| Literature DB >> 31775383 |
Joanne S Kays1, Bryan K Yamamoto1.
Abstract
RNA sequencing (RNAseq) can be a powerful tool in the identification of transcriptional changes after drug treatment. RNAseq was utilized to determine expression changes in Fluorescence-activated cell sorted (FACS) CD11b/c+ cells from the striatum (STR) and prefrontal cortex (PFC) of male Sprague-Dawley rats after a methamphetamine (METH) binge dosing regimen. Resident microglia and infiltrating macrophages were collected 2 h or 3 days after drug administration. Gene expression changes indicated there was an increase toward an overall pro-inflammatory state, or M1 polarization, along with what appears to be a subset of cells that differentiated toward the anti-inflammatory M2 polarization. In general, there were significantly more mRNA expression changes in the STR than the PFC and more at 2 h post-binge METH than at 3 days post-binge METH. Additionally, Ingenuity® Pathway Analysis along with details of RNA expression changes revealed cyclo-oxygenase 2 (COX2)-driven prostaglandin (PG) E2 synthesis, glutamine uptake, and the Nuclear factor erythroid2-related factor 2 (NRF2) canonical pathway in microglia were associated with the binge administration regimen of METH.Entities:
Keywords: RNA sequencing; inflammation; macrophage; methamphetamine; microglia
Year: 2019 PMID: 31775383 PMCID: PMC6955783 DOI: 10.3390/brainsci9120340
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Brain Sci ISSN: 2076-3425
Figure 1Representative gating strategy to collect CD11b/c+ cells (P3) by FACS for RNA sequencing. (a) forward scatter height vs. forward scatter area plot to isolate single cells (P1) from doublets; (b) side scatter vs. forward scatter plot to isolate cells (P2) from debris; (c) fluorescence intensity plot to isolate Cd11b/c-PE labeled cells (P3).
Number of genes with differential expression methamphetamine (METH) vs. saline, false discovery rate (FDR) < 0.05 unpaired t-test. PFC: prefrontal cortex; STR: striatum; FC: fold change.
| 2 h Post METH | 3 Day Post METH | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
| Considering All FC’s with FDR < 0.05. | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
| Up | Down | Up | Down | Up | Down | Up | Down | |
| 1537 | 1581 | 2435 | 2048 | 0 | 0 | 400 | 314 | |
| Considering FC’s > 2 or <−2 with FDR < 0.05. | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
| Up | Down | Up | Down | Up | Down | Up | Down | |
| 436 | 498 | 840 | 691 | 0 | 0 | 41 | 37 | |
Figure 2Distribution of significantly-changed genes FDR <0.05, 2 h post METH, in the STR and PFC. (a) all significantly changed genes; (b) significantly upregulated genes; (c) significantly downregulated genes. The relative number of significantly-changed genes are represented by the size of the circles. Genes significantly-changed in the prefrontal cortex are shown by blue circles while those from the striatum are shown by yellow circles. Genes shared by both regions are depicted by the overlapping area between the two circles in an olive color. Note that the striatum has the larger number of gene changes compared to the prefrontal cortex and that about 80% of the genes changed by METH in the PFC were also changed in the STR.
Genes common to PFC and STR with opposite differential expression METH vs. saline, 2 h time point, FDR <0.05 unpaired t-test.
| Symbol | Gene Name | Fold Change PFC 2 h | Fold Change STR 2 h |
|---|---|---|---|
|
| Glutamate Ionotropic Receptor Kainate Type Subunit 5 | 3.39 | −2.74 |
|
| Plasminogen Activator, Urokinase | −2.25 | 4.04 |
|
| Integrin Subunit Beta 3 | −1.58 | 1.52 |
|
| Transmembrane Protein 120A | −1.30 | 1.40 |
|
| Misato Mitochondrial Distribution and Morphology Regulator 1 | −1.31 | 1.29 |
Genes in STR with significant differential expression at both 2 h and 3 day time points, fold changes <−2 or >+2.
| Genes Upregulated at Both Time Points | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Symbol | Gene Name | Fold Change 2 h | Fold Change 3 day |
|
| solute carrier family 6 member 12 | 16.60 | 2.75 |
|
| colony stimulating factor 1 | 12.52 | 2.41 |
|
| Cd5 molecule | 3.40 | 2.29 |
|
| fibronectin 1 | 3.14 | 2.65 |
|
| adhesion G protein-coupled receptor G5 | 2.81 | 2.30 |
|
| similar to paired immunoglobin-like type 2 receptor beta | 2.67 | 3.15 |
|
| |||
| Symbol | Gene Name | Fold Change 2 h | Fold Change 3 day |
|
| G protein-coupled receptor 12 | −5.74 | −2.72 |
|
| glucosidase, beta, acid 3 | −5.40 | −4.78 |
|
| ripply transcriptional repressor 3 | −2.88 | −2.13 |
|
| syntrophin, beta 1 | −2.87 | −2.00 |
|
| transmembrane protein 53 | −2.49 | −2.18 |
|
| DNA replication and sister chromatid cohesion 1 | −2.44 | −2.36 |
|
| |||
| Symbol | Gene Name | Fold Change 2 h | Fold Change 3 day |
|
| heparin-binding EGF-like growth factor | 17.55 | −3.16 |
|
| BCL2, apoptosis regulator | 3.74 | −2.14 |
|
| arginine vasopressin receptor 1A | 2.71 | −2.15 |
|
| spermatogenesis associated 22 | 2.40 | −4.78 |
|
| cyclin D2 | 2.31 | −2.75 |
|
| |||
| Symbol | Gene Name | Fold Change 2 h | Fold Change 3 day |
|
| immunoglobulin superfamily containing leucine-rich repeat | −9.94 | 3.02 |
|
| similar to cystatin E2 | −6.14 | 2.23 |
|
| fibronectin type III domain containing 1 | −3.33 | 3.80 |
|
| hemochromatosis | −2.62 | 2.21 |
Ingenuity® Pathway Analysis of significantly changed genes within each brain region and time point.
| Top Canonical Pathways | Top Upstream Regulators | Top Molecular and Cellular Functions | |
|---|---|---|---|
| STR 2 h post-METH, FDR <0.05 | NRF2-mediated oxidative stress response | Lipopolysaccharide | Cell death and survival |
| Aryl hydrocarbon receptor signaling | PDGF BB | Cellular movement | |
| Unfolded protein response | Beta-estradiol | Cellular development | |
| Aldosterone signaling in epithelial cells | HSF1 | Cellular growth and proliferation | |
| LXR/RXR activation | TNF | Cell morphology | |
| PFC 2 h post-METH, FDR <0.05 | Aldosterone signaling in epithelial cells | Lipopolysaccharide | Cellular movement |
| Unfolded protein response | IFNG | Cell death and survival | |
| Atherosclerosis signaling | TGFB1 | Protein synthesis | |
| Granulocyte adhesion and diapedesis | IL1B | Cellular function and maintenance | |
| IL-10 signaling | PDGF BB | Cellular development | |
| STR 3 day post-METH, FDR <0.05 | EIF2 signaling | TCR | RNA post-transcriptional modification |
| Regulation of eIF4 and p70S6K signaling | ERBB2 | Protein synthesis | |
| mTOR signaling | DOT1L | Cell death and survival | |
| Type I diabetes mellitus signaling | EBI3 | Gene expression | |
| T helper cell differentiation | DRAP1 | DNA replication, recombination, and repair | |
| PFC 3 day post-METH, FDR <0.05 | N/A | N/A | N/A |
Ingenuity® Pathway Analysis of significantly changed genes in STR at both 2 h and 3 days post-METH.
