OBJECTIVE: We evaluated patterns of tumor progression in patients with recurrent glioblastoma who were treated withbevacizumab (BEV) alone or in combination with irinotecan (CPT-11) while participating in the BRAIN study. METHODS: An independent neuroradiologist reviewed MRI scans at baseline and progression in patients who received BEV (n = 85) orBEV+CPT-11 (n = 82) while on BRAIN. Tumor patterns were scored as local, distant, diffuse, or multifocal. Median progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were estimated using Kaplan-Meier methods. Hazard ratios for PFS and OS were estimated using a Cox regression model. RESULTS: Twenty-eight percent of patients who participated in BRAIN had nonlocal disease at baseline (72% local disease). Sixty-seven (79%) patients treated with single-agent BEV and 57 (70%) patients treated with BEV+CPT-11 experienced disease progression while on BRAIN. Most patients in each treatment group did not have a change in the radiographic pattern of their tumor (i.e., "no shift") at the time of progression. The proportion of BEV patients with no shift (82%) was greater than that of BEV+CPT-11 patients (53%, χ(2) p = 0.0004), and a greater proportion of BEV+CPT-11 patients (39%) compared with BEV patients (16%) experienced local-to-diffuse tumor pattern at progression (χ(2) p = 0.002). Patients treated with BEV or BEV+CPT-11 who had local-to-local or local-to-diffuse progression patterns had similar efficacy outcomes, including objective response, PFS, and OS. CONCLUSIONS: Most patients treated with BEV or BEV+CPT-11 on BRAIN did not experience a change from baseline in radiographic characteristics of disease at the time of progression.
RCT Entities:
OBJECTIVE: We evaluated patterns of tumor progression in patients with recurrