| Literature DB >> 31773215 |
Ang Li1, Qian Wu2, Greg Warnick3, Shan Li4, Edward N Libby2,5, David A Garcia6, Gary H Lyman2,3,5.
Abstract
It is uncertain if different immunomodulatory drugs (IMID) pose distinct thrombotic risk in patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (MM). Among 2397 MM patients from the SEER-Medicare database from 2007 to 2013, 78% received lenalidomide, and 22% received thalidomide. After inverse probability weighting to balance confounders, the 12-month incidences of venous thromboembolism (VTE 10%) and arterial thromboembolism (ATE 5%) were similarly high in both groups. Lenalidomide versus thalidomide had a subdistribution hazard ratio of 1.11 (0.59-2.02) for VTE and a subdistribution hazard ratio of 0.96 (0.45-1.98) for ATE. Overall survival was not significantly different with a hazard ratio of 0.88 (0.60-1.18) for lenalidomide versus thalidomide. Concurrent anticoagulant prophylaxis was infrequently prescribed in < 20% of both groups. Our study demonstrates that despite improvement in myeloma-directed therapy and supportive care, thrombosis remains an important consideration for all IMID-treated MM patients. Appropriate risk stratification and vigilant thromboprophylaxis remain essential to prevent this complication.Entities:
Keywords: Arterial thrombosis; Multiple myeloma; Thromboembolism; Venous thrombosis
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31773215 DOI: 10.1007/s00277-019-03860-2
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Ann Hematol ISSN: 0939-5555 Impact factor: 3.673