| Top Canonical Pathways | Top Upstream Regulators | Top Molecular and Cellular Functions | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Upregulated at both 2 h and 3 day post-METH | EIF2 signaling | TCR | RNA post-transcriptional modification |
| Regulation of eIF4 and p70S6K signaling | DOT1L | Protein synthesis | |
| mTOR signaling | HSP90B1 | Gene expression | |
| Hepatic fibrosis/hepatic stellate cell activation | miR-542-3p (miRNAs w/seed GUGACAG) | Cell morphology | |
| Complement system | ELAVL1 | Cell-to-cell signaling and interaction | |
| Downregulated at both 2 h and 3 day post-METH | Tryptophan degradation to 2-amino-3-carboxymuconate semialdehyde | BHLHA15 | Cellular assembly and organization |
| NAD biosynthesis II (from tryptophan) | SOX11 | DNA replication, recombination, and repair | |
| Leukotriene biosynthesis | ERBB2 | Cell cycle | |
| -Glutamyl cycle | NAMPT | Cellular growth and proliferation | |
| Mismatch repair in eukaryotes | CERS6 | Cell morphology | |
| Upregulated at 2 h and downregulated at 3 day | -Linolenate biosynthesis II (animals) | FAM103A1 | Cellular assembly and organization |
| Myc mediated apoptosis signaling | IKBKE | DNA replication, Recombination and repair | |
| Glycine biosynthesis I | PIM1 | Cell morphology | |
| Pancreatic adenocarcinoma signaling | RELB | Cell death and survival | |
| S-adenosyl-L-methionine biosynthesis | NFKB2 | Cell cycle | |
| Downregulated at 2 h and upregulated at 3 day | NAD salvage pathway II | NDRG1 | Lipid metabolism |
| IL-22 signaling | COL18A1 | Small molecule biochemistry | |
| Natural killer cell signaling | CDK4 | Cell morphology | |
| PI3K/AKT signaling | PDLIM2 | Cellular function and maintenance | |
| Interferon signaling | CLDN7 | Cell death and survival |
RNAseq data for top 25 genes enriched in microglia [32]. (U) = unique to microglia vs. oligodentrocyes, astrocytes, and neurons. Bold text = change in expression FDR <0.05 METH vs. Saline treatment. ND = not detected. NS = not significant.
| Symbol | Gene Name | STR Average log2cpm Saline ( | STR Fold Change, FDR 2 h METH vs. Saline | PFC Average log2cpm Saline ( | PFC Fold Change, FDR 2 h METH vs. Saline | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
| transmembrane protein 119 | 11.24, 11.04 | −1.19, 0.39 (NS) | 11.28, 11.38 | 1.11, 0.72 (NS) | |||
| Fc receptor-like 2 | 10.04, 9.81 | −1.08, 0.83 (NS) | 10.51, 10.44 | −1.11, 0.81 (NS) | |||
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
| hexosaminidase subunit beta | 12.68, 12.48 | −1.14, 0.23 (NS) | 12.77, 12.49 | −1.20, 0.11 (NS) | |||
|
|
|
|
| 14.70, 15.05 | 1.29, 0.06 (NS) | ||
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
|
|
| 1.21, 0.11 (NS) |
|
| ||
|
| colony stimulating factor 1 receptor | 13.48, 13.62 | 1.10, 0.54 (NS) | 13.42, 13.51 | 1.03, 0.85 (NS) | ||
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
|
|
|
| 12.17, 11.73 | −1.31, 0.11 (NS) | ||
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
| complement C1q C chain | 11.01, 11.30 | 1.20, 0.15 (NS) | 10.85, 11.40 | 1.49, 0.11 (NS) | ||
|
|
|
|
| 6.41, 6.74 | 1.27, 0.24 (NS) | ||
| transforming growth factor, beta receptor 1 | 10.46, 10.39 | −1.04, 0.80 (NS) | 10.60, 10.50 | −1.08, 0.62 (NS) | |||
|
| Fc fragment of IgG receptor Ia | 7.45, 7.15 | −1.17, 0.33 (NS) | 7.40, 7.23 | −1.12, 0.50 (NS) | ||
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
|
|
|
| 8.43, 8.07 | −1.23, 0.06 (NS) | ||
|
| early growth response 1 | 8.36, 8.81 | 1.91, 0.23 (NS) | 8.30, 7.67 | −1.39, 0,45 (NS) | ||
|
| sialic acid binding Ig like lectin H | ND | ND | ND | ND | ||
|
| C-C motif chemokine ligand 2 | 5.57, 6.34 | 2.15, 0.17 (NS) | 5.66, 5.62 | 1.03, 0.97 (NS) | ||
|
| lymphocyte activating 3 | 3.84, 3.80 | 1.01, 0.98 (NS) | 3.83, 3.65 | −1.16, 0.63 (NS) | ||
|
| FBJ osteosarcoma oncogene | 7.21, 7.31 | 1.09, 0.92 (NS) | 8.45, 8.37 | 1.14, 0.86 (NS) | ||
|
| |||||||
|
|
|
|
| ||||
| 3.93 | 3.91 | 4.13 | 4.14 | ||||
| STR, Saline Top 25 genes | STR, METH Top 25 genes | PFC, METH Top 25 genes | PFC, METH Top 25 genes | ||||
| 9.34 | 9.16 | 9.38 | 9.25 | ||||
Average log2cpm of genes unique to mouse brain microglia or peritoneal macrophages as per Hickman et al. [34].
