| Literature DB >> 31766505 |
Tugba Gonca Isin Ozkan1, Emine Akalin Urusak2, Kwame Sarpong Appiah1, Yoshiharu Fujii1.
Abstract
Turkey has one of the richest plant diversities in the Mediterranean region. In the current literature, no broad screening has been conducted on the potential allelopathy of plants from Turkey. This study aimed to evaluate the allelopathic activity of a large number of plants from Turkey for the first time and to determine the species with significant plant growth inhibitory potentials by bioassay. Dried samples of different plant parts were collected from local herbalists. The sandwich method was used to evaluate the potential allelopathy of 126 medicinal plants belonging to 55 families. The results of lettuce radicle and hypocotyl growth for 10 and 50 mg sample treatment conformed to normal distribution. Significant inhibition on lettuce radicle elongation with 10 mg sample was observed in 40 species, out of which 27 species showed over 50% inhibitory activity. The results suggested that these species could contain potential inhibitory compounds against lettuce radicle or hypocotyl growth. The calyxes of Hibiscus sabdariffa (3.2% of control) and the seeds of Prunus dulcis (5.7% of control) showed the most potent growth inhibitory activity on lettuce radicle elongation. The potential plant growth inhibitory effects of these plants, together with the fruits of Rhus coriaria and seeds of Prunus mahaleb, have been reported in this study for the first time. All these plants are medicinal, and the results hereby presented provide essential information about the allelopathic effects of medicinal plants from Turkey.Entities:
Keywords: Turkey; allelopathy; growth inhibitory activity; plants; sandwich method
Year: 2019 PMID: 31766505 PMCID: PMC6963494 DOI: 10.3390/plants8120532
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Plants (Basel) ISSN: 2223-7747
The radicle and hypocotyl elongation percentages of lettuce seedlings grown on agar gel containing plant materials tested by sandwich method. Overview of top 30 most inhibitory plants.
| Species [Used Part *] | Radicle Elongation (% of Control) | Hypocotyl Elongation (% of Control) | Total Score of * | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 10 mg | Crit. | 50 mg | Crit. | 10 mg | Crit. | 50 mg | Crit. | ||
| 3.2 | ***** | 5.1 | ** | 6.6 | ***** | 3.3 | *** | 15 | |
| 5.7 | **** | 0.0 | *** | 6.7 | ***** | 0.0 | *** | 15 | |
| 7.1 | **** | 4.0 | ** | 45.5 | *** | 11.9 | *** | 12 | |
| 7.1 | **** | 5.7 | ** | 41.0 | *** | 13.0 | *** | 12 | |
| 7.4 | **** | 3.2 | ** | 33.1 | **** | 10.6 | *** | 13 | |
| 7.8 | **** | 3.1 | ** | 11.6 | ***** | 0.0 | *** | 14 | |
| 8.6 | **** | 4.2 | ** | 16.4 | ***** | 4.9 | *** | 14 | |
| 24.5 | *** | 8.3 | ** | 56.4 | ** | 45.3 | * | 8 | |
| 27.3 | *** | 16.4 | * | 57.3 | ** | 43.6 | * | 7 | |
| 27.4 | *** | 1.9 | ** | 81.5 | * | 0.5 | *** | 9 | |
| 27.7 | *** | 29.9 | 60.8 | ** | 91.0 | 5 | |||
