| Literature DB >> 31766993 |
Yang Li1, Yu Zhang1, Liansheng Ma2, Xiaoyuan Niu, Junsen Chang1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Stroke-associated pneumonia (SAP) is a common complication of cerebrovascular disease. The A2DS2 score has been used to predict the risk of SAP. However, hyperglycemia is not included in this scale. The purpose of the present study was to explore whether the A2DS2 scoring system and hyperglycemia could predict the risk of SAP more effectively than the conventional A2DS2 scale.Entities:
Keywords: A2DS2 score; Fasting hyperglycemia; Predictive value; Stroke-associated pneumonia
Mesh:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31766993 PMCID: PMC6876087 DOI: 10.1186/s12883-019-1497-x
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Neurol ISSN: 1471-2377 Impact factor: 2.474
Statistical analysis of clinical characteristics between two groups
| Variables | Non-SAP | SAP | χ2 | OR | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Elderly age (≥75 years old) | 396 (16.8%) | 87 (43.5%) | 85.402 | 3.803 | < 0.001 |
| Male sex | 1635 (69.5%) | 133 (66.5%) | 0.787 | 1.148 | 0.375 |
| Atrial fibrillation | 121 (5.1%) | 50 (25.0%) | 116.239 | 6.146 | < 0.001 |
| Dysphagia | 389 (16.5%) | 51 (25.5%) | 10.373 | 1.727 | 0.001 |
| NIHSS score (≥16 points)* | 12 (0.5%) | 33 (16.5%) | – | – | < 0.001 |
| NIHSS score (5–15 points)* | 742 (31.5%) | 114 (57.0%) | – | – | < 0.001 |
| NIHSS score (0–4 points)* | 1598 (67.9%) | 53 (26.5%) | – | – | < 0.001 |
| Random hyperglycemia | 257 (10.9%) | 35 (17.5%) | 7.860 | 1.729 | 0.005 |
| Fasting hyperglycemia | 566 (24.1%) | 95 (47.5%) | 52.747 | 2.855 | < 0.001 |
| Random or fasting hyperglycemia | 619 (26.3%) | 99 (49.5%) | 48.992 | 2.744 | < 0.001 |
| Posterior circulation infarction | 772 (32.8%) | 71 (35.5%) | 0.597 | 1.126 | 0.440 |
NIHSS, National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale
*NIHSS scores was compared using nonparametric tests
There was no significant difference in gender and infarction site between the SAP group and non-SAP group (P > 0.05). The incidence of SAP in patients with the following factor(s) was significantly higher than that in patients without the following factor(s) (P < 0.05): elderly age (≥75 years old), atrial fibrillation, dysphagia, random hyperglycemia, fasting hyperglycemia, or random or fasting hyperglycemia. Therefore, these factors were considered as potential risk factors for SAP. These patients were classified into three subgroups according to stroke severity (NIHSS score), and there was a statistically significant difference in the incidence of pneumonia among these three subgroups (P < 0.05)
Stepwise logistic regression analysis showing independent risk factors of stroke-associated pneumonia
| Risk factors | Adjusted OR | 95% confidence interval | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Elderly age (≥75 years old) | 3.94 | 2.77–5.62 | < 0.001 |
| Male sex | 1.61 | 1.12–2.33 | 0.011 |
| Atrial fibrillation | 3.33 | 2.11–5.25 | < 0.001 |
| Dysphagia | 1.74 | 1.19–2.54 | 0.004 |
| NIHSS score (5–15 points) | 3.95 | 2.77–5.62 | < 0.001 |
| NIHSS score (≥16 points) | 91.64 | 42.04–199.75 | < 0.001 |
| Fasting hyperglycemia | 2.95 | 2.11–4.12 | < 0.001 |
NIHSS, National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale
The logistic regression analysis results revealed that elderly age (≥75 years old), male gender, atrial fibrillation, dysphagia, an NIHSS score of 5–15 points, NIHSS of ≥16 points, and fasting hyperglycemia were independent risk factors of SAP (P < 0.05)
Modified A2DS2 score (combined conventional A2DS2 score and fasting hyperglycemia)
| Clinical characteristics on admission | Assigned points |
|---|---|
| Elderly age (≥75 years old) | + 1 |
| Male sex | + 1 |
| Atrial fibrillation | + 1 |
| Dysphagia | + 2 |
| Stroke severity | |
| NIHSS score (5–15 points) | + 3 |
| NIHSS score (≥16 points) | + 5 |
| Fasting hyperglycemia | + 2 |
NIHSS, National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale
The adjusted OR value of fasting hyperglycemia was 2.95, which was assigned with 2 points in the modified A2DS2 scoring system
Cut-off values and corresponding sensitivity and specificity
| Cut-off value | Modified A2DS2 score | Conventional A2DS2 score | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sensitivity (%) | Specificity (%) | Youden index | Sensitivity (%) | Specificity (%) | Youden index | |
| 1 | 100.0 | 8.5 | 0.085 | 99.5 | 12.5 | 0.12 |
| 2 | 94.0 | 39.4 | 0.334 | 90.5 | 51.7 | 0.422 |
| 3 | 90.0 | 50.4 | 0.404 | 83.5 | 60.8 | 0.443 |
| 4 | 80.5 | 67.9 | 0.484 | 69.0 | 72.9 | 0.419 |
| 5 | 67.5 | 81.9 | 0.494 | 50.0 | 88.5 | 0.385 |
| 6 | 51.0 | 88.3 | 0.393 | 31.5 | 93.1 | 0.246 |
| 7 | 29.0 | 95.9 | 0.249 | 12.0 | 98.9 | 0.109 |
| 8 | 14.5 | 98.0 | 0.125 | 3.0 | 99.9 | 0.029 |
| 9 | 6.5 | 99.8 | 0.063 | 0.5 | 100.0 | 0.005 |
| 10 | 1.5 | 100.0 | 0.015 | 0.0 | 100.0 | 0 |
When the cut-off value was 4 points, the sensitivity and the specificity were 80.5 and 67.9%, respectively
Fig. 1ROC curve analysis
Area under curve
| Scoring system | Area under curve | Standard Error | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Modified A2DS2 score | 0.814 | 0.0153 | 2.336 | 0.020 |
| Conventional A2DS2 score | 0.793 | 0.0155 |
The area under curve of the modified A2DS2 scoring system was significantly higher than that of the conventional A2DS2 scoring system