Literature DB >> 31775481

[Clinical observation of 12 patients with refractory/relapsed acute myeloid leukemia treated with allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation containing cladribine regimen].

H Ai1, Y W Fu, Y Q Wang, X D Wei, Y P Song.   

Abstract

Objective: To investigate the safety and efficacy of allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) containing cladribine sequential busulfan regimen for refractory/relapsed acute myeloid leukemia (AML) .
Methods: The clinical data of 12 refractory/relapsed AML patients received allo-HSCT with cladribine sequential busulfan regimen.
Results: ① Of the 12 patients, 9 were males and 3 females, with a median age of 36 (27-50) years. The donors were identical sibling (3) , matched unrelated (1) and haploidentical family member (9) respectively. Nine patients reached partial remission and other remained no remission after chemotherapy before allo-HSCT. The median previous chemotherapy courses before allo-HSCT were 6 (2-13) . ② Conditioning regimen: Smostine 250 mg·m(-2)·d(-1), d-7; Cladribine 5 mg·m(-2)·d(-1), d-6 to d-2; Cytarabine Arabinoside 2 g·m(-2)·d(-1), d-6 to d-2; Busulfan 3.2 mg·m(-2)·d(-1), d-6 to d-3; Rabbit anti-human thymocyte immunoglobulin (ATG) 1.5 mg·m(-2)·d(-1) (unrelated donor transplantation) or 2.0-2.5 mg·m(-2)·d(-1) (haplo-HSCT) , d-4 to d-1. ③ Of the 12 patients, 11 patients attained complete haploidentical engraftment, one case occurred primary graft failure. The median durations for neutrophils and platelet implantations were 15 (15-21) and 19 (17-30) days respectively. ④After conditioning, no hepatic veno-occlusive diseases were observed, hemorrhagic cystitis occurred in 2 patients, 8 patients had fever, 3 cases experienced acute GVHD grade II, localized chronic GVHD occurred in 8 patients. ⑤The median follow-up was 8 (4-12) months. Leukemia relapse occurred in 2 patients at time of 6, 12 months after allo-HSCT. The estimated 1-year OS and DFS were (71.1±1.8) % and (62.2±1.8) %, respectively. Conclusions: allo-HSCT with cladribine sequential busulfan regimen was a feasible choice with favorable outcome for refractory/relapsed AML.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Acute myeloid leukemia; Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation; Cladribine

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31775481      PMCID: PMC7364979          DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0253-2727.2019.10.006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Zhonghua Xue Ye Xue Za Zhi        ISSN: 0253-2727


目前,难治/复发急性髓系白血病(AML)患者预后极差,异基因造血干细胞(allo-HSCT)是其挽救性治疗的一种有效手段。单倍型造血干细胞移植(haplo-HSCT)能够获得更好的移植物抗白血病效应(GVL)[1],但难治/复发AML患者allo-HSCT后复发率达44%,3年无病生存(DFS)率仅为10%左右[2]–[3]。因此,难治/复发AML选择合适强度预处理方案及移植后免疫治疗至关重要[4]–[5]。克拉屈滨联合阿糖胞苷及G-CSF组成的GLAG方案目前已被国内外指南推荐为难治/复发AML的标准挽救治疗方案[6]–[7]。克拉屈滨、阿糖胞苷序贯白消安可增加残留异常细胞对化疗药物的敏感性、消耗DNA甲基转移酶供体诱导细胞凋亡,从而最大限度地清除残存白血病细胞,降低难治/复发AML患者的复发率[8]。我们采用含克拉屈滨预处理方案allo-HSCT治疗12例难治/复发AML患者,取得较好疗效。

