| Literature DB >> 31766587 |
Yi Tan1, Jia Li1, Linglei Zhang1, Min Chen1, Yaowen Zhang2, Ruidong An1.
Abstract
The effects of hydrodynamics on algae growth have received considerable attention, and flow velocity is one of the most frequently discussed factors. For Euglena gracilis, which aggregates resources and is highly resistant to environmental changes, the mechanism underlying the impact of flow velocity on its growth is poorly understood. Experiments were conducted to examine the response of algae growth to different velocities, and several enzymes were tested to determine their physiological mechanisms. Significant differences in the growth of E. gracilis were found at different flow velocities, and this phenomenon is unique compared to the growth of other algal species. With increasing flow velocity and time, the growth of E. gracilis is gradually inhibited. In particular, we found that the pioneer enzyme is peroxidase (POD) and that the main antioxidant enzyme is catalase (CAT) when E. gracilis experiences flow velocity stress. Hysteresis between total phosphorus (TP) consumption and alkaline phosphatase (AKP) synthesis was observed. Under experimental control conditions, the results indicate that flow velocities above 0.1 m/s may inhibit growth and that E. gracilis prefers a relatively slow or even static flow velocity, and this finding could be beneficial for the control of E. gracilis blooms.Entities:
Keywords: Euglena gracilis; algae growth; antioxidant enzyme; flow velocity; hydrodynamic condition; nutrient absorbance; optimum flow velocity; oxidation level; stress flow velocity
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31766587 PMCID: PMC6926883 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph16234641
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health ISSN: 1660-4601 Impact factor: 3.390
Figure 1View of the experimental apparatus.
Correlations between the algal biomass and Chla under different flow velocities for 24 days.
| Flow Velocity (m/s) | Chla |
|---|---|
| 0 | 0.904 * |
| 0.1 | 0.822 * |
| 0.2 | 0.894 * |
| 0.3 | 0.931 ** |
| 0.4 | 0.878 * |
| 0.5 | 0.902 * |
A p-value of 0.05 is considered significant; ** indicates p < 0.01, and * indicates p < 0.05.
Figure 2(a) Changes in the algal biomass under different flow velocities. (b) The specific growth rates of the algae biomass under different flow velocities. All values are the means of triplicate measurements ± SDs (n = 3).
Prediction formulas for algae growth under different flow velocities for 24 days.
| Flow Velocity (m/s) | Prediction Formula of Algal Growth | R2 |
|---|---|---|
| 0 | y = −0.0015x2 + 0.067x + 0.8971 | 0.9418 |
| 0.1 | y = −0.0025x2 + 0.0328x + 0.8614 | 0.9172 |
| 0.2 | y = 0.0004x2 – 0.0475x + 1.0554 | 0.8984 |
| 0.3 | y = 0.0007x2 – 0.055x + 1.0773 | 0.938 |
| 0.4 | y = 0.0008x2 – 0.0489x + 0.984 | 0.9238 |
| 0.5 | y = 0.0019x2 – 0.075x + 0.9193 | 0.9636 |
Figure 3Changes in (a) malondialdehyde (MDA), (b) superoxide dismutase (SOD), (c) catalase (CAT), and (d) peroxidase (POD) at different flow velocities. All values are the means of triplicate measurements ± SDs (n = 3).
Correlations between MDA and biomass and SOD at different flow velocities for 24 days.
| Flow Velocity (m/s) | Biomass | SOD |
|---|---|---|
| 0 | −0.720 | −0.020 |
| 0.1 | −0.877 ** | 0.333 |
| 0.2 | −0.985 ** | 0.645 |
| 0.3 | −0.962 ** | 0.817 * |
| 0.4 | −0.955 ** | 0.737 |
| 0.5 | −0.978 ** | 0.904 ** |
A p-value of 0.05 is considered significant; ** indicates p < 0.01, and * indicates p < 0.05.
Figure 4Changes in the (a) TN and (b) TP concentrations at different flow velocities. The specific consumption rates of (c) TN and (d) TP concentrations at different flow velocities. All values are the means of triplicate measurements ± SDs (n = 3).
The instantaneous consumption rates (Day 4) and steady-state consumption rates of TN and TP at different flow velocities.
| Flow Velocity (m/s) | Instantaneous Consumption Rate | Steady-state Consumption Rate | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TN | TP | TN | TP | |
| 0 | 64.00 | 1.45 | 17.72 | 0.12 |
| 0.1 | 51.46 | 1.80 | 15.11 | 0.10 |
| 0.2 | 59.00 | 1.72 | 15.08 | 0.07 |
| 0.3 | 53.63 | 1.65 | 14.80 | 0.06 |
| 0.4 | 59.41 | 1.42 | 13.54 | 0.03 |
| 0.5 | 50.53 | 1.76 | 13.87 | −0.12 |
Figure 5Changes in alkaline phosphatase (AKP) enzymes at different flow velocities. All values are the means of triplicate measurements ± SDs (n = 3).
Correlations between AKP and other indexes at different flow velocities for 24 days.
| Flow Velocity (m/s) | TP | Biomass | MDA | SOD |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 0.386 | −0.617 | 0.44 | 0.412 |
| 0.1 | 0.323 | −0.894 ** | 0.804 * | 0.670 |
| 0.2 | 0.393 | −0.966 ** | 0.976 ** | 0.772 * |
| 0.3 | 0.460 | −0.975 ** | 0.988 ** | 0.858 * |
| 0.4 | 0.510 | −0.970 ** | 0.922 ** | 0.896 ** |
| 0.5 | 0.394 | −0.969 ** | 0.945 ** | 0.826 * |
A p-value of 0.05 is considered significant; ** indicates p < 0.01, and * indicates p < 0.05.