Literature DB >> 31767762

Technoeconomic and life-cycle analysis of single-step catalytic conversion of wet ethanol into fungible fuel blendstocks.

John R Hannon1, Lee R Lynd2,3, Onofre Andrade4, Pahola Thathiana Benavides5, Gregg T Beckham6,7, Mary J Biddy6,7, Nathan Brown8, Mateus F Chagas9, Brian H Davison6,10, Thomas Foust7, Tassia L Junqueira9, Mark S Laser3, Zhenglong Li10, Tom Richard11, Ling Tao7, Gerald A Tuskan6,10, Michael Wang5, Jeremy Woods12, Charles E Wyman1,6,13.   

Abstract

Technoeconomic and life-cycle analyses are presented for catalytic conversion of ethanol to fungible hydrocarbon fuel blendstocks, informed by advances in catalyst and process development. Whereas prior work toward this end focused on 3-step processes featuring dehydration, oligomerization, and hydrogenation, the consolidated alcohol dehydration and oligomerization (CADO) approach described here results in 1-step conversion of wet ethanol vapor (40 wt% in water) to hydrocarbons and water over a metal-modified zeolite catalyst. A development project increased liquid hydrocarbon yields from 36% of theoretical to >80%, reduced catalyst cost by an order of magnitude, scaled up the process by 300-fold, and reduced projected costs of ethanol conversion 12-fold. Current CADO products conform most closely to gasoline blendstocks, but can be blended with jet fuel at low levels today, and could potentially be blended at higher levels in the future. Operating plus annualized capital costs for conversion of wet ethanol to fungible blendstocks are estimated at $2.00/GJ for CADO today and $1.44/GJ in the future, similar to the unit energy cost of producing anhydrous ethanol from wet ethanol ($1.46/GJ). Including the cost of ethanol from either corn or future cellulosic biomass but not production incentives, projected minimum selling prices for fungible blendstocks produced via CADO are competitive with conventional jet fuel when oil is $100 per barrel but not at $60 per barrel. However, with existing production incentives, the projected minimum blendstock selling price is competitive with oil at $60 per barrel. Life-cycle greenhouse gas emission reductions for CADO-derived hydrocarbon blendstocks closely follow those for the ethanol feedstock.

Entities:  

Keywords:  ethanol; heterogeneous catalysis; low-carbon fungible fuel blendstocks

Year:  2019        PMID: 31767762      PMCID: PMC7293641          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1821684116

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  4 in total

Review 1.  Cellulosic ethanol: status and innovation.

Authors:  Lee R Lynd; Xiaoyu Liang; Mary J Biddy; Andrew Allee; Hao Cai; Thomas Foust; Michael E Himmel; Mark S Laser; Michael Wang; Charles E Wyman
Journal:  Curr Opin Biotechnol       Date:  2017-05-18       Impact factor: 9.740

2.  Techno-economic comparison of biojet fuel production from lignocellulose, vegetable oil and sugar cane juice.

Authors:  Gabriel Wilhelm Diederichs; Mohsen Ali Mandegari; Somayeh Farzad; Johann F Görgens
Journal:  Bioresour Technol       Date:  2016-05-24       Impact factor: 9.642

3.  Heterobimetallic Zeolite, InV-ZSM-5, Enables Efficient Conversion of Biomass Derived Ethanol to Renewable Hydrocarbons.

Authors:  Chaitanya K Narula; Zhenglong Li; Erik M Casbeer; Robert A Geiger; Melanie Moses-Debusk; Martin Keller; Michelle V Buchanan; Brian H Davison
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2015-11-03       Impact factor: 4.379

4.  Natural climate solutions.

Authors:  Bronson W Griscom; Justin Adams; Peter W Ellis; Richard A Houghton; Guy Lomax; Daniela A Miteva; William H Schlesinger; David Shoch; Juha V Siikamäki; Pete Smith; Peter Woodbury; Chris Zganjar; Allen Blackman; João Campari; Richard T Conant; Christopher Delgado; Patricia Elias; Trisha Gopalakrishna; Marisa R Hamsik; Mario Herrero; Joseph Kiesecker; Emily Landis; Lars Laestadius; Sara M Leavitt; Susan Minnemeyer; Stephen Polasky; Peter Potapov; Francis E Putz; Jonathan Sanderman; Marcel Silvius; Eva Wollenberg; Joseph Fargione
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2017-10-16       Impact factor: 11.205

  4 in total
  3 in total

1.  A colloquium on the status and challenges in science for decarbonizing our energy landscape.

Authors:  Richard Eisenberg; Harry B Gray; George W Crabtree
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2020-05-18       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 2.  Microbial production of advanced biofuels.

Authors:  Jay Keasling; Hector Garcia Martin; Taek Soon Lee; Aindrila Mukhopadhyay; Steven W Singer; Eric Sundstrom
Journal:  Nat Rev Microbiol       Date:  2021-06-25       Impact factor: 60.633

3.  Toward net-zero sustainable aviation fuel with wet waste-derived volatile fatty acids.

Authors:  Nabila A Huq; Glenn R Hafenstine; Xiangchen Huo; Hannah Nguyen; Stephen M Tifft; Davis R Conklin; Daniela Stück; Jim Stunkel; Zhibin Yang; Joshua S Heyne; Matthew R Wiatrowski; Yimin Zhang; Ling Tao; Junqing Zhu; Charles S McEnally; Earl D Christensen; Cameron Hays; Kurt M Van Allsburg; Kinga A Unocic; Harry M Meyer; Zia Abdullah; Derek R Vardon
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2021-03-30       Impact factor: 11.205

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.