病例与方法

1.病例资料:本研究纳入2017年8月至2018年10月在河南省肿瘤医院血液科接受含克拉屈滨预处理方案allo-HSCT治疗的12例难治/复发AML患者。难治/复发患者诊断标准[9]:①初发时存在预后不佳的细胞遗传学、分子生物学特征;②两疗程诱导治疗未达完全缓解(CR);③第1次完全缓解(CR1)后经巩固治疗,12个月内复发且常规化疗无效者;④移植前处于CR2及以上、未缓解(NR)、微小残留病(MRD)未转阴。 2.预处理方案:司莫司汀250 mg·m−2·d−1,−7 d;克拉屈滨5 mg·m−2·d−1,−6 d~−2 d;阿糖胞苷2 g·m−2·d−1,−6 d~−2 d;白消安3.2 mg·m−2·d−1,−6 d~−3 d。:兔抗人胸腺细胞球蛋白(ATG)1.5 mg·m−2·d−1(无关供者移植)或2.0~2.5 mg·m−2·d−1(haplo-HSCT),−4 d~−1 d。 3.GVHD的预防:同胞全相合移植采用环孢素A(CsA)+短程甲氨蝶呤(MTX)预防GVHD;无关供者及haplo-HSCT采用霉酚酸酯(MMF)+CsA+短程MTX预防GVHD。同胞全相合移植自−2 d开始、无关供者及haplo-HSCT自−6 d开始CsA 2 mg·kg−1·d−1持续24 h静脉滴注,维持200~250 µg/L并根据GVHD个体化调整。MTX 15 mg·m−2·d−1,+1 d;MTX 10 mg·m−2·d−1,+3 d、+6 d、+11 d。MMF −6 d开始15 mg·m−2·d−1,每12 h口服1次,至+30 d开始减量,未发生GVHD者至+60 d停用。发生Ⅱ度以上急性GVHD时予以甲泼尼龙,疗效欠佳时者予以他克莫司、抗CD25单抗、ATG、间充质干细胞、芦可替尼等。 4.病毒感染的预防:移植前供、患者均接受巨细胞病毒(CMV)及EB病毒(EBV)抗体检测。所有患者均从预处理开始至−2 d予以更昔洛韦10 mg·kg−1·d−1预防性抗病毒治疗。+1 d开始予以口服阿昔洛韦抗病毒治疗。移植后6个月内每周检测1~2次CMV-DNA、EBV-DNA,CMV-DNA>1×103拷贝/ml者予以更昔洛韦10 mg·kg−1·d−1或膦甲酸钠90 mg·kg−1·d−1抢先治疗,EBV-DNA>1×103拷贝/ml者予以利妥昔单抗100 mg/m2抢先治疗。 5.移植相关并发症的预防及治疗:应用前列腺素E1预防肝静脉闭塞病。 6.植入标准及MRD监测:ANC>0.5×109/L连续3 d为粒细胞植入;PLT>20×109/L连续7 d且脱离输注为血小板植入。+30 d行检测骨髓细胞形态学、MRD,短串联重复序列多态性(STR)检测植入状态。植活后每3~4周复查骨髓细胞形态学、MRD及STR检测。 7.随访:采用门诊、住院复查、电话随访及检索病例的方式进行随访。随访截止日期为2018年12月30日。中位随访时间为8(4~12)个月。总生存时间(OS)为造血干细胞回输日至死亡或随访终点。DFS时间为移植后获得CR至疾病复发、死亡或随访终点。复发时间为移植后至疾病复发。 8.统计学处理:采用SPSS17.0软件进行统计分析、采用Kaplan-Meier法计算GVHD累积发生率、生存率、复发率及移植相关死亡率并绘制生存曲线,采用Log-rank检验比较组间差异,P<0.05为差异有统计学意义。

结果

1.患者基本资料:12例患者中,男9例,女3例,中位年龄36(27~50)岁,<40岁8例,≥40岁4例。AML伴重现性细胞学异常5例[AML伴BCR/ABL 1例,AML伴t(8;21)2例,AML伴t(9;11)1例,AML伴CEBPA 1例],非特指性AML 7例(M2 2例,M5 5例)。细胞遗传学高危患者6例,中危患者5例。11例检出FLT3-ITD、C-kit、IDH2、TET-2、DNMT3ARUNX1、ASLX1等突变。移植前化疗中位疗程数为6(2~13)个。移植前部分缓解(PR)9例,未缓解(NR)3例,原发耐药6例,复发6例。3例NR患者中原发耐药1例,复发2例。移植前骨髓原始细胞≤20%、≥20%分别为9、3例。 2.移植特征及造血重建情况:11例患者移植后获得重建,1例发生原发植入失败,中性粒细胞植入中位时间为15(15~21)d,血小板植入中位时间为19(17~30)d。回输单个核细胞、CD34+细胞中位数分别为8.25(4.56~13.60)×108/kg、5.65(2.10~8.65)×106/kg。所有患者+30 d复查骨髓象、MRD均提示CR状态,其中11例患者为完全供者嵌合(STR 100%)。具体移植相关情况见表1。
表1

12例难治/复发急性髓系白血病患者异基因造血干细胞移植相关情况

移植指标结果
HLA相合度(例)
 亲缘10/10全相合3
 无关供者9/10相合1
 单倍型5/10相合8
供、患者性别组合(例)
 男供男6
 男供女2
 女供男3
 女供女1
供、患者血型(例)
 相合5
 主要不合2
 次要不合3
 主次不合2
造血干细胞来源(例)
 外周血7
 外周血+骨髓+脐血5
预处理含ATG(例)
 是9
 否3
GVHD预防(例)
 CsA+MTX3
 CsA+MMF+MTX9
回输MNC[×108/kg,M(范围)]8.25(4.56~13.60)
回输CD34+细胞[×106/kg,M(范围)]5.65(2.10~8.65)
粒细胞植入时间[d,M(范围)]15(15~21)
血小板植入时间[d,M(范围)]19(17~30)

注:ATG:兔抗人胸腺细胞免疫球蛋白;CsA:环孢素A;MTX:甲氨蝶呤;MMF:霉酚酸酯;MNC:单个核细胞

注:ATG:兔抗人胸腺细胞免疫球蛋白;CsA:环孢素A;MTX:甲氨蝶呤;MMF:霉酚酸酯;MNC:单个核细胞 3.移植后疗效:11例患者的中位OS时间为8(4~12)个月,12例患者移植后均达CR。2例(16.6%)患者分别在移植后6、12个月出现复发,1例未行挽救治疗,1例MRD转阳后予以干扰素联合IL-2及供者淋巴细胞输注(DLI)治疗达CR后再次复发。 4.GVHD及移植相关并发症:12例患者中,3例在移植后3个月内发生Ⅱ/Ⅲ度急性GVHD,予以调整免疫抑制剂后均好转。移植3个月后9例患者发生慢性GVHD,均为局限型,多累及皮肤、肝脏及口腔。所有患者预处理期间均发生呕吐及轻度腹泻等胃肠道反应,对症处理后缓解。粒细胞植入前发生肺感染1例、血流感染3例,抗细菌及抗真菌治疗后好转。2例患者+40 d发生出血性膀胱炎,予以抗病毒及水化、碱化、利尿对症治疗后好转。1例患者于+60 d发生EBV血症及CMV血症,予以小剂量利妥昔单抗及更昔洛韦联合CMV特异性静脉丙种球蛋白治疗后转阴,+180 d因重症肺感染死亡。未发生肝静脉闭塞症。 5.生存分析:截至随访结束,12例患者中9例存活,预期移植后1年OS率为(71.1±1.8)%,DFS率为(62.2±1.8)%。3例患者死亡,移植相关死亡率为27.2%,死亡原因:原发病复发2例,重症肺感染1例。

讨论

难治/复发AML患者预后较差,其1、3年OS率均低于25%[10]。有研究表明,移植前CR患者无白血病生存(LFS)率、复发率分别为58%、42%,明显优于NR患者(22.5%、55%)[11]–[12]。因此,足够强度的清髓性预处理方案及可耐受的预处理相关不良反应成为提高难治/复发AML患者疗效的关键平衡点。 对于难治/复发AML患者,单纯采用Bu-Cy预处理方案,移植后复发率仍较高[13];而给予细胞毒药物序贯改良Bu-Cy方案,能够促进肿瘤细胞快速进入细胞周期,从而最大限度提高化疗敏感度,清除残存白血病细胞[4]–[5]。去甲氧柔红霉素序贯改良Bu-Cy方案较改良Bu-Cy方案明显降低移植后复发率并改善生存[14],FLAG序贯改良Bu-Cy方案用于难治/复发AML也取得了较好的疗效[15]。 FLAG方案为难治/复发AML的标准治疗方案,其CR率约为40%[16]。CLAG方案作为难治/复发AML的另一种可选方案,被NCCN指南推荐为一线挽救性治疗[17]。与氟达拉滨相比,克拉屈滨单药治疗AML有效[17]。段明辉等[7]应用GLAG方案治疗33例难治/复发AML,1疗程CR率达78.8%;Holowiecki等[18]在标准柔红霉素联合阿糖胞苷基础上分别加用氟达拉滨及克拉屈滨,克拉屈滨组CR率及OS率明显提高。 基于以上研究,我们尝试采用含克拉屈滨、阿糖胞苷序贯白消安预处理方案allo-HSCT治疗12例难治/复发AML患者,11例移植后获得造血重建及完全供者嵌合,+30 d骨髓象、MRD均提示达CR状态,移植后预期1年OS率为(71.1±1.8)%,DFS率为(62.2±1.8)%。预处理相关不良反应主要为呕吐及轻度腹泻等胃肠道反应。 综上,本组病例资料显示,含克拉屈滨预处理allo-HSCT治疗难治/复发AML患者具有良好的近期疗效,预处理相关不良反应、移植相关风险及移植后相关并发症发生率可接受。上述结论尚需大样本量临床研究加以验证。
  18 in total

