Literature DB >> 31768678

Clinical impact of the CONUT score in patients with multiple myeloma.

Sho Okamoto1,2, Hiroshi Ureshino3,4, Keisuke Kidoguchi1, Kana Kusaba1, Haruna Kizuka-Sano1, Haruhiko Sano1, Atsujiro Nishioka1, Kyosuke Yamaguchi1, Kazuharu Kamachi1, Hidekazu Itamura1, Mariko Yoshimura1, Masako Yokoo1, Takero Shindo1,5, Yasushi Kubota1, Toshihiko Ando1, Kensuke Kojima1, Atsushi Kawaguchi6, Eisaburo Sueoka7,8, Shinya Kimura1,9.   

Abstract

Novel anti-myeloma drugs have significantly improved the overall survival (OS) of patients with multiple myeloma (MM). However, not all MM patients treated with these drugs show survival benefits, and biologic and genetic prognostic factors are insufficient to predict the response to treatment. Decreasing treatment-related complications is important to improve the efficacy of treatment in patients with MM. The Controlling Nutritional Status (CONUT) score is a screening method for poor nutritional status, which is associated with poor prognosis in several cancers because it increases the rate of treatment-related complications. We retrospectively analyzed the OS of 64 patients with symptomatic MM and evaluated the correlation between the CONUT score and patient prognosis in MM. The median age at diagnosis was 66 years, and multivariate analysis showed that a high CONUT score (≥ 5; hazard ratio, 3.937; 95% confidence interval, 1.214-12.658; P = 0.022) was an independent prognostic risk factor. Subgroup analysis was performed according to patient age because the choice of treatment strategy, particularly autologous peripheral blood stem cell transplantation (auto-PBSCT), can vary depending on age in MM patients. Younger patients (< 65 years old) who received auto-PBSCT and had a lower CONUT score (0-3) showed a significantly better survival outcome than those with a higher CONUT score (≥ 4) (median OS, not reached vs. 64.1 months; P = 0.011). The CONUT score is simple to calculate and provides a useful prognostic indicator in patients with MM, especially transplant-eligible patients.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Controlling nutritional status score; Multiple myeloma; Prognostic values; Transplant-eligible patients with multiple myeloma

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31768678     DOI: 10.1007/s00277-019-03844-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Hematol        ISSN: 0939-5555            Impact factor:   3.673


  6 in total

1.  CONUT Score: A New Tool for Predicting Prognosis in Patients with Advanced Thyroid Cancer Treated with TKI.

Authors:  Cristina Dalmiglio; Lucia Brilli; Michele Campanile; Cristina Ciuoli; Alessandra Cartocci; Maria Grazia Castagna
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2022-01-30       Impact factor: 6.639

2.  Prognostic value of the controlling nutritional status score in patients with myelodysplastic syndromes.

Authors:  Qiuni Chen; Kankan Chen; Sumei Wang; Lijuan Zhang; Yuye Shi; Shandong Tao; Zhengmei He; Chunling Wang; Liang Yu
Journal:  Front Nutr       Date:  2022-07-27

Review 3.  Host-related factors and cancer: Malnutrition and non-Hodgkin lymphoma.

Authors:  Salvatrice Mancuso; Marta Mattana; Marco Santoro; Melania Carlisi; Silvio Buscemi; Sergio Siragusa
Journal:  Hematol Oncol       Date:  2022-04-18       Impact factor: 4.850

4.  Immunonutritive Scoring in Patients With Hepatocellular Carcinoma Undergoing Transarterial Chemoembolization: Prognostic Nutritional Index or Controlling Nutritional Status Score?

Authors:  Lukas Müller; Felix Hahn; Aline Mähringer-Kunz; Fabian Stoehr; Simon J Gairing; Friedrich Foerster; Arndt Weinmann; Peter R Galle; Jens Mittler; Daniel Pinto Dos Santos; Michael B Pitton; Christoph Düber; Roman Kloeckner
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2021-06-10       Impact factor: 6.244

5.  A novel nutritional index "simplified CONUT" and the disease risk index independently stratify prognosis of elderly patients with acute myeloid leukemia.

Authors:  Hajime Senjo; Masahiro Onozawa; Daisuke Hidaka; Shota Yokoyama; Satoshi Yamamoto; Yutaka Tsutsumi; Yoshihito Haseyama; Takahiro Nagashima; Akio Mori; Shuichi Ota; Hajime Sakai; Toshimichi Ishihara; Takuto Miyagishima; Yasutaka Kakinoki; Mitsutoshi Kurosawa; Hajime Kobayashi; Hiroshi Iwasaki; Daigo Hashimoto; Takeshi Kondo; Takanori Teshima
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-11-10       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  Is CONUT score a prognostic index in patients with diffuse large cell lymphoma?

Authors:  Gülsüm Akgün Çağlıyan; Sibel Hacıoğlu; Başak Ünver Koluman; Kadir İlkkılıç; Rukiye Nar; Mehmet Nuri Başer; Aslı Bozdemir; Hande Şenol; Nilay Şen Türk; Veysel Erol; Onurcan Yılıdırım; Ömer Çağlıyan; Nil Güler
Journal:  Turk J Med Sci       Date:  2021-08-30       Impact factor: 0.973

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.