Literature DB >> 31777605

The ABO Blood Group is an Independent Prognostic Factor in Patients with Ovarian Cancer.

Qian Song1, Jun-Zhou Wu2, Sheng Wang1, Zhong-Bo Chen3.   

Abstract

Previous studies have suggested a relationship between ABO blood group and clinical outcome of various cancers. Nevertheless, little is known about the association between ABO blood group and survival in patients with ovarian carcinoma. This study aimed to investigate the prognostic significance of ABO blood group in patients with ovarian carcinoma. 941 patients who were newly diagnosed with ovarian carcinoma between February 2007 and February 2016 were enrolled in the present study. The relationship between ABO blood type and clinical features in patients with ovarian cancer was analyzed using chi-square tests. Overall survival (OS) stratified by B antigen was evaluated using log-rank test and Kaplan-Meier method. Presence of the B antigen (B/AB) had a worse OS than those in the absence of the B antigen (A/O) in all patients with ovarian cancer, especially in patients with FIGO stage I, IV, and menopause. Presence of the B antigen (B/AB) was significantly correlated with OS than those with non-B antigen (A/O) (hazard ratios 1.342; 95% confidence interval 1.069-1.685; P=0.011). Multivariate analyses revealed that presence of the B antigen (B/AB) was independently associated with OS (hazard ratios 1.532; 95% confidence interval 1.111-2.112; P=0.009). This study indicated that presence of the B antigen (B/AB) was an unfavorable prognostic factor in ovarian carcinoma, especially in patients with FIGO stage I, IV, and menopause. © The author(s).

Entities:  

Keywords:  ABO blood group; B antigen; ovarian cancer; prognosis

Year:  2019        PMID: 31777605      PMCID: PMC6856877          DOI: 10.7150/jca.36236

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cancer        ISSN: 1837-9664            Impact factor:   4.207


Introduction

Ovarian cancer is identified as the seventh most commonly diagnosed carcinoma in the world and the fifth leading cause of carcinoma-related death in women 1-2. Because of the lack of screening for diagnosis of ovarian cancer at early stage, approximately 85 percent of cases of ovarian cancer are diagnosed at an advanced stage (III/IV) 3. Patients with ovarian cancer face with worse prognosis that the 5-year survival rate is only 30% 4. Several factors are correlated with the survival of ovarian cancer, including FIGO stage, residual disease, and grade of differentiation 5-7. Nevertheless, patients with the similar FIGO stage and grade have different prognosis. Therefore, it is imperative to identify accurate, inexpensive and reproducible prognosis factors of ovarian cancer. Some studies have suggested the relationship between the ABO blood type and the risk of various carcinomas, including colorectal cancer, renal cell carcinoma, and pancreatic carcinoma 8-10. Meanwhile, in a recent analysis of 49,153 women in 1 prospective study, individuals with presence of the B antigen (B/AB) had an increased incidence of ovarian cancer compared with those with non-B antigen (A/O) 11. While several retrospective studies have showed that blood type A was correlated with a higher incidence of ovarian carcinoma compared with blood type O 12-14. However, few studies have evaluated the association between ABO blood group and the prognosis among patients with ovarian cancer. Two retrospective researches reported that blood type A was correlated with a worse clinical outcome in 256 patients with ovarian cancer and in 92 patients with ovarian cancer 15-16. Therefore, we aimed to evaluate the relationship between ABO blood group and the survival of patients with ovarian carcinoma.

Materials and Methods

Patient selection

941 patients who were newly diagnosed with primary ovarian carcinoma from February 2007 to February 2016 at the Zhejiang Cancer Hospital were selected for this retrospective research. The diagnosis of ovarian carcinoma was confirmed by a postoperative pathology diagnosis. The criteria of pathology diagnosis were in accordance with the World Health Organization classification standard. The inclusive criteria as follows: (1) ovarian cancer was pathologically confirmed; (2) complete clinical records, including age, FIGO stage, histologic differentiation, menopause, family history of cancer, ascites at surgery, residual disease, and follow-up data; (3) sufficient clinical examination, including ABO blood group, preoperative serum CA125 level. The ABO blood type (A/B/AB/O) was checked by anti-A and anti-B blood grouping reagents (monoclonal antibody). CA125 antigen was quantified in serum in Zhejiang cancer hospital using chemiluminescence microparticle immune assay (CMIA) [ARCHITECT CA125 II Reagent Kit, Abbott]. In the first half year undergoing surgery, patients were followed up at the first, third and sixth months. Patients were followed up every six months during the following years. The follow up examinations include physical examination, serum CA125 level and blood routine examination el at. This retrospective study was approved by the Ethics Committee of Zhejiang Cancer Hospital. All patients provided written informed consent.