1.  Aspergillus tracheobronchitis after allogeneic bone marrow transplantation.

Authors:  S van Assen; G P Bootsma; P E Verweij; J P Donnelly; J M Raemakers
Journal:  Bone Marrow Transplant       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 5.483

2.  [The consensus of allogeneic hematopoietic transplantation for hematological diseases in China (2014)--indication, conditioning regimen and donor selection].

Authors: 
Journal:  Zhonghua Xue Ye Xue Za Zhi       Date:  2014-08

3.  Cladribine, but not fludarabine, added to daunorubicin and cytarabine during induction prolongs survival of patients with acute myeloid leukemia: a multicenter, randomized phase III study.

Authors:  Jerzy Holowiecki; Sebastian Grosicki; Sebastian Giebel; Tadeusz Robak; Slawomira Kyrcz-Krzemien; Kazimierz Kuliczkowski; Aleksander B Skotnicki; Andrzej Hellmann; Kazimierz Sulek; Anna Dmoszynska; Janusz Kloczko; Wieslaw W Jedrzejczak; Barbara Zdziarska; Krzysztof Warzocha; Krystyna Zawilska; Mieczyslaw Komarnicki; Marek Kielbinski; Beata Piatkowska-Jakubas; Agnieszka Wierzbowska; Malgorzata Wach; Olga Haus
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2012-04-16       Impact factor: 44.544

4.  Superior graft-versus-leukemia effect associated with transplantation of haploidentical compared with HLA-identical sibling donor grafts for high-risk acute leukemia: an historic comparison.

Authors:  Yu Wang; Dai-Hong Liu; Lan-Ping Xu; Kai-Yan Liu; Huan Chen; Yu-Hong Chen; Wei Han; Hong-Xia Shi; Xiao-Jun Huang
Journal:  Biol Blood Marrow Transplant       Date:  2010-09-08       Impact factor: 5.742

5.  [The comparative study of the effects between modified FLAG and CAG on relapsed or refractory acute myeloid leukemia].

Authors:  Tao Wang; Liangming Ma; Qiujuan Zhu; Rong Gong; Zhilin Gao; Weiwei Tian
Journal:  Zhonghua Xue Ye Xue Za Zhi       Date:  2014-11

6.  Allogeneic transplantation from HLA-matched sibling or partially HLA-mismatched related donors for primary refractory acute leukemia.

Authors:  S Singhal; R Powles; P J Henslee-Downey; K Y Chiang; J Treleaven; K Godder; S Kulkarni; F van Rhee; B Sirohi; C R Pinkerton; S Meller; J Mehta
Journal:  Bone Marrow Transplant       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 5.483

7.  Cladribine in the treatment of acute myeloid leukemia: a single-institution experience.

Authors:  Mike G Martin; John S Welch; Kristan Augustin; Lindsay Hladnik; John F DiPersio; Camille N Abboud
Journal:  Clin Lymphoma Myeloma       Date:  2009-08

8.  Timed sequential chemotherapy for previously treated patients with acute myeloid leukemia: long-term follow-up of the etoposide, mitoxantrone, and cytarabine-86 trial.

Authors:  E Archimbaud; X Thomas; V Leblond; M Michallet; P Fenaux; C Cordonnier; F Dreyfus; X Troussard; J Jaubert; P Travade
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  1995-01       Impact factor: 44.544

9.  [Efficacy and safety analysis of the combination of cladribine, cytarabine, granulocyte colonystimulating factor (CLAG) regime in patients with refractory or relapsed acute myeloid leukemia].

Authors:  M H Duan; Y Zhang; M Zhang; X Han; Y Zhang; C Yang; J Feng; L Zhang; W Zhang; J Li; L P Tian; Y Zhang; D B Zhou
Journal:  Zhonghua Xue Ye Xue Za Zhi       Date:  2016-07

10.  [The guidelines for diagnosis and treatment of acute myelogenous leukemia (relapse/refractory) in China (2017)].

Authors: 
Journal:  Zhonghua Xue Ye Xue Za Zhi       Date:  2017-03-14
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.