| STR Average Saline Microglial log2cpm ( | STR Average METH Microglial log2cpm ( | PFC Average Saline Microglial log2cpm ( | PFC Average METH Microglial log2cpm ( | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mouse Microglial Unique Genes | 8.06 | 7.53 | 8.49 | 7.94 |
| Mouse Macrophage Unique Genes | 1.51 | 1.95 | 1.38 | 2.32 |
Literature-cited M1 or M2 microglial genes/proteins compared to RNAseq data. Green-font rows indicate significant change in expression that is directionally in agreement with literature citations. Yellow-font rows indicate significantly changed RNAseq genes that are closely related to literature-cited genes. ND = not detected. NS = not significant.
| Symbol | Gene Name | M1/M2 | Source | Brain Region | Average Log2 cpm Sal, METH | Fold Change | FDR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| C-C motif chemokine ligand 2 | M1 | Zhou | STR | 5.57, 6.34 | 2.15 | 0.17 (NS) |
| PFC | 5.66, 5.62 | 1.03 | 0.97 (NS) | ||||
|
| C-C motif chemokine ligand 5 | M1 | Chhor | STR | ND, ND | ND | |
| PFC | ND, ND | ND | |||||
|
| C-C Motif Chemokine Receptor 7 | M1 | Barakat | STR | ND, ND | ND | |
| PFC | −4.59, −2.62 | 1.84 | 0.74 (NS) | ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
|
| Fc Fragment Of IgE Receptor II | M1 | Barakat | STR | ND, ND | ND | |
| PFC | ND, ND | ND | |||||
|
| Fc fragment of IgG, low affinity IIa, receptor | M1 | Barakat, Zhou, Peng | STR | 7.16, 7.79 | 1.58 | 9.6 × 10−7 |
| PFC | 7.25, 7.96 | 1.67 | 1.7 × 10−5 | ||||
|
| Cd40 molecule | M1 | Barakat | STR | 6.08, 5.45 | −1.46 | 0.13 (NS) |
| PFC | 6.29, 5.30 | −1.97 | 1.9 × 10−9 | ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
|
| Cd86 molecule | M1 | Barakat, Zhou, Peng | STR | 6.68, 6.47 | −1.13 | 0.29 (NS) |
| PFC | 6.54, 6.57 | 1.11 | 0.41 (NS) | ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
|
| adhesion G protein-coupled receptor E1 | M1 | Barakat | STR | 10.32, 10.05 | −1.2 | 0.06 (NS) |
| PFC | 10.47, 10.35 | −1.1 | 0.47 (NS) | ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
|
| Interleukin 2 | M1 | Chhor | STR | ND, ND | ND | |
| PFC | ND, ND | ND | |||||
|
| interleukin 6 | M1 | Barakat, Chhor, Zhou | STR | 3.05, 2.62 | −1.26 | 0.35 (NS) |
| PFC | 3.13, 3.33 | 1.17 | 0.58 (NS) | ||||
|
| interleukin 12 | M1 | Barakat, Chhor | STR | 5.04, 4.52 | −1.36 | 0.045 |
| PFC | 4.89, 4.47 | −1.25 | 0.32 (NS) | ||||
|
| interferon gamma | M1 | Chhor | STR | ND, ND | ND | |
| PFC | ND, ND | ND | |||||
|
| nitric oxide synthase 2 | M1 | Barakat, Chhor | STR | ND, ND | ND | |
| PFC | ND, ND | ND | |||||
|
| major histocompatibility class II | M1 | Barakat, Peng | STR | ND, ND | ND | |
| PFC | ND, ND | ND | |||||
|
| tumor necrosis factor | M1 | Barakat, Chhor, Zhou | STR | 1.19, 0.89 | −1.26 | 0.49 (NS) |
| PFC | 0.96, 0.46 | −1.26 | 0.65 (NS) | ||||
|
| |||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
|
|
|
| ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||
|
| Arginase 1 | M2 | Cherry, Chhor | STR | ND, ND | ND | |
| PFC | ND, ND | ND | |||||
|
| C-C motif chemokine ligand 2 | M2 | Chhor | STR | 5.57, 6.34 | 2.15 | 0.17 (NS) |
| PFC | 5.66, 5.62 | 1.03 | 0.97 (NS) | ||||
|
| C-C Motif Chemokine Receptor 2 | M2 | Chhor | STR | ND, ND | ND | |
| PFC | ND, ND | ND | |||||
|
| CD163 molecule | M2 | Barakat, Cherry | STR | ND, ND | ND | |
| PFC | −2.16, 2.13 | 7.21 | 0.11 (NS) | ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
|
| CD209 molecule | M2 | Barakat | STR | ND, ND | ND | |
| PFC | ND, ND | ND | |||||
|
| CD36 molecule | M2 | Barakat | STR | −2.79, −2.13 | 1.12 | 0.88 (NS) |
