| Literature DB >> 31777539 |
Jie Wu1, Juanli Zhang1, Jing Chen1, Yamei Han1.
Abstract
To observe the effect of probiotics on the stress responses and intestinal permeability of term neonates with low Apgar scores, the present study retrospectively analyzed the clinical data of 78 term neonates (42 males and 36 females). In the control group (n=38), total parenteral nutrition and comprehensive treatment (anti-infection therapy) were provided. In the observation group (n=40), the neonates were administered Lactobacillus Complex Capsules in addition to the control group treatment. The corticotropin-releasing factor level was determined using ELISA; cortisol levels were determined using a radioimmunoprecipitation assay; D-lactate and diamine oxidase levels were determined using ultraviolet spectrometry; procalcitonin levels were determined using ECL; and C-reactive protein levels were determined using a protein analyzer. Following treatment, the levels of all parameters were lower in the observation group compared with the control group, and the differences were statistically significant (P<0.05). In the observation group, the daily milk intake was 16.57±2.58 ml, which was significantly higher than that of the control group (13.26±1.87 ml), while the length of hospital stay and total parenteral nutrition time, which were 12.31±2.02 and 6.21±1.26 days, respectively, in the observation group, were significantly shorter than those of the control group (14.86±2.58 and 8.86±1.78 days, respectively), and the differences were statistically significant (P<0.001). The results of the present study suggested that probiotics can ameliorate the stress response and intestinal permeability of term neonates with low Apgar scores, thereby, facilitating gastrointestinal function recovery. Copyright: © Wu et al.Entities:
Keywords: intestinal permeability; low Apgar score; probiotics; stress response; term neonates
Year: 2019 PMID: 31777539 PMCID: PMC6862688 DOI: 10.3892/etm.2019.8107
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Exp Ther Med ISSN: 1792-0981 Impact factor: 2.447
Comparison of the general data of the observation and control groups.
| Factors | Observation group (n=40), n (%) | Control group (n=38), n (%) | t or χ2 | P-value |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sex | 1.251 | 0.364 | ||
| Male | 24 (60.00) | 18 (47.37) | ||
| Female | 16 (40.00) | 20 (52.63) | ||
| Gestational age (weeks) | 38.96±1.02 | 38.73±0.98 | 1.015 | 0.314 |
| Height (cm) | 48.63±3.56 | 49.04±2.97 | 0.551 | 0.583 |
| Weight (kg) | 3.86±0.38 | 3.77±0.34 | 1.100 | 0.275 |
| 1-min Apgar score | 5.26±0.81 | 5.41±0.89 | 0.779 | 0.438 |
| 5-min Apgar score | 6.41±1.26 | 6.58±1.12 | 0.629 | 0.532 |
| Type of birth | 0.425 | 0.607 | ||
| Natural labor | 9 (22.50) | 11 (28.95) | ||
| Cesarean section | 31 (77.50) | 27 (71.05) | ||
| Intrauterine hypoxia | 0.167 | 0.815 | ||
| Yes | 26 (65.00) | 23 (60.53) | ||
| No | 14 (35.00) | 15 (39.47) |
Figure 1.Comparison of stress indexes in the observation and control groups before and after treatment. CRF, corticotropin-releasing factor; CRP, C-reactive protein.
Comparison of stress responses of neonates before vs. after treatment in the observation and control groups.
| Group | Number (n) | Time point | Cortisol (µg/l) | CRF (ng/l) | CRP (ng/l) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Observation | 40 | Before treatment | 147.56±21.05 | 421.65±63.75 | 32.53±3.16 |
| After treatment | 68.63±11.58[ | 235.82±42.32[ | 14.64±1.65[ | ||
| t | 20.78 | 15.36 | 31.74 | ||
| P-value | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | ||
| Control | 38 | Before treatment | 144.67±19.68 | 416.58±76.15 | 31.78±3.56 |
| After treatment | 84.62±14.53 | 265.37±51.26 | 17.35±1.52 | ||
| t | 15.13 | 10.15 | 22.98 | ||
| P-value | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 |
P<001 vs. control group. CRF, corticotropin-releasing factor; CRP, C-reactive protein.
Figure 2.Comparison of intestinal permeability in the observation and control groups of neonates before and after treatment. DAO, diamine oxidase; PCT, procalcitonin.
Comparison of intestinal permeability of neonates before vs. after treatment in the observation and control groups.
| Group | Number (n) | Time point | D-lactate (mM) | PCT (ng/l) | DAO (U/l) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Observation | 40 | Before treatment | 1.59±0.28 | 1.08±0.15 | 18.62±3.14 |
| After treatment | 0.68±0.12[ | 0.24±0.05[ | 5.63±1.35[ | ||
| t | 18.89 | 33.60 | 24.04 | ||
| P-value | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | ||
| Control | 38 | Before treatment | 1.57±0.26 | 1.05±0.13 | 18.12±2.98 |
| After treatment | 1.09±0.18 | 0.62±0.08 | 9.82±2.46 | ||
| t | 9.433 | 17.48 | 13.24 | ||
| P-value | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 |
P<001 vs. control group. DAO, diamine oxidase; PCT, procalcitonin.
Figure 3.Comparison of intestinal tract recovery in the observation and control groups of neonates.
Comparison of gastrointestinal function recovery of neonates before vs. after treatment in the observation and control groups.
| Group | Number (n) | Daily milk intake (ml) | Length of stay in hospital (days) | Total gastrointestinal feeding time (days) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Observation | 40 | 16.57±2.58 | 12.31±2.02 | 6.21±1.26 |
| Control | 38 | 13.26±1.87 | 14.86±2.58 | 8.86±1.78 |
| T | 6.459 | 4.874 | 7.619 | |
| P-value | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 |
Comparison of the infections in the observation and control groups.
| Group | Number (n) | Umbilical inflammation (n) | Bacterial pneumonia (n) | Scleredema (n) | Impetigo (n) | Total infection, n (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Observation | 40 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 4 (10.00) |
| Control | 38 | 2 | 7 | 1 | 1 | 11 (28.95) |
| t | 4.504 | |||||
| P-value | 0.034 |