Statistical analysis

The relationship between ABO blood type and clinical features in patients with ovarian carcinoma was analyzed using chi-square tests. The relationship between presence of B antigen (B/AB) and clinical features in patients with ovarian cancer was also evaluated using chi-square tests. Overall survival (OS) was calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method and the log-rank test. Hazard ratio and 95% confidence interval were calculated using COX regression analyses. The overall survival curve was evaluated by GraphPad Prism 7 software. All data were examined by the SPSS software (version 19.0). A value of P < 0.05 was regarded as statistical significance.

Results

Patient characteristics

We enrolled 941 patients with ovarian cancer in the study from February 2007 to February 2016. The median age of all individuals was 54 years (range: 23-81 years). 51 patients had FIGO stage I, 76 patients had FIGO stage II, 651 patients had FIGO stage III, and 163 patients had FIGO stage IV. A total of 795 patients had serous cancer, and 146 patients had other. 322 patients had blood type A (34.2%), 250 patients had blood type B (26.6%), 75 patients had blood type AB (8.0%), and 294 patients had blood type O (31.2%). No significant association was determined between the ABO blood group and age, menopause, FIGO stage, family history of cancer, ascites at surgery, residual disease, histology, grade, lymph node stats, Rh factor, and CA125 at diagnosis (Table 1).
Table 1

Relationship between ABO blood group and clinicopathological features in patients with ovarian cancer

CharacteristicsTotal (N=941)A (N=322)B (N=250)AB (N=75)O (N=294)P value
Age[median (range),years]54 (23-81)55 (23-80)54 (25-80)55 (36-77)53 (26-81)
≤55503170134381610.920
>5543815211637133
Menopause
Yes542191142471620.574
No39919110828132
FIGO stage
I5116175130.504
II762518726
III65121818450199
IV16363311356
Family history of cancer
Yes3071047629980.595
No63421817446196
Ascites at surgery
Yes448164108311450.523
No17163431748
Unkown322
Residual disease
≤1cm817281215642570.932
>1cm12441351137
Histology
Serous795275206652490.725
Other14647441045
Grade
Well36313384261200.286
Moderate22368692264
Poorly25389631883
Unkown102
Lymph node stats
Positive532187139381680.683
Negative40913511137126
Rh factor
Positive937319250742940.125
Negative43010
CA125 at diagnosis
≤35 U/ml5519125190.851
>35 U/ml88630323870275

FIGO, International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics.

Correlation between presence of the B antigen (B/AB) and clinical features

The correlation between presence of the B antigen (B/AB) and clinical characteristics was listed in Table 2. 325 patients had presence of the B antigen (B/AB) (34.5%), and 616 patients had presence of the non-B antigen (A/O) (65.5%). None of the clinical features was significantly correlated with presence of the B antigen (B/AB), including age, menopause, FIGO stage, family history of cancer, ascites at surgery, residual disease, histology, lymph node stats, Rh factor, and CA125 at diagnosis. Nevertheless, presence of the B antigen (B/AB) was notably associated with grade (P=0.027).
Table 2

Relationship between B antigen and clinicopathological features in patients with ovarian cancer

CharacteristicsNon-B antigen (A/O) (N=616)B antigen (B/AB) (N=325)P value
Age[median (range),years]54 (23-81)55 (25-80)
≤553311720.813
>55285153
Menopause
Yes3531890.802
No263136
FIGO stage
I29220.092
II5125
III417234
IV11944
Family history of cancer
Yes2021050.880
No414220
Ascites at surgery
Yes3091390.333
No11160
Unkown
Residual disease
≤1cm5382790.520
>1cm7846
Histology
Serous5242710.498
Other9254
Grade
Well2531100.027
Moderate13291
Poorly17281
Unkown
Lymph node stats
Positive3551770.351
Negative261148
Rh factor
Positive6133240.688
Negative31
CA125 at diagnosis
≤35 U/ml38170.560
>35 U/ml578308

FIGO, International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics.