| PFC | −2.15, −0.79 | 1.91 | 0.42 (NS) | ||||
|
| Cd68 molecule | M2 | Barakat | STR | 6.83, 6.68 | −1.11 | 0.38 (NS) |
| PFC | 6.70, 6.49 | −1.14 | 0.28 (NS) | ||||
|
| C-X-C motif chemokine receptor 3 | M2 | Chhor | STR | 2.49, 1.61 | −1.53 | 0.21 (NS) |
| PFC | 2.79, 2.15 | −1.54 | 0.01 | ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| PFC | 1.22, 2.75 | 3.02 | 0.006 | ||||
|
| Resistin Like Beta | M2 | Barakat, Cherry, Chhor | STR | ND, ND | ND | |
| PFC | ND, ND | ND | |||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
|
| Colony Stimulating Factor 3 | M2 | Chhor | STR | ND, ND | ND | |
| PFC | ND, ND | ND | |||||
|
| Colony Stimulating Factor 2 | M2 | Chhor | STR | ND, ND | ND | |
| PFC | ND, ND | ND | |||||
|
| |||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
|
|
|
| ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
|
| |||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
|
|
|
| ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
|
|
|
| ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
|
|
|
| ||||
|
| Interleukin 4 | M2 | Barakat, Chhor | STR | ND, ND | ND | |
| PFC | ND, ND | ND | |||||
|
| Interleukin 4 Receptor | M2 | Chhor | STR | 8.12, 8.41 | 1.25 | 0.21 (NS) |
| PFC | 8.11, 8.39 | 1.23 | 0.16 (NS) | ||||
|
| Interleukin10 | M2 | Barakat, Chhor | STR | ND, ND | ND | |
| PFC | ND, ND | ND | |||||
|
| |||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
|
|
|
| ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
|
|
|
| ||||
|
| Interleukin13 | M2 | Barakat | STR | ND, ND | ND | |
| PFC | ND, ND | ND | |||||
|
| |||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
|
|
|
| ||||
|
| C-type lectin domain family 10, member A | M2 | Cherry | STR | −0.89, −0.36 | −1.19 | 0.75 (NS) |
| PFC | 1.78, 3.67 | 4.08 | 0.08 (NS) | ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
|
| suppressor of cytokine signaling 3 | M2 | Chhor | STR | 5.31, 5.49 | 1.04 | 0.91 (NS) |
| PFC | 5.71, 6.13 | 1.34 | 0.29 (NS) | ||||
|
| Sphingosine Kinase 1 | M2 | Chhor | STR | ND, ND | ND | |
| PFC | ND, ND | ND | |||||
|
| sphingosine kinase 2 | M2 | Chhor | STR | 5.90, 6.02 | 1.1 | 0.37 (NS) |
| PFC | 6.05, 6.23 | 1.14 | 0.30 (NS) | ||||
| M2 | Barakat, Chhor | ||||||
|
| transforming growth factor, beta 1 | STR | 6.14, 6.14 | −1.09 | 0.62 (NS) | ||
| PFC | 6.34, 6.40 | 1 | 1.00 (NS) | ||||
|
| transforming growth factor, beta 2 | STR | −1.15, −1.34 | −1.14 | 0.80 (NS) | ||
| PFC | ND, ND | ND | |||||
|
| transforming growth factor, beta 3 | STR | −0.63, −1.79 | −1.27 | 0.72 (NS) | ||
| PFC | −0.93, −1.46 | −1.24 | 0.77 (NS) | ||||
|
| triggering receptor expressed on myeloid cells 2 | M2 | Cherry | STR | 10.50, 9.06 | −2.58 | 1.30 × 10−8 |
| PFC | 10.59, 8.88 | −3.18 | 6.1 × 10−14 | ||||
|
| chitinase 3 like 3 | M2 | Barakat, Cherry, Chhor | STR | ND, ND | ND | |
| PFC | ND, ND | ND |
Figure 3Genes for prostaglandin (PG) and leukotrienes (LT) biosynthetic enzymes and LT receptors in 2 h post METH STR microglia. METH treatment appears to direct the release of arachidonic acid from cell membrane phospholipids toward synthesis of prostaglandins and leukotriene B4 which are known to have roles in inflammation. Downregulation or lack of detection of RNA for all leukotriene receptors [43] suggests that microglia are less responsive to leukotrienes post-binge METH. Changes in gene expression for enzymes and receptors are denoted by italic text and color: Black = not detected. Green = no significant change. Red = significant upregulation. Blue = significant downregulation. Gene expression data can be found in Table S1.
