Literature DB >> 31770767

Optimal Starting Age and Baseline Level for Repeat Tests: Economic Concerns of PSA Screening for Chinese Men - 10-Year Experience of a Single Center.

Yang Liu1, Gang Xiao2, Jia-Wei Zhou1, Jian-Kun Yang1, Li Lu3, Jun Bian1, Lin Zhong4, Qing-Zhu Wei4, Qi-Zhao Zhou1, Kang-Yi Xue1, Wen-Bing Guo1, Ming Xia1, Jun-Hao Zhou1, Ji-Ming Bao1, Cheng Yang1, Cun-Dong Liu1, Ming-Kun Chen5.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the optimal age for the baseline serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA) test and for repeat screening and its economic burden in a single center in China.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: 35,533 men with PSA screening were retrospectively enrolled in this study. Follow-ups were conducted in 1,586 men with PSA >4 ng/mL, and receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) curves were employed to investigate the optimal cutoffs.
RESULTS: ROC analysis indicated that the optimal age for initial PSA screening was 57.5 years (AUC = 0.84), 62.5 years (AUC = 0.902), 60.5 years (AUC = 0.909), and 61.5 years (AUC = 0.890) for individuals with PSA >4 and >10 ng/mL, a diagnosis of prostate cancer (PCa), and clinically significant PCa defined as the focus events, respectively. For Chinese men aged 50-59, 60-69, and >70 years, the initial PSA levels of 1.305 ng/mL (AUC = 0.699), 1.975 ng/mL (AUC = 0.711), and 2.740 ng/mL (AUC = 0.720) might have a PSA velocity >0.75 ng/mL per year during the follow-up. In addition, the total cost amounts to CNY 13,609,260 in these cases, but only 60 of the 35,533 (0.17%) men gained benefit from PSA screening.
CONCLUSION: In our opinion, the optimal starting age for initial PSA testing was 57.5 years. The necessity for repeat screening should be based on the first PSA level depending on age. A cost--benefit analysis should be included in population-based screening.
© 2019 S. Karger AG, Basel.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Chinese men; Cost analysis; Optimal age; PSA screening; Screening intensity

Year:  2019        PMID: 31770767     DOI: 10.1159/000503733

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Urol Int        ISSN: 0042-1138            Impact factor:   2.089


  5 in total

1.  [Movember health care initiative 2019: prostate cancer screening at the University Hospital Frankfurt].

Authors:  M Wenzel; C Humke; S Wicker; J Mani; T Engl; G Hintereder; T J Vogl; P Wild; J Köllermann; C Rödel; S Asgharie; L Theissen; M Welte; L A Kluth; P Mandel; F K H Chun; F Preisser; A Becker
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2020-10       Impact factor: 0.639

2.  Association of Total Dietary Intake of Sugars with Prostate-Specific Antigen (PSA) Concentrations: Evidence from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES), 2003-2010.

Authors:  Zhangcheng Liu; Chi Chen; Fuxun Yu; Dongbo Yuan; Wei Wang; Ke Jiao; Shengbang Yang; Yongqiang Zhang; Yong Wang; Linhai Liu; Huali Xu; Yang Zhang; Guohua Zhu; Bin Hu; Jianguo Zhu
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2021-01-09       Impact factor: 3.411

3.  Real-world data in elderly men from Yokosuka City 15 years after introducing prostate-specific antigen-based population screening.

Authors:  Takuma Nirei; Tadashi Tabei; Naoki Sakai; Hideshige Koh; Minoru Yoshida; Atsushi Fujikawa; Hiroki Ito; Sohgo Tsutsumi; Souichi Furuhata; Sumio Noguchi; Masataka Taguri; Kazuki Kobayashi
Journal:  Mol Clin Oncol       Date:  2021-12-20

4.  Incidental Prostate Cancer from Prostate with Benign Biopsies: A Predictive and Survival Analysis from Cohort Study.

Authors:  Che Hsueh Yang; Yi Sheng Lin; Wei Chun Weng; Chao Yu Hsu; Min Che Tung; Yen Chuan Ou
Journal:  Int J Gen Med       Date:  2022-03-10

5.  Association between Serum Triglycerides and Prostate Specific Antigen (PSA) among U.S. Males: National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES), 2003-2010.

Authors:  Chengcheng Wei; Liang Tian; Bo Jia; Miao Wang; Ming Xiong; Bo Hu; Changqi Deng; Yaxin Hou; Teng Hou; Xiong Yang; Zhaohui Chen
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2022-03-22       Impact factor: 5.717

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.