PURPOSE: To determine whether an anterior cruciate ligament (ACL)-reconstructed knee with hamstring autograft has a greater incidence of degenerative changes when an extra-articular reconstruction is added and to determine the effect of the combined reconstruction on knee stability and function at long-term follow-up. METHODS: For this retrospective study, patients who underwent ACL reconstruction between January 2002 and December 2003 were selected and classified into 2 groups, I and II. Group I consisted of patients operated by a standard ACL reconstruction, and group II consisted of patients in whom, owing to the presence of risk factors (severe pivot shift graded +++ or high-risk sports), an extra-articular reconstruction performed with ileo-tibial tract according to McIntosh as modified by Cocker Arnold technique, was used in conjunction with intra-articular ACL reconstruction. At final follow-up, Lysholm, International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC), and Tegner scores were used. An arthrometric KT-1000 evaluation was done. Comparative weight-bearing radiographs were taken, including a skyline view for the patellofemoral joint and analyzed according to Fairbank, Kellgren, and IKDC classification. RESULTS: Seventy-two of the 75 (96%) patients in group I and 68 of the 75 patients in group II were available at the final follow-up (minimum 10 years). Subjective scores improved significantly in both groups, with no significant difference. Objectively, the number of patients receiving C and D IKDC objective activity scores in group I (7/56; 12.5%) was significantly higher than in group II (0/60) (P = .01). Considering as a failure a side-to-side arthrometric difference more than 5 mm or a pivot shift test graded as ++ or +++, or any giving way episode occurring postoperatively, we found 8 cases in group I and no cases in group II (P = .01) despite the presence of risk factors that group I did not include. Radiologic evaluation showed less arthritic changes in group II in both tibiofemoral and patellofemoral joints. CONCLUSIONS: On the basis of the results of this study, adding an extra-articular reconstruction to an anatomically placed intra-articular ACL reconstruction, followed by a modern rehabilitation protocol, does not increase the risk of osteoarthritis and may be able to reduce the rate of failure. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, retrospective comparative study.
PURPOSE: To determine whether an anterior cruciate ligament (ACL)-reconstructed knee with hamstring autograft has a greater incidence of degenerative changes when an extra-articular reconstruction is added and to determine the effect of the combined reconstruction on knee stability and function at long-term follow-up. METHODS: For this retrospective study, patients who underwent ACL reconstruction between January 2002 and December 2003 were selected and classified into 2 groups, I and II. Group I consisted of patients operated by a standard ACL reconstruction, and group II consisted of patients in whom, owing to the presence of risk factors (severe pivot shift graded +++ or high-risk sports), an extra-articular reconstruction performed with ileo-tibial tract according to McIntosh as modified by Cocker Arnold technique, was used in conjunction with intra-articular ACL reconstruction. At final follow-up, Lysholm, International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC), and Tegner scores were used. An arthrometric KT-1000 evaluation was done. Comparative weight-bearing radiographs were taken, including a skyline view for the patellofemoral joint and analyzed according to Fairbank, Kellgren, and IKDC classification. RESULTS: Seventy-two of the 75 (96%) patients in group I and 68 of the 75 patients in group II were available at the final follow-up (minimum 10 years). Subjective scores improved significantly in both groups, with no significant difference. Objectively, the number of patients receiving C and D IKDC objective activity scores in group I (7/56; 12.5%) was significantly higher than in group II (0/60) (P = .01). Considering as a failure a side-to-side arthrometric difference more than 5 mm or a pivot shift test graded as ++ or +++, or any giving way episode occurring postoperatively, we found 8 cases in group I and no cases in group II (P = .01) despite the presence of risk factors that group I did not include. Radiologic evaluation showed less arthritic changes in group II in both tibiofemoral and patellofemoral joints. CONCLUSIONS: On the basis of the results of this study, adding an extra-articular reconstruction to an anatomically placed intra-articular ACL reconstruction, followed by a modern rehabilitation protocol, does not increase the risk of osteoarthritis and may be able to reduce the rate of failure. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, retrospective comparative study.
Authors: Eoghan T Hurley; David A Bloom; Alexander Hoberman; Utkarsh Anil; Guillem Gonzalez-Lomas; Eric J Strauss; Michael J Alaia Journal: Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc Date: 2021-01-23 Impact factor: 4.342
Authors: Willem A Kernkamp; Samuel K Van de Velde; Tsung-Yuan Tsai; Ewoud R A van Arkel; Peter D Asnis; Rob G H H Nelissen; Robert F LaPrade; Bertram Zarins; Guoan Li Journal: J Bone Joint Surg Am Date: 2017-07-05 Impact factor: 5.284