma folate of 13.34 for all women reporting supplementation in weeks 13-17 (N = 1158). Reported supplementation before week 8 was not associated with plasma folate at week 18, in an analysis that adjusted for continued supplementation after week 8. CONCLUSION: Overall we found a strong and coherent relationship between self-reported folic acid use and plasma folate at week 18. We also found that plasma folate at week 18 did not reflect self-reported supplementation before week 8. For periconceptional supplementation per se, self-report data may offer a better measure.
SCOPE: Birth cohorts typically measure plasma folate in midgestation, but effects of folic acid supplementation are sometimes specific to the periconceptional period. The relationship between midgestation plasma folate and periconceptional supplementation is not known. We compared plasma folate at week 18 of gestation with self-report use of supplements comtaining folic acid from before pregnancy to week 17 of gestation. METHODS AND RESULTS: The sample comprised 2911 women from The Norwegian Mother and Child Cohort Study. For women reporting continuous supplementation from gestational week -4 to 17 (N = 238), median plasma folate was 15.72 at week 18 (in nmol/L). This was about threefold higher than the median plasma folate of 5.67 for women reporting no supplementation from week -4 to 17 (N = 844), but only slightly higher than the median plasma folate of 13.34 for all women reporting supplementation in weeks 13-17 (N = 1158). Reported supplementation before week 8 was not associated with plasma folate at week 18, in an analysis that adjusted for continued supplementation after week 8. CONCLUSION: Overall we found a strong and coherent relationship between self-reported folic acid use and plasma folate at week 18. We also found that plasma folate at week 18 did not reflect self-reported supplementation before week 8. For periconceptional supplementation per se, self-report data may offer a better measure.
Authors: Kjersti S Rønningen; Liv Paltiel; Helle M Meltzer; Rannveig Nordhagen; Kari K Lie; Ragnhild Hovengen; Margaretha Haugen; Wenche Nystad; Per Magnus; Jane A Hoppin Journal: Eur J Epidemiol Date: 2006-09-20 Impact factor: 8.082
Authors: Michael C Wu; Bonnie R Joubert; Pei-fen Kuan; Siri E Håberg; Wenche Nystad; Shyamal D Peddada; Stephanie J London Journal: Epigenetics Date: 2013-11-15 Impact factor: 4.528
Authors: Joseph M Braun; Tanya Froehlich; Amy Kalkbrenner; Christine M Pfeiffer; Zia Fazili; Kimberly Yolton; Bruce P Lanphear Journal: J Autism Dev Disord Date: 2014-10
Authors: Anna K Knight; Hea Jin Park; Dorothy B Hausman; Jennifer M Fleming; Victoria L Bland; Gisselle Rosa; Elizabeth M Kennedy; Marie A Caudill; Olga Malysheva; Gail P A Kauwell; Andrew Sokolow; Susan Fisher; Alicia K Smith; Lynn B Bailey Journal: Sci Rep Date: 2018-11-15 Impact factor: 4.379
Authors: Elisabeth Synnøve Nilsen Husebye; Nils Erik Gilhus; Bettina Riedel; Olav Spigset; Anne Kjersti Daltveit; Marte Helene Bjørk Journal: Neurology Date: 2018-08-01 Impact factor: 9.910
Authors: Marit P Martinussen; Michael B Bracken; Elizabeth W Triche; Geir W Jacobsen; Kari R Risnes Journal: Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol Date: 2015-10-09 Impact factor: 2.831
Authors: Martina Barchitta; Andrea Maugeri; Roberta Magnano San Lio; Giuliana Favara; Claudia La Mastra; Maria Clara La Rosa; Antonella Agodi Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2020-01-19 Impact factor: 3.390