Hannah R Abrams1, Hayden S Leeds2,3, Heidi V Russell2,4, Melody B Hellsten2. 1. Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX. 2. Texas Children's Cancer and Hematology Centers, Department of Pediatrics, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston TX. 3. Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR. 4. Center for Medical Ethics and Health Policy, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX.
Abstract
PURPOSE: Caring for a child with cancer or hematologic disease places unique stress on a family unit. Families' subjective experience of this care-related burden mediates the relationship between cost and health-related outcomes. While financial costs are well described for families of pediatric hematology/oncology patients, it is unclear how cost and other factors each contribute to families' overall experience of care-related burden. This study identifies and groups the challenges that families report and describes their association with overall reported burden. METHODS: This mixed-methods analysis of a cross-sectional single-center study was conducted via structured, self-administered questionnaire provided to inpatient and outpatient caregivers of pediatric hematology/oncology patients. Respondents rated their perception of burden associated with that day's medical encounter on a 5-point Likert scale. The questionnaire included an open-ended prompt for caregivers about areas they deemed most burdensome. Primary themes were extracted and categorized. RESULTS: A total of 278 outpatient and 42 inpatient caregivers participated. Six thematic categories emerged: logistics, life disruption, care delivery system, parking, financial burden, and emotional burden. Outpatient caregivers reported more burden than inpatient caregivers for the first three categories, while inpatient caregivers reported more burden for the last three. Salient subthemes associated with higher and lower overall burden were identified in each theme category. CONCLUSIONS: These data establish theme categories for future study of caregiver-perceived burden in pediatric hematologic/oncologic encounters, demonstrate that certain components of cost contribute disproportionately to caregivers' overall sense of care-related burden, and identify areas within each of the 6 burden categories that can be best targeted to alleviate caregiver burden.
PURPOSE: Caring for a child with cancer or hematologic disease places unique stress on a family unit. Families' subjective experience of this care-related burden mediates the relationship between cost and health-related outcomes. While financial costs are well described for families of pediatric hematology/oncology patients, it is unclear how cost and other factors each contribute to families' overall experience of care-related burden. This study identifies and groups the challenges that families report and describes their association with overall reported burden. METHODS: This mixed-methods analysis of a cross-sectional single-center study was conducted via structured, self-administered questionnaire provided to inpatient and outpatient caregivers of pediatric hematology/oncology patients. Respondents rated their perception of burden associated with that day's medical encounter on a 5-point Likert scale. The questionnaire included an open-ended prompt for caregivers about areas they deemed most burdensome. Primary themes were extracted and categorized. RESULTS: A total of 278 outpatient and 42 inpatient caregivers participated. Six thematic categories emerged: logistics, life disruption, care delivery system, parking, financial burden, and emotional burden. Outpatient caregivers reported more burden than inpatient caregivers for the first three categories, while inpatient caregivers reported more burden for the last three. Salient subthemes associated with higher and lower overall burden were identified in each theme category. CONCLUSIONS: These data establish theme categories for future study of caregiver-perceived burden in pediatric hematologic/oncologic encounters, demonstrate that certain components of cost contribute disproportionately to caregivers' overall sense of care-related burden, and identify areas within each of the 6 burden categories that can be best targeted to alleviate caregiver burden.
Authors: Maria I Lapid; Pamela J Atherton; Simon Kung; Jeff A Sloan; Varun Shahi; Matthew M Clark; Teresa A Rummans Journal: Psychooncology Date: 2015-09-11 Impact factor: 3.894
Authors: Jay G Berry; Matt Hall; David E Hall; Dennis Z Kuo; Eyal Cohen; Rishi Agrawal; Kenneth D Mandl; Holly Clifton; John Neff Journal: JAMA Pediatr Date: 2013-02 Impact factor: 16.193
Authors: Scott D Ramsey; Aasthaa Bansal; Catherine R Fedorenko; David K Blough; Karen A Overstreet; Veena Shankaran; Polly Newcomb Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2016-01-25 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Jonas A de Souza; Bonnie J Yap; Kristen Wroblewski; Victoria Blinder; Fabiana S Araújo; Fay J Hlubocky; Lauren H Nicholas; Jeremy M O'Connor; Bruce Brockstein; Mark J Ratain; Christopher K Daugherty; David Cella Journal: Cancer Date: 2016-10-07 Impact factor: 6.860