| Literature DB >> 31766326 |
Pia S Zeiner1,2,3,4, Martina Kinzig5, Iris Divé1,2,3,4, Gabriele D Maurer1,2, Katharina Filipski2,3,6, Patrick N Harter2,3,4,6, Christian Senft7, Oliver Bähr1,8, Elke Hattingen2,3,9, Joachim P Steinbach1,2,3,4, Fritz Sörgel5,10, Martin Voss1,2,3,4, Eike Steidl2,3,9, Michael W Ronellenfitsch1,2,3,4.
Abstract
(1) Background: The phase 2 Regorafenib in Relapsed Glioblastoma (REGOMA) trial indicated a survival benefit for patients with first recurrence of a glioblastoma when treated with the multikinase inhibitor regorafenib (REG) instead of lomustine. The aim of this retrospective study was to investigate REG penetration to cerebrospinal fluid (CSF), treatment efficacy, and effects on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in patients with recurrent high-grade gliomas. (2)Entities:
Keywords: MRI patterns of gliomas; glioblastoma; malignant glioma; regorafenib; regorafenib csf concentration
Year: 2019 PMID: 31766326 PMCID: PMC6947028 DOI: 10.3390/jcm8122031
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Clin Med ISSN: 2077-0383 Impact factor: 4.241
Patient characteristics, previous treatments, concomitant therapy, and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) patterns.
| Characteristics | All Patients | Classic | T2-Dominant |
|---|---|---|---|
|
| |||
| Age, y, median (range) | 49 (37–80) | 40 (37–80) | 53 (38–72) |
| Female, % ( | 38 (8) | 29 (2) | 45 (5) |
| Karnofsky performance status scale, %, median (range) | 70 (50–100) | 80 (50–90) | 70 (50–100) |
|
| |||
| Isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH)-wildtype | 71 (15) | 71 (5) | 73 (8) |
| IDH-mutant | 19 (4) | 29 (2) | 18 (2) |
| IDH unknown | 10 (2) | 0 (0) | 9 (1) |
| 1p/19q co-deletion | 5 (1) | 0 (0) | 9 (1) |
| WHO IV | 81 (17) | 86 (6) | 73 (8) |
| WHO III | 19 (4) | 14 (1) | 24 (3) |
|
| |||
| Unmethylated | 33 (7) | 43 (3) | 27 (3) |
| Methylated | 38 (8) | 29 (2) | 55 (6) |
| Inconclusive | 19 (4) | 14 (1) | 9 (1) |
|
| |||
| No. of resections, median (range) | 1 (0–3) | 1 (1–2) | 1 (0–2) |
| Patients with 1 resection, % ( | 62 (13) | 86 (6) | 55 (6) |
| Patients with biopsy only, % ( | 5 (1) | 0 (0) | 9 (1) |
|
| |||
| No. of radiotherapies, median (range) | 2 (1–3) | 2 (1–2) | 1 (1–2) |
| Patients without radiotherapy, % ( | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) |
|
| |||
| No. of chemotherapies, median (range) | 2 (1–5) | 2 (1–3) | 2 (1–5) |
| Previous NovoTTF-100A, % ( | 24 (5) | 14 (1) | 27 (3) |
|
| |||
| No. of recurrences, median (range) | 2 (1–7) | 2 (1–4) | 2 (1–6) |
| Patients with 1 recurrence, % ( | 19 (4) | 14 (1) | 27 (3) |
|
| 553 (217–4525) | 561 (269–4515) | 508 (217–4384) |
|
| |||
| Regorafenib (REG) monotherapy | 90 (19) | 86 (6) | 91 (10) |
| REG + radiotherapy | 5 (1) | 0 (0) | 9 (1) |
| REG + temozolomide | 5 (1) | 14 (1) | 0 (0) |
|
| 49 (12–77) | 44 (20–56) | 49 (12–77) |
Figure 1Cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) and serum levels of regorafenib (REG). CSF and serum of patients 5, 17, and 18 was preserved during several time points of REG treatment. The concentrations of REG (blue diamonds) and the active REG metabolites demethylated REG N-oxide (red squares) and REG N-oxide (black triangles) are depicted. Ventricular CSF of patient 5 was obtained via Rickham reservoir puncture at different time points during treatment with REG (indicated by black bars, upper panel). For patients 17 and 18, only one sample at a single time point was available (lower panel). Lumbar puncture was performed in patient 17 on the first day of the second cycle of REG treatment (4.5 h after administration). In patient 18, the lumbar puncture was performed on day 22 of the first cycle, however the patient stopped REG after day 19 (>48 h after the last administration).
Figure 2Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) alterations in a regorafenib-induced T2-dominant progression pattern. (a) MRI scans were performed at baseline and the indicated intervals after initiation of REG therapy. T2 weighted images (T2, upper row), contrast enhanced T1 weighted images (T1 contrast, middle row), and apparent diffusion coefficients (ADC) maps (lower row) are depicted. “T2-dominant” progression is characterized by an overall decrease of contrast-enhancement and simultaneous increase in T2 hypointense tumor areas in the right frontal lobe. (b) Comparison of T1 contrast images at baseline and after 12 days. Areas of decreasing signal intensity are segmented in blue, areas of increasing intensity are segmented in red. (c) Color-coded perfusion map for leakage corrected cerebral blood volume (CBV) showing patchy, red areas with markedly increased CBV within the tumor outside of areas with reduced ADC. (d) Diffusion-weighted b 1000 image corresponding to corresponding ADC map at 55 days.
Safety profile.
| Characteristics | All Patients | Classic | T2-Dominant |
|---|---|---|---|
| Treatment, days, median (range) | 45 (19–139) | 37 (19–55) | 56 (28–139) |
| Regorafenib dose reduction, % ( | 19 (4) | 0 (0) | 18 (2) |
| Adverse Events, % ( | |||
| Skin reaction | 33 (7) | 29 (2) | 27 (3) |
| Elevated transaminases | 29 (6) | 29 (2) | 36 (4) |
| Fatigue | 19 (4) | 14 (1) | 18 (2) |
| Infection | 19 (4) | 14 (1) | 9 (1) |
| Myelosuppression | 19 (4) | 29 (2) | 9 (1) |
| Lung-artery embolization | 10 (2) | 0 (0) | 9 (1) |
Figure 3Association of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) progression patterns with overall survival. Kaplan-Meier survival curves were obtained by discriminating classic progressive disease (PD) in contrast to T2-dominant growth patterns (T2-dominant) in MRI as indicated in the figure. Curves were compared by log-rank (Mantel-Cox) test (p-values depicted). (a) Overall survival for patients with classic PD (n = 7) and T2-dominant growth pattern (n = 11) (median 10 vs. 27 weeks). (b) Overall survival for the subcohort of patients with IDH-wildtype (wt) WHO IV glioblastoma (classic PD n = 5, T2-dominant growth pattern n = 7) (median 10 vs. 20 weeks).
Regorafenib efficacy.
| Characteristics | All Patients | Classic | T2-Dominant |
|---|---|---|---|
| Steroid reduction, % ( | 10 (2) | 0 (0) | 18 (2) |
| Overall survival, weeks, median (range) | |||
| Total cohort | 14 (4–44) | 10 (6–24) | 27 (9–44) |
| Censored patients, % | 33 (7 of 21) | 0 (0 of 7) | 55 (6 of 11) |
| IDH-wildtype WHO IV patients | 10 (9–24) | 20 (9–44) | |
| Censored patients, % ( | 0 (0 of 5) | 57 (4 of 7) |