Literature DB >> 3177178

The clinical and pathophysiologic implications of pain, ST abnormalities, and scintigraphic changes induced during dipyridamole infusion: their relationships to the peripheral hemodynamic response.

Y Y Zhu1, W Lee, E Botvinick, M Dae, K Chatterjee, J Danforth, T Ports.   

Abstract

In order to determine their significance during dipyridamole perfusion scintigraphy, symptomatic, ECG, and scintigraphic findings were related to each other, to the hemodynamic response, and to angiographic findings in 73 consecutive patients having coronary angiography within 3 months of scintigraphy. The group having induced "cardiac" pain differed from the group without induced pain only in their higher incidence of induced ischemic ST changes, the "marked" hemodynamic response, and their lower incidence of an "absent" hemodynamic response (all p less than 0.01). Induced ST depression was found only in patients with coronary disease. In this population, dipyridamole-induced pain was a moderately specific marker and induced ST abnormalities a more highly specific marker for coronary disease. However, both were insensitive for coronary disease diagnosis. If induced pain or ST abnormalities in the presence of significant coronary disease were accepted as indicators of ischemia, then scintigraphic abnormalities appeared to be produced by dipyridamole in roughly equal incidence by ischemic and nonischemic mechanisms. Induced ischemia related frequently to an exaggerated hypotensive response with no change in double product, suggesting its cause to be an induced increase in myocardial oxygen demand. Dipyridamole-induced image defects were noted even in the absence of a peripheral hemodynamic response. This indicates that the peripheral response does not always correlate with its central coronary effect and an absent peripheral hemodynamic response does not necessarily invalidate scintigraphic results.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1988        PMID: 3177178     DOI: 10.1016/0002-8703(88)90162-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am Heart J        ISSN: 0002-8703            Impact factor:   4.749


  5 in total

1.  QRS score versus ST-segment changes in patients undergoing Tl-201 scintigraphy using dipyridamole infusion.

Authors:  Andreas P Michaelides; Christos A Fourlas; George K Andrikopoulos; Polychronis E Dilaveris; Andreas V Paspaliaris; Christodoulos I Stefanadis
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2005 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 5.952

2.  Dipyridamole magnetic resonance imaging: a comparison with thallium-201 emission tomography.

Authors:  D J Pennell; S R Underwood; P J Ell; R H Swanton; J M Walker; D B Longmore
Journal:  Br Heart J       Date:  1990-12

3.  Safety of dipyridamole testing in 73,806 patients: the Multicenter Dipyridamole Safety Study.

Authors:  J Lette; J L Tatum; S Fraser; D D Miller; D D Waters; G Heller; E B Stanton; H S Bom; J Leppo; S Nattel
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  1995 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 5.952

4.  Tachycardic vs. pharmacologic stress myocardial perfusion imaging: differential implications in multi-vessel ischemia.

Authors:  Thanh H Nguyen; John D Horowitz; Steven A Unger
Journal:  Am J Cardiovasc Dis       Date:  2011-12-15

Review 5.  Pharmacologic radionuclide myocardial perfusion imaging.

Authors:  Sachin M Navare; Athanasios Kapetanopoulos; Gary V Heller
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 2.931

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.