Figure 4Genes for biosynthetic enzymes and receptors for PG’s, TxA2, and HETE’s in 2 h post METH STR microglia. METH treatment seems to direct the release of arachidonic acid from cell membrane phospholipids particularly toward synthesis of PGE2 over any of the other possible cyclooxygenase- or lipoxygenase-derived products. In addition, METH provides a means by which PGE2 can act in an autocrine fashion with the concurrent upregulation of genes for PGE2 receptors EP2 and EP4. Changes in gene expression are denoted by italic text and color: Black = not detected. Green = no significant change. Red = significant upregulation. Blue = significant downregulation. Gene expression data can be found in Table S2.
Figure 5RNAseq genes associated with NRF2-mediated oxidative stress response via IPA®. Toxic doses of METH can produce oxidative stress in the rodent brain. In the rat striatum 2 h post METH, IPA® showed that the upregulation of a number of genes associated with oxidative stress are under the control of NRF2, which is itself upregulated by METH. Among the upstream mediators which can initiate this pathway are drugs, cytokines prostaglandins, and bacterial infections. RNAseq data showed that Il1a, Il1b, and the enzymes which can enhance synthesis of PGE2 are also upregulated by METH and could contribute to initiating the NRF2-mediated oxidative stress response. Red symbols = upregulated genes. Green symbols = downregulated genes. Gene expression data can be found in Table S3.
Figure 6Hypothesized pathway and consequences of glutamine uptake in 2 h post METH STR microglia. Binge dose METH leads to neuronal release of glutamate. Glutamate is taken up by astrocytes, converted to glutamine, and released to the extracellular space. Upregulation of genes for several glutamine transporters suggests the enhanced uptake of glutamine by microglia. The potential increased levels of glutamine would stoichiometrically be converted to glutamate and ammonia [83]. The resulting enhanced levels of glutamate may be met by the enhanced expression of Gclc, the gene for the first rate-limiting enzyme in glutathione synthesis, and enhanced expression of Slc7a11, the gene for a cystine/glutamate transporter. This combination may drive the enhanced synthesis of γ-glutamylcysteine and the reduced form of glutathione (GSH). The utility of GSH to participate in detoxifying reactive species may be thwarted by the concurrent downregulation of genes for several glutathione-S-transferases (GSTs). Enhanced expression of Sod1 via the IPA-predicted enhancement NRF2 signaling may serve to partially reduce the amounts of METH-generated reactive oxygen species. However, there is incomplete conversion of the resulting toxic hydrogen peroxide to water and alcohol and accompanying generation of oxidized glutathione due to the downregulation of genes for catalase (Cat) and glutathione peroxidase 8 (Gpx8), respectively. Other sources of toxic species resulting from enhanced uptake of glutamine by microglia could be the enhanced presence/release of ammonia after the conversion of glutamine to glutamate via the concurrent downregulation of glutamate dehydrogenase 1 (Glud1) as well as the enhanced export of glutamate via upregulated Slc7a11. Changes in gene expression are denoted by text color and font for the gene symbol: Green = no significant change. Red, bold = significant upregulation. Blue, bold = significant downregulation. Gene expression data can be found in Table S4.