Literature DB >> 31776061

Reducing treatment zone diameter in orthokeratology and its effect on peripheral ocular refraction.

Paul Gifford1, Michael Tran2, Courtney Priestley2, Vinod Maseedupally2, Pauline Kang2.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To determine whether orthokeratology (OK) induced treatment zone (TZ) diameter can be reduced by altering OK lens design, and if so the impact of modifying TZ diameter on relative peripheral refraction (RPR).
METHODS: 16 subjects (mean age 23.4 ± 1.5 years; 8 female) completed the study. Standard (Control) OK lens design (PJ, Capricornia, Australia) or a modified version (Test) where the back optic zone diameter was reduced, and back optic zone asphericity and intermediate lens curves were altered, were worn overnight only for 7-nights in a randomised double masked order, with a minimum 1-week wash out (no lens wear) between lens designs. Full correction of refractive error was targeted. Refraction; best corrected visual acuity (BCVA); RPR (Shin-Nippon NVision-k 5001) along the horizontal and vertical meridians; and corneal topography (Medmont E300) were measured before starting lens wear and in the morning after lens removal after the seventh night of lens wear for both lens designs. TZ diameter and decentration was calculated from corneal topography.
RESULTS: After 7-nights of wear both lens designs created -2.00D refraction effect with no significant difference in refractive effect or change to BCVA between the designs. The Test design created a significantly smaller horizontal (4.78 ± 0.37 vs 5.70 ± 0.37 mm, p < 0.001) and vertical (5.09 ± 0.51 vs 5.92 ± 0.51 mm p < 0.001) TZ diameter. The TZ was decentered inferior temporal with no significant difference between designs. There was no significant difference between the lens designs in RPR along the horizontal and vertical meridians at any measurement period.
CONCLUSIONS: OK induced TZ diameter can be reliably reduced by altering OK lens design without detrimentally effecting lens centration or refractive effect. Reducing TZ diameter did not alter RPR, though measurement artifacts could be responsible for masking an effect. Longitudinal studies are needed to assess whether smaller TZ OK lens designs increase efficacy for slowing progression of myopia.
Copyright © 2019. Published by Elsevier Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Corneal refractive therapy; Corneal topography; Myopia; Orthokeratology; Peripheral refraction; Treatment zone; Treatment zone diameter

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31776061     DOI: 10.1016/j.clae.2019.11.006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cont Lens Anterior Eye        ISSN: 1367-0484            Impact factor:   3.077


  5 in total

1.  Peripheral Refraction With Toric Orthokeratology and Soft Toric Multifocal Contact Lenses in Myopic Astigmatic Eyes.

Authors:  Erin S Tomiyama; David A Berntsen; Kathryn Richdale
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2022-07-08       Impact factor: 4.925

2.  Axial length shortening after orthokeratology and its relationship with myopic control.

Authors:  Chenhao Yang; Li Shen; Anken Wang; Jiaying Wang; Zhehuan Zhang; Weiming Yang
Journal:  BMC Ophthalmol       Date:  2022-06-03       Impact factor: 2.086

3.  The Role of Back Optic Zone Diameter in Myopia Control with Orthokeratology Lenses.

Authors:  Jaume Pauné; Silvia Fonts; Lina Rodríguez; Antonio Queirós
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2021-01-18       Impact factor: 4.241

4.  Change in Corneal Power Distribution in Orthokeratology: A Predictor for the Change in Axial Length.

Authors:  Zhe Zhang; Zhi Chen; Zhuoyi Chen; Jiaqi Zhou; Li Zeng; Feng Xue; Xiaomei Qu; Xingtao Zhou
Journal:  Transl Vis Sci Technol       Date:  2022-02-01       Impact factor: 3.283

5.  One-year results of the Variation of Orthokeratology Lens Treatment Zone (VOLTZ) Study: a prospective randomised clinical trial.

Authors:  Biyue Guo; Sin Wan Cheung; Randy Kojima; Pauline Cho
Journal:  Ophthalmic Physiol Opt       Date:  2021-05-15       Impact factor: 3.117

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.