Literature DB >> 31773437

Should radiologists care about kV? Phantom and clinical study of effects of kV on hemoperitoneum HU in the setting of splenic injuries.

Dillon Hickman1, Jie Zhang2, Kristen McQuerry3, James Lee2.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Evaluate the potential effects of X-ray tube voltage (kV) changes on Hounsfield unit (HU) measurements of hemoperitoneum in patients with blunt splenic injuries.
METHODS: Eight different tissue equivalent electron density plugs in the Electron Density Phantom were scanned (muscle, adipose, breast, liver, lung (exhale), lung (inhale), trabecular bone, and dense bone). The phantom was scanned at different kV values (70, 80, 100, 120, and 140 kV). In the clinical study, the local trauma registry database was queried for splenic injuries between January 2015 and December 2016 with a final cohort of 110 patients. The average HU numbers of hemoperitoneum found in three different anatomic locations (pelvic, perisplenic, and perihepatic) were compared at different kV values (100 kV, 120 kV, and 140 kV). ANOVA and pairwise t tests were performed for statistical analysis.
RESULTS: In both studies, HU measurements generally decreased as kV increased, and vice versa. One hundred ten patients were reviewed: 29 for 100 kV, 66 for 120 kV, and 15 for 140 kV. For the perihepatic group, significant differences were observed in average HU in the following pairwise comparisons: 100/140 (13.7 (5.3), p < 0.05) and 120/140 (10.3 (4.5), p < 0.05). For the perisplenic group, significant differences were observed in 100/120 (7.0 (3.5), p < 0.05) and 100/140 (13.2 (4.9), p < 0.05). No significant difference was observed in the pelvic location (p = 0.5594).
CONCLUSIONS: HU measurements of hemoperitoneum in patients with blunt splenic injuries significantly varied with the use of different kV values. Radiologists should be aware of the possible effects of altering kV on HU.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Automated dose-optimized tube voltage selection; CARE kV; Computed tomography; Hemoperitoneum; Hounsfield unit; Tube voltage

Year:  2019        PMID: 31773437     DOI: 10.1007/s10140-019-01738-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Emerg Radiol        ISSN: 1070-3004


  12 in total

1.  Comparison of angular and combined automatic tube current modulation techniques with constant tube current CT of the abdomen and pelvis.

Authors:  Stefania Rizzo; Mannudeep Kalra; Bernhard Schmidt; Tejas Dalal; Christoph Suess; Thomas Flohr; Michael Blake; Sanjay Saini
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 3.959

2.  Do CT scans cause cancer?

Authors:  Carina Storrs
Journal:  Sci Am       Date:  2013-07       Impact factor: 2.142

3.  Radiation dose and image quality with abdominal computed tomography with automated dose-optimized tube voltage selection.

Authors:  Lirong Hu; Yujun Wang; Hongtao Hou; Fuquan Wei; Guangzhao Yang; Yougeng Chen
Journal:  J Int Med Res       Date:  2014-05-22       Impact factor: 1.671

Review 4.  Adrenal radiology: distinguishing benign from malignant adrenal masses.

Authors:  N R Dunnick; M Korobkin; I Francis
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  1996-10       Impact factor: 3.959

5.  Mandatory laparotomy for gunshot wounds penetrating the abdomen.

Authors:  E E Moore; J B Moore; S Van Duzer-Moore; J S Thompson
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  1980-12       Impact factor: 2.565

Review 6.  Fat-containing lesions of the chest.

Authors:  Scott C Gaerte; Cristopher A Meyer; Helen T Winer-Muram; Robert D Tarver; Dewey J Conces
Journal:  Radiographics       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 5.333

Review 7.  CT and MR imaging for evaluation of cystic renal lesions and diseases.

Authors:  Cecil G Wood; LeRoy J Stromberg; Carla B Harmath; Jeanne M Horowitz; Chun Feng; Nancy A Hammond; David D Casalino; Lori A Goodhartz; Frank H Miller; Paul Nikolaidis
Journal:  Radiographics       Date:  2015 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 5.333

8.  Hemoperitoneum studied by computed tomography.

Authors:  M P Federle; R B Jeffrey
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1983-07       Impact factor: 11.105

9.  Iterative reconstruction technique for reducing body radiation dose at CT: feasibility study.

Authors:  Amy K Hara; Robert G Paden; Alvin C Silva; Jennifer L Kujak; Holly J Lawder; William Pavlicek
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 3.959

10.  Limits of normality of quantitative thoracic CT analysis.

Authors:  Massimo Cressoni; Elisabetta Gallazzi; Chiara Chiurazzi; Antonella Marino; Matteo Brioni; Federica Menga; Irene Cigada; Martina Amini; Alessandro Lemos; Marco Lazzerini; Eleonora Carlesso; Paolo Cadringher; Davide Chiumello; Luciano Gattinoni
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2013-05-24       Impact factor: 9.097

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.