Prognostic variables for OS

The Kaplan-Meier curves suggested that patients in blood type B had a worse survival compared with those in the non-B blood types (P=0.048) (Figure 1). Furthermore, we evaluated the prognostic value of the ABO blood group with presence of the B antigen (B/AB) and non-B antigen (A/O), patients with presence of the B antigen (B/AB) had a worse survival compared to the patients with presence of the non-B antigen (A/O) (P=0.010) (Figure 2).
Figure 1

Overall survival for patients with ovarian cancer based on ABO blood type. The patients in blood type B showed significantly worse survival compared to the patients in the non-B blood types (P = 0.048).

Figure 2

Overall survival for patients with ovarian cancer with B antigen (B/AB) and Non-B antigen (A/O).

Univariate analysis indicated that in addition to presence of the B antigen (B/AB) (P=0.011), menopause (P=0.028), FIGO stage I (P=0.008), FIGO stage II (P=0.005), ascites at surgery (P=0.006), residual disease (P=0.008), and lymph node stats (P=0.022) were also significantly correlated with OS. In the multivariate analysis, menopause (P=0.010), FIGO stage I (P=0.008), FIGO stage II (P=0.027), presence of the B antigen (B/AB) (P=0.009) were significantly associated with OS (Table 3).
Table 3

Overall survival analyses according to ABO blood group in patients with ovarian cancer

VariablesUnivariateMultivariate
HR95% CIP valueHR95% CIP value
Age ( >55 vs. ≤55)1.2000.960-1.4990.109
Menopause (No vs. Yes)1.2881.027-1.6150.028 1.5301.105-2.1190.010
FIGO stage
I0.3170.135-0.7440.008 0.2970.121-0.7270.008
II0.4300.239-0.7750.005 0.4760.247-0.9190.027
III1.0990.796-1.5160.5671.1210.778-1.6150.541
IV1.000
Family history of cancer (No vs. Yes)0.8450.663-1.0770.173
Ascites at surgery (No vs. Yes)1.7061.166-2.4970.006 1.4610.981-2.1750.062
Residual disease (>1cm vs. ≤1cm)1.4541.102-1.9180.008 1.1630.735-1.8410.519
Histology (Other vs. Serous)1.1130.826-1.5000.481
Grade
Well0.8300.583-1.1820.302
Moderate1.1190.862-1.4530.400
Poorly1.000
Lymph node stats (Negative vs. Positive)1.3031.038-1.6350.022 0.9240.656-1.3010.652
CA125 at diagnosis (>35 U/ml vs. ≤35 U/ml)1.1440.669-1.9550.624
Blood type
A0.8440.633-1.1260.249
B1.2580.947-1.6710.112
AB1.1470.752-1.7490.524
O1.000
A antigen [Absent (O/B) vs.Present (A/AB) ]0.8070.642-1.0150.067
B antigen [Absent (O/A) vs. Present (B/AB)]1.3421.069-1.6850.011 1.5321.111-2.1120.009

Subgroup analysis according to FIGO stage and menopause

To evaluate the subgroups of ovarian cancer affected by presence of the B antigen (B/AB), we classified patients based on FIGO stage (I, n=51; II, n=76; III, n=651; IV, n=163) and menopause (Yes, n=542; No, n=399). OS of FIGO stage I and IV were significantly worse for patients with presence of the B antigen (B/AB) (P=0.009 and P=0.035), but OS did not differ neither FIGO stage II nor III (P=0.279 and P=0.219) (Figure 3). OS of patients with menopause was notably worse for patients with presence of the B antigen (B/AB) (P=0.035), but OS of patients without menopause did not differ (P=0.119) (Figure 4).
Figure 3

Overall survival for patients with ovarian cancer with B antigen (B/AB) and Non-B antigen (A/O) in patients with FIGO stage I (A), II (B), III (C), and IV (D).

