| Literature DB >> 31775715 |
Byeong-Seop Park1, Chin Youb Chung1, Moon Seok Park1, Kyoung Min Lee1, Seong Hee Cho2, Ki Hyuk Sung3.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Gait disturbances, including flexed knee gait, stiff knee gait, and tip-toeing gait, are common in patients with cerebral palsy (CP). There has been no reports regarding kinematic changes in the transverse plane after soft tissue surgeries, such as distal hamstring lengthening (DHL), rectus femoris transfer (RFT), and tendo-Achilles lengthening (TAL). This study aimed to evaluate changes in the transverse plane after soft tissue surgery in patients with CP by assessing the effects of the DHL, RFT, and TAL.Entities:
Keywords: Cerebral palsy; Gait analysis; Multilevel surgery; Soft tissue surgery; Transverse kinematics
Mesh:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31775715 PMCID: PMC6882030 DOI: 10.1186/s12891-019-2955-8
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Musculoskelet Disord ISSN: 1471-2474 Impact factor: 2.362
Patients demographics and summary of concomitant surgeries
| Value | |
| Sex (male/female) | 107/49 |
| Laterality (right/left) | 110/103 |
| Type of involvement (unilateral/bilateral) | 25/131 |
| GMFCS level (I/II/III) | 83/60/13 |
| Age at surgery (years) | 8.4 ± 3.2 (4.4 to 20.9) |
| Follow-up duration (years) | 1.2 ± 0.8 (1.0 to 3.4) |
| Concomitant surgery | Limbs |
| Distal hamstring lengthening | 199 (93.4%) |
| Tendo-Achilles lengthening | 154 (72.3%) |
| Intra-muscular psoas lengthening | 24 (11.3%) |
| Rectus femoris transfer | 130 (61.0%) |
| Adductor tenotomy | 7 (3.3%) |
GMFCS Gross motor function classification system
Preoperative and postoperative kinematic data
| Parameters | Preoperative | Postoperative | Normal control | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mean pelvic rotation (°)a | 0.2 ± 7.9 | −0.5 ± 5.9 | 0.181 | − 1.0 ± 2.1 |
| Mean hip rotation (°)a | 3.3 ± 11.8 | 3.7 ± 10.1 | 0.713 | − 1.6 ± 7.7 |
| Mean tibial rotation (°)a | −2.3 ± 11.1 | − 5.2 ± 11.1 | 0.004 | − 17.4 ± 8.9 |
| Mean foot progression angle (°)a | − 1.7 ± 12.5 | − 11.2 ± 9.9 | < 0.001 | − 10.6 ± 6.1 |
| Knee flexion at initial contact(°) | 29.8 ± 12.4 | 22.4 ± 9.6 | < 0.001 | 8.5 ± 3.9 |
| Minimum knee flexion in stance phase (°) | 8.1 ± 14.2 | 6.6 ± 8.7 | 0.094 | 7.4 ± 3.5 |
| Ankle dorsiflexion at initial contact (°)b | −4.5 ± 11.9 | 4.3 ± 7.8 | < 0.001 | 3.2 ± 3.2 |
| Mean ankle dorsiflexion in stance phase (°) | 1.5 ± 12.9 | 10.1 ± 5.6 | < 0.001 | 7.7 ± 1.8 |
Data are presented as mean ± standard deviation
aNegative value means external rotation
bNegative value means plantarflexion
Influencing factors for the change of transverse kinematics after surgery in patients with cerebral palsy
| Mean pelvic rotation (°) | Mean hip rotation (°) | Mean tibial rotation (°) | Foot progression angle (°) | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Estimation (95% CI) | Estimation (95% CI) | Estimation (95% CI) | Estimation (95% CI) | |||||
| DHL | −1.1 (−5.6, 3.5) | 0.645 | 0.7 (−6.8, 8.1) | 0.860 | 0.9 (− 7.5, 9.3) | 0.833 | −5.2 (− 11.7, 1.2) | 0.112 |
| RFT | 2.0 (−0.4, 4.3) | 0.104 | −4.7 (−8.6, − 0.8) | 0.019 | 1.8 (− 2.7, 6.3) | 0.436 | −1.2 (− 4.6, 2.3) | 0.503 |
| TAL | 1.0 (−1.4, 3.4) | 0.411 | 2.0 (−2.0, 5.9) | 0.325 | 0.6 (−4.0, 5.2) | 0.808 | −3.9 (− 7.4, −0.4) | 0.028 |
| Type of involvement (bilateral) | − 3.4 (0.0, 11.3) | 0.050 | 5.7 (0.0, 11.3) | 0.048 | −3.0 (− 9.3, 3.4) | 0.365 | −2.1 (−7.0, 2.8) | 0.401 |
| GMFCS level (I) | ||||||||
| II | 0.2 (−2.1, 2.5) | 0.864 | −2.4 (−6.2, 1.4) | 0.212 | 5.3 (0.7, 9.8) | 0.023 | 0.0 (−3.4, 3.4) | 0.986 |
| III | −5.1 (− 9.2, −1.0) | 0.014 | 0.1 (−6.6, 6.9) | 0.970 | 7.8 (−0.2, 15.8) | 0.056 | −5.9 (− 11.9, 0.1) | 0.055 |
CI Confidence interval, DHL Distal hamstring lengthening, RFT Rectus femoris transfer, TAL Tendo-Achilles lengthening, GMFCS Gross motor function classification system
Fig. 1Change of mean hip rotation in patients who performed rectus femoris transfer (RFT) and those who did not perform RFT. The change of mean hip rotation in patients who underwent RFT was toward a more external rotation (4.7°) than those who did not undergo RFT
Fig. 2Change of mean foot progression angle in patients who performed tendo-Achilles lengthening (TAL) and those who did not perform TAL. The change of foot progression angle in patients who underwent TAL was toward a more external rotation (3.9°) than those who did not undergo TAL