Literature DB >> 31772971

Quantifying Proton Fields for Midline Brain Tumors: A Benefit/Cost Analysis of Planning Objectives.

Neil C Estabrook1, Ted A Hoene2, Paul S Carlin3, Mark W McDonald4.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: We sought to quantify the optimum number of beams by using a midline sagittal arrangement for midline brain tumors when considering the competing demands of a high degree of target conformation and maximizing reduction of nontarget brain dose. The volume of nontarget brain tissue receiving between 5 and 20 Gy (V5-V20) was selected to measure "low-dose bath" to normal brain.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: An exploratory model was developed with 6 midline brain targets created by using spheres of 1-, 3-, and 5-cm diameters located in superficial and deep locations. For each, five 3-dimensional proton treatment plans with uniform beam scanning were generated by using 1 to 5 fields. Dose-volume histograms were analyzed to calculate conformation number and V5-V20. A benefit/cost analysis was performed to determine the marginal gain in conformation number and the marginal cost of V5-V20 for the addition of each field and hypothesize the optimum number of treatment fields. We tested our hypothesis by re-planning 10 actual patient tumors with the same technique to compare the averages of these 50 plans to our model.
RESULTS: Our model and validation cohort demonstrated the largest marginal benefit in target conformation and the lowest marginal cost in normal brain V5-V20 with the addition of a second proton field. The addition of a third field resulted in a relative marginal benefit in target conformation of just 3.9% but a relative marginal cost in V5-V20 of 78.7%. Normal brain absolute V5-V20 increased in a nearly linear fashion with each additional field.
CONCLUSIONS: When treating midline brain lesions with 3-dimensional proton therapy in an array of midline sagittal beams, our model suggests the most appropriate number of fields is 2. There was little marginal benefit in target conformation and increasing cost of normal brain dose when increasing the number of fields beyond this. © Copyright 2016 International Journal of Particle Therapy.

Entities:  

Keywords:  brain; central nervous system; dosimetry; protons

Year:  2016        PMID: 31772971      PMCID: PMC6871579          DOI: 10.14338/IJPT-15-00039.1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Part Ther        ISSN: 2331-5180


  23 in total

1.  Long-term impairment of subependymal repopulation following damage by ionizing irradiation.

Authors:  E Tada; C Yang; G T Gobbel; K R Lamborn; J R Fike
Journal:  Exp Neurol       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 5.330

Review 2.  Radiotherapy-induced hypopituitarism: a review.

Authors:  Thozhukat Sathyapalan; Sanjay Dixit
Journal:  Expert Rev Anticancer Ther       Date:  2012-05       Impact factor: 4.512

Review 3.  Conformity index: a review.

Authors:  Loïc Feuvret; Georges Noël; Jean-Jacques Mazeron; Pierre Bey
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2006-02-01       Impact factor: 7.038

Review 4.  Particle radiation therapy using proton and heavier ion beams.

Authors:  Daniela Schulz-Ertner; Hirohiko Tsujii
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2007-03-10       Impact factor: 44.544

5.  Preface.

Authors: 
Journal:  J ICRU       Date:  2010-04

6.  Preservation of memory with conformal avoidance of the hippocampal neural stem-cell compartment during whole-brain radiotherapy for brain metastases (RTOG 0933): a phase II multi-institutional trial.

Authors:  Vinai Gondi; Stephanie L Pugh; Wolfgang A Tome; Chip Caine; Ben Corn; Andrew Kanner; Howard Rowley; Vijayananda Kundapur; Albert DeNittis; Jeffrey N Greenspoon; Andre A Konski; Glenn S Bauman; Sunjay Shah; Wenyin Shi; Merideth Wendland; Lisa Kachnic; Minesh P Mehta
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2014-10-27       Impact factor: 44.544

7.  Fractionated proton beam irradiation of pituitary adenomas.

Authors:  Brian B Ronson; Reinhard W Schulte; Khanh P Han; Lilia N Loredo; James M Slater; Jerry D Slater
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2005-10-27       Impact factor: 7.038

8.  Effect of therapeutic ionizing radiation on the human brain.

Authors:  R G Steen; D Spence; S Wu; X Xiong; L E Kun; T E Merchant
Journal:  Ann Neurol       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 10.422

9.  Extreme sensitivity of adult neurogenesis to low doses of X-irradiation.

Authors:  Shinichiro Mizumatsu; Michelle L Monje; Duncan R Morhardt; Radoslaw Rola; Theo D Palmer; John R Fike
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2003-07-15       Impact factor: 12.701

10.  Neuroanatomical target theory as a predictive model for radiation-induced cognitive decline.

Authors:  Ann M Peiffer; C Marc Leyrer; Dana M Greene-Schloesser; Elaine Shing; William T Kearns; William H Hinson; Stephen B Tatter; Edward H Ip; Stephen R Rapp; Mike E Robbins; Edward G Shaw; Michael D Chan
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  2013-02-06       Impact factor: 9.910

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.