Figure 4

Overall survival for patients with ovarian cancer with B antigen (B/AB) and Non-B antigen (A/O) in patients with menopause (A) and Non-menopause (B).

Discussions

In this large, retrospective study, blood groups B and AB were significantly associated with worse survival of ovarian cancer. The magnitude of the relationship was similar for blood group B and AB indicating that the B antigen may affect ovarian progression. In analyses of presence of the B antigen (B/AB) compared with absence of the B antigen (A/O), we observed a significantly worse survival in ovarian cancer with FIGO stage I, IV, and menopause. Previous studies have suggested that the ABO blood group play an important role in the development of various cancers. As ABO antigens are expressed on the surface of several human tissues and cells, such as the ovary surface epithelial cells and ovarian inclusion cysts 17-18. The relationship between the ABO blood group and the cancer risk has been intensely investigated across many different types of cancer, including pancreatic carcinoma, nasopharyngeal cancer, gastric carcinoma, lung carcinoma 19-22. Besides, in a large, prospective study of women, individuals with presence of the B antigen (B/AB) were associated with increased risk of ovarian cancer 11. However, previous retrospective studies have suggested that blood type A had an increased incidence of ovarian cancer 12-14. Proposed reasons for these inconsistent findings were that participants in all studies were from different races, most retrospective reports did not adjust for other possible confounders, and several studies used hospital-based control individual, which may not represent the ABO distribution in the general population 12-13. There are also many studies have suggested a possible association between the ABO blood group and the clinical outcome in patients with malignant cancers. In 900 patients who underwent resection for renal cell carcinoma, the authors revealed that the non-O blood type was significantly associated with decreased OS 23. Previous study about 404 patients undergoing resection for esophageal carcinoma, there was no relationship between the ABO blood type and the prognosis of esophageal cancer 24. One study showed that blood group A and AB had a shorter OS than others in 333 patients undergoing resection for non-small cell lung cancer 25. Meanwhile, two retrospective reports with a relatively small number of individuals enrolled, regarding the association between the ABO blood group and the clinical outcome of patients with ovarian cancer. Their findings suggested that a negative relationship between blood type A and ovarian cancer survival, but no relationship with blood type B 15-16. Owing to these results, we hypothesized that whether blood type A or blood type B might associate with prognosis of ovarian cancer. We found that blood group B and AB indicated worse survival in patients with ovarian cancer, especially in patients with FIGO I, IV, and menopause. The reasons for these conflicting results were that a relatively large number of participants enrolled without exclusion of FIGO stage IV, the proportions of ABO blood group were different. 256 patients with ovarian cancer in previous study, 60 patients had blood group A (23.4%), 52 patients had blood group B (20.3%), 24 patients had blood group AB (9.4%), and 120 patients had blood type O (46.9%) 15. 941 patients enrolled in our study, the ABO distribution was 322 patients with blood type A (34.2%), 250 patients with blood type B (26.6%), 75 patients with blood type AB (8.0%), and 294 patients with blood type O (31.2%). The mechanisms of the ABO blood group and the survival of cancer have not been intensely investigated. As A and B antigens are also expressed on the ovarian cancer tissues 17-18. We hypothesized that the ABO antigens in cancer cells contribute to the pathway signaling, intracellular adhesion, and inflammation, all of which play an important part in the progression of carcinoma 26. The expression of ABO blood antigens on tumor cells was influenced by hyper-methylation of ABO promoter, which was associated with the tumor progression. ABO promoter hyper-methylation was also checked in dysplastic and hyperplastic tissues adjacent to tumor, indicating that it was an early event in the development of carcinoma 27. Therefore, B antigen was correlated with the survival of patients in the FIGO stage I. The ABO gene, which is located on chromosome 9q34, encodes glycosyltransferases to form the ABO blood group antigens 28. The ABO gene is one frequent region of deletion in ovarian cancer 29. Aberrant glycosylation was one of the most important hallmarks of tumor 30. Therefore, we speculate that patients with presence of B antigen (B/AB) have more malignant cancer cells. Patients in the FIGO stage IV showed the worse survival. There are several limitations of this analysis: first, this study was a retrospective and single-center analysis. Second, the clinical results regarding the ABO blood types were determined by a serological technique according to the phenotype, not the genotype. Third, all the participants of this analysis were Chinese, perhaps restricting the generalizability of these findings. Therefore, further investigations are required to clarify the reproducibility of this study, including the multi-center analysis and the investigation of different races from other countries. In summary, our results show that there are a possible association between the B blood group antigen and worse clinical outcome of ovarian cancer. Patients with presence of the B antigen (B/AB) had a significantly worse survival than those with non-B antigen (A/O), especially in patients with FIGO stage I, IV, and menopause. However, given the inconsistent findings of previous studies, additional investigations are urgently needed to evaluate this association. Researches of potential mechanisms for a relationship between the ABO blood group and ovarian cancer prognosis also are needed.
  30 in total

