Jennifer L Syvertsen1, Robin A Pollini2. 1. Department of Anthropology, University of California, Riverside, 900 University Ave, 1320B Watkins Hall, Riverside, CA 92521, United States. Electronic address: jsyverts@ucr.edu. 2. School of Medicine, Department of Behavioral Medicine and Psychiatry, School of Public Health, Department of Epidemiology, West Virginia University, PO Box 9151, 3606 Collins Ferry Road, Suite 201, Morgantown, WV 26506, United States; Pacific Institute of Research and Evaluation, 11720 Beltsville Dr #900, Beltsville, MD 20705, United States.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Sterile syringe access reduces injection-related health harms, yet access in the U.S. remains grossly inadequate. In California, syringe services programs (SSPs) are authorized mainly at the local level, and many communities remain underserved. State law also allows, but does not require, non-prescription syringe sales at pharmacies, but participation is low. We draw on the theoretical concept of "landscapes of antagonism" to examine how discordance between state and local decision-making contributes to uneven syringe access and health harms in California's Central Valley, where injection rates are high. METHODS: Our study took place in Fresno and Kern counties. We draw on participant observation and qualitative interviews with individuals who inject drugs and key informants to examine issues around syringe access. RESULTS: Overall, 8 key informants represented harm reduction, medical, and faith-based organizations. Among 46 people who inject drugs, mean age was 39 (range: 20-65), 37% were female, and 37% self-identified as Latino. About half of individuals at each site had ever successfully purchased from pharmacies, but limited locations and perceived judgement from pharmacy staff posed common barriers. There was no SSP in Kern County due to political opposition; Fresno's SSP has been run by volunteers for more than 20 years despite opposition, and recently gained authorization. Reflecting this disparity, all but two individuals in Fresno accessed syringes from the SSP, whereas only one person in Kern had ever been to an SSP. To fill gaps in access in both sites, individuals obtained syringes that were often already used from diabetics, friends, and people on the street, sharing and reusing syringes at dangerously high rates. CONCLUSION: Landscapes of antagonism create syringe access inequities that threaten to exacerbate disease transmission and other health harms. Our study raises questions about accountability for the health of people who use drugs and suggests a need for political action.
BACKGROUND: Sterile syringe access reduces injection-related health harms, yet access in the U.S. remains grossly inadequate. In California, syringe services programs (SSPs) are authorized mainly at the local level, and many communities remain underserved. State law also allows, but does not require, non-prescription syringe sales at pharmacies, but participation is low. We draw on the theoretical concept of "landscapes of antagonism" to examine how discordance between state and local decision-making contributes to uneven syringe access and health harms in California's Central Valley, where injection rates are high. METHODS: Our study took place in Fresno and Kern counties. We draw on participant observation and qualitative interviews with individuals who inject drugs and key informants to examine issues around syringe access. RESULTS: Overall, 8 key informants represented harm reduction, medical, and faith-based organizations. Among 46 people who inject drugs, mean age was 39 (range: 20-65), 37% were female, and 37% self-identified as Latino. About half of individuals at each site had ever successfully purchased from pharmacies, but limited locations and perceived judgement from pharmacy staff posed common barriers. There was no SSP in Kern County due to political opposition; Fresno's SSP has been run by volunteers for more than 20 years despite opposition, and recently gained authorization. Reflecting this disparity, all but two individuals in Fresno accessed syringes from the SSP, whereas only one person in Kern had ever been to an SSP. To fill gaps in access in both sites, individuals obtained syringes that were often already used from diabetics, friends, and people on the street, sharing and reusing syringes at dangerously high rates. CONCLUSION: Landscapes of antagonism create syringe access inequities that threaten to exacerbate disease transmission and other health harms. Our study raises questions about accountability for the health of people who use drugs and suggests a need for political action.
Authors: Ryan J Deibert; Gary Goldbaum; Theodore R Parker; Holly Hagan; Robert Marks; Michael Hanrahan; Hanne Thiede Journal: Am J Public Health Date: 2006-06-29 Impact factor: 9.308
Authors: Cyprian Wejnert; Kristen L Hess; H Irene Hall; Michelle Van Handel; Demorah Hayes; Paul Fulton; Qian An; Linda J Koenig; Joseph Prejean; Linda A Valleroy Journal: MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep Date: 2016-12-02 Impact factor: 17.586
Authors: Peter J Davidson; Remedios Lozada; Perth C Rosen; Armando Macias; Manuel Gallardo; Robin A Pollini Journal: Int J Drug Policy Date: 2012-06-05
Authors: Esther J Aspinall; Dhanya Nambiar; David J Goldberg; Matthew Hickman; Amanda Weir; Eva Van Velzen; Norah Palmateer; Joseph S Doyle; Margaret E Hellard; Sharon J Hutchinson Journal: Int J Epidemiol Date: 2013-12-27 Impact factor: 7.196
Authors: E Childs; K B Biello; P K Valente; P Salhaney; D L Biancarelli; J Olson; J J Earlywine; B D L Marshall; A R Bazzi Journal: Int J Drug Policy Date: 2020-12-16