Literature DB >> 31768463

A Case of Vertebral Fracture Associated with Diffuse Idiopathic Skeletal Hyperostosis Treated by a Successful Conservative Treatment.

Kazuo Saita1, Yoshiro Monobe1, Satoshi Ogihara1, Yosuke Kobayashi1, Kei Sato1, Keiji Nishimura1, Masayuki Tanabe1.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Keywords:  conservative treatment; diffuse idiopathic skeletal hyperostosis; vertebral fracture

Year:  2018        PMID: 31768463      PMCID: PMC6834464          DOI: 10.22603/ssrr.2018-0071

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine Surg Relat Res        ISSN: 2432-261X


× No keyword cloud information.
We present a case of vertebral fracture associated with diffuse idiopathic skeletal hyperostosis (DISH) treated by a successful conservative treatment. DISH-associated vertebral fracture is unstable like a long bone fracture and often leads to severe paralysis after displacement. Early surgical stabilization is recommended[1],[2]); however, 26.6% postoperative complications[2]), neurological deterioration[3]), and perioperative deaths[2-6]) have been reported. Conservative treatment is selected in patients with surgical risk factors or delayed diagnosis[2]). However, detailed reports on conservative cases are lacking. A 63-year-old man experienced back pain after a fall. He had hypertension, diabetes, and hemodialysis for 3 years and had undergone coronary stent graft for angina pectoralis 1 year before. One month after the fall, he visited a clinic and was diagnosed with vertebral fracture, and posterior fusion surgery was recommended. However, he rejected surgery because he had not received any treatment for 1 month and experienced only slight back pain. Then, he visited our hospital. He could walk without aid or external fixation and showed no neurological deficit. Computed tomography (CT) 1 month after the fall revealed continuous ossification of the anterior longitudinal ligament (OALL) from T2 to L2, and it was broken at T7/T8 (Fig. 1-ab). On the right side, the fracture line ran through the T8 vertebral body horizontally via the T8 pedicle to the posterior wall of the lamina (Fig. 1-a). The T6-T8 spinous processes were fractured vertically (Fig. 1-b). In the spinal canal, the yellow ligament ossified in the mid-posterior portion.
Figure 1.

Computed tomography on first visit 1 month after the fall. a) Right side, b) midline.

Computed tomography on first visit 1 month after the fall. a) Right side, b) midline. It was diagnosed as DISH, not ankylosing spondylitis, as there was no history of low back pain and no inflammation finding in the blood examination and there was a large lumbar osteophyte. As there was no neurological deficit, he refused surgical treatment. Furthermore, he had many comorbidities; therefore, he was treated conservatively with thoracolumbar orthosis made with plastic and metal frame covering the chest to the iliac crest while performing standing activities about 4 to 12 hours per day. He came to our clinic every month for 5 months and after once for every 2 months, and CT evaluation was performed at 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 11, 15 months after the injury, and plain X-ray was performed at 4, 9 months. Two months after the injury, back pain was reduced and he could recline on a tilted chairback. CT showed no fracture displacement. Three months after the injury, back pain while lying down resolved. Ventral callus formation ahead of OALL at T7/T8, sclerotic change in the T8 vertebral body, and callus formation around the spinous process were observed (Fig. 2-a). After 5 months, he experienced back pain only when lying on a hard floor. Ventral callus formation ahead of OALL had developed, and the fracture line in the posterior T8 vertebral body became unclear. Seven months after the injury, ventral callus formation ahead of OALL developed into a large mass (Fig. 2-b). Subsequently, back pain completely resolved, and the ventral callus was linked between T7 and T8 after 9 months. Ventral callus matured, anterior cortex united firmly, and fracture ossification of the supraspinous process ligament united after 11 months; therefore, the thoracolumbar orthosis was removed. Fifteen-month CT revealed adequate unification of the vertebral body and spinous process (Fig. 2-c).
Figure 2.

Computed tomography after the fall. a) 3 months, b) 7 months, c) 15 months.

OALL, ossification of the anterior longitudinal ligament

Computed tomography after the fall. a) 3 months, b) 7 months, c) 15 months. OALL, ossification of the anterior longitudinal ligament We hesitated to select conservative treatment owing to insufficient information. Efficacy of conservative teriparatide treatment for lumbar fracture in DISH was reported[7]); however, teriparatide was not suitable for our patient because of secondary hyperparathyroidism due to hemodialysis. The fracture in our case was relatively stable because the fracture lines were complicated three-dimensionally and T7-T8 was in a relatively stable level owing to the rib cage. This stability is the key to successful conservative treatment. Patients with delayed diagnosis over 1 month of DISH-associated vertebral fracture may be treated conservatively, especially those with many surgical risks. The detail of this report will be informative for the selection of conservative treatment.

Conflicts of Interest: The authors declare that there are no relevant conflicts of interest. Author Contributions: K Saita wrote and prepared the manuscript, and all of the authors participated in the study design. All authors have read, reviewed, and approved the article.
  7 in total

1.  Diffuse idiopathic skeletal hyperostosis in the cervical spine.

Authors:  P R Meyer
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 4.176

2.  Effective treatment of delayed union of a lumbar vertebral fracture with daily administration of teriparatide in a patient with diffuse idiopathic skeletal hyperostosis.

Authors:  Takuji Matsumoto; Muneharu Ando; Shunji Sasaki
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2015-02-04       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  Spine fractures in patients with ankylosing spinal disorders.

Authors:  Troy Caron; Richard Bransford; Quynh Nguyen; Julie Agel; Jens Chapman; Carlo Bellabarba
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2010-05-15       Impact factor: 3.468

Review 4.  Fractures of the spine in diffuse idiopathic skeletal hyperostosis.

Authors:  D Paley; M Schwartz; P Cooper; W R Harris; A M Levine
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1991-06       Impact factor: 4.176

5.  In-hospital neurologic deterioration following fractures of the ankylosed spine: a single-institution experience.

Authors:  Terry K Schiefer; Brian D Milligan; Colten D Bracken; Jeffrey T Jacob; William E Krauss; Mark A Pichelmann; Michelle J Clarke
Journal:  World Neurosurg       Date:  2014-12-26       Impact factor: 2.104

6.  The management of spinal injuries in patients with ankylosing spondylitis or diffuse idiopathic skeletal hyperostosis: a comparison of treatment methods and clinical outcomes.

Authors:  Peter G Whang; Grigory Goldberg; James P Lawrence; Joseph Hong; James S Harrop; David Greg Anderson; Todd J Albert; Alexander R Vaccaro
Journal:  J Spinal Disord Tech       Date:  2009-04

7.  CT-based morphological analysis of spinal fractures in patients with diffuse idiopathic skeletal hyperostosis.

Authors:  Eijiro Okada; Takashi Tsuji; Kentaro Shimizu; Masanori Kato; Kentaro Fukuda; Shinjiro Kaneko; Jun Ogawa; Kota Watanabe; Ken Ishii; Masaya Nakamura; Morio Matsumoto
Journal:  J Orthop Sci       Date:  2016-10-03       Impact factor: 1.601

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.