1.  Focus on epithelial ovarian cancer.

Authors:  Robert F Ozols; Michael A Bookman; Denise C Connolly; Mary B Daly; Andrew K Godwin; Russell J Schilder; Xiangxi Xu; Thomas C Hamilton
Journal:  Cancer Cell       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 31.743

2.  Prognostic factors in ovarian cancer: how close are we to a complete picture?

Authors:  R Agarwal; S B Kaye
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 32.976

3.  Association of ABO blood group and risk of lung cancer in a multicenter study in Turkey.

Authors:  Yuksel Urun; Gungor Utkan; Ayten Kayi Cangir; Omur Berna Oksuzoglu; Nuriye Ozdemir; Derya Gokmen Oztuna; Gokhan Kocaman; Hasan Şenol Coşkun; Muhammet Ali Kaplan; Cabir Yuksel; Ahmet Demirkazik; Fikri Icli
Journal:  Asian Pac J Cancer Prev       Date:  2013

4.  MicroRNA expression profiles in serous ovarian carcinoma.

Authors:  Eun Ji Nam; Heejei Yoon; Sang Wun Kim; Hoguen Kim; Young Tae Kim; Jae Hoon Kim; Jae Wook Kim; Sunghoon Kim
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2008-05-01       Impact factor: 12.531

5.  ABO blood group and risk of colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Hamed Khalili; Brian M Wolpin; Edward S Huang; Edward L Giovannucci; Peter Kraft; Charles S Fuchs; Andrew T Chan
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2011-03-17       Impact factor: 4.254

6.  ABO blood group and nasopharyngeal carcinoma risk in a population of Southeast China.

Authors:  Liming Sheng; Xiaojiang Sun; Lizhen Zhang; Dan Su
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  2013-03-09       Impact factor: 7.396

7.  ABO blood group and risk of renal cell cancer.

Authors:  Hee-Kyung Joh; Eunyoung Cho; Toni K Choueiri
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol       Date:  2012-07-26       Impact factor: 2.984

8.  Ovarian cancer and ABO blood groups.

Authors:  J Henderson; V Seagroatt; M Goldacre
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  1993-08       Impact factor: 3.710

9.  ABO blood group is a predictor of survival in patients undergoing surgery for renal cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Samuel D Kaffenberger; Todd M Morgan; Kelly L Stratton; Adu M Boachie; Daniel A Barocas; Sam S Chang; Michael S Cookson; S Duke Herrell; Joseph A Smith; Peter E Clark
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2012-09-07       Impact factor: 5.588

10.  High frequency of chromosome 9 deletion in ovarian cancer: evidence for three tumour-suppressor loci.

Authors:  J Devlin; P A Elder; H Gabra; C M Steel; M A Knowles
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1996-02       Impact factor: 7.640

View more
  2 in total

1.  AMPH1 functions as a tumour suppressor in ovarian cancer via the inactivation of PI3K/AKT pathway.

Authors:  Yajun Chen; Wenjiao Cao; Lihua Wang; Tianying Zhong
Journal:  J Cell Mol Med       Date:  2020-05-31       Impact factor: 5.310

Review 2.  The Intriguing Connections between von Willebrand Factor, ADAMTS13 and Cancer.

Authors:  Chanukya K Colonne; Emmanuel J Favaloro; Leonardo Pasalic
Journal:  Healthcare (Basel)       Date:  2022-03-16
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.