| 27.8 | *** | 14.0 | ** | 15.1 | ***** | 11.7 | *** | 13 | |
| 31.4 | ** | 9.0 | ** | 92.7 | 50.0 | * | 5 | ||
| 32.9 | ** | 11.7 | ** | 66.6 | ** | 44.5 | * | 7 | |
| 36.0 | ** | 3.8 | ** | 40.7 | *** | 1.2 | *** | 10 | |
| 36.2 | ** | 13.5 | ** | 87.9 | 53.6 | * | 5 | ||
| 37.0 | ** | 15.4 | * | 83.8 | 63.9 | 3 | |||
| 37.5 | ** | 6.1 | ** | 46.8 | *** | 16.8 | *** | 10 | |
| 37.9 | ** | 28.8 | 56.3 | ** | 43.7 | * | 5 | ||
| 39.5 | ** | 18.6 | * | 104 | 91.9 | 3 | |||
| 40.7 | ** | 26.5 | * | 82.3 | * | 74.9 | 4 | ||
| 41.9 | ** | 28.8 | 128 | 102.3 | 2 | ||||
| 42.1 | ** | 26.5 | * | 63.5 | ** | 84.1 | 5 | ||
| 42.3 | ** | 23.0 | * | 109 | 93.6 | 3 | |||
| 44.5 | * | 18.9 | * | 85.9 | 70.5 | 2 | |||
| 44.5 | * | 44.4 | 83.9 | 90.1 | 1 | ||||
| 49.8 | * | 24.7 | * | 65.2 | ** | 41.5 | * | 5 | |
| 50.2 | * | 29.7 | 98.3 | 78.3 | 1 | ||||
| 50.3 | * | 6.5 | ** | 75.0 | * | 24.7 | ** | 6 | |
| 52.1 | * | 37.3 | 102 | 86.3 | 1 | ||||
| Mean, M | 69.5 | 42.3 | 99.6 | ||||||
| Standard Deviation, SD | 26.0 | 27.9 | 32.8 | ||||||
| M−0.5 × SD | 56.5 | * | 28.4 | * | 83.2 | * | 57.8 | * | |
| M−1.0 × SD | 43.5 | ** | 14.5 | ** | 66.8 | ** | 38.0 | ** | |
| M−1.5 × SD | 30.5 | *** | 0.6 | *** | 50.4 | *** | 18.2 | *** | |
| M−2.0 × SD | 17.5 | **** | 34.0 | **** | |||||
| M−2.5 × SD | 4.5 | ***** | 17.6 | ***** | |||||
* Abbreviations: B = Bark, C = Calyx, Fl = Flower, Fr = Fruit, G = Gum, L = Leaf, P = Peel, R = Root, S = Seed.
Taxonomic diversity of the evaluated species collected from Turkey.
| Plant Family | Number of Species | Percent (%) of Species | Number of Samples | Percent (%) of Samples |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lamiaceae | 15 | 11.9 | 15 | 10.4 |
| Asteraceae | 14 | 11.1 | 14 | 9.7 |
| Rosaceae | 11 | 8.7 | 13 | 9.0 |
| Apiaceae | 9 | 7.1 | 11 | 7.6 |
| Brassicaceae | 5 | 4.0 | 5 | 3.5 |
| Fabaceae | 5 | 4.0 | 6 | 4.2 |
| Malvaceae | 5 | 4.0 | 5 | 3.5 |
| Cupressaceae | 3 | 2.4 | 3 | 2.1 |
| Papaveraceae | 3 | 2.4 | 3 | 2.1 |
| Poaceae | 3 | 2.4 | 5 | 3.5 |
| Other 45 * | 53 | 29.4 | 64 | 44.4 |
| Total | 126 | 100 | 144 | 100 |
Other * means plant families with one or two species.
Figure 1Effect of 10 mg screened samples on lettuce growth with the number of involved species; (a) Radicle elongation, (b) Hypocotyl elongation.
Figure 2Effect of 50 mg screened samples on lettuce growth with the number of involved species; (a) Radicle elongation, (b) Hypocotyl elongation.
Figure 3Diversity in plant parts of the evaluated species.
Figure 4Cultivation status of the medicinal plants evaluated in this study.
Comparison of results of this study to previous reports.
| References | Sample Number | M | SD | Country |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| [ | 239 | 68.3 | 25.7 | Japan |
| [ | 170 | 60.4 | 21.3 | Peru |
| [ | 251 | 71.5 | 21.0 | China, Japan |
| [ | 145 | 65.7 | 21.9 | Malaysia |
| Previous Studies | 805 | 67.2 | - | - |
| Current Study | 144 | 69.5 | 26.0 | Turkey |
| Summary | 949 | 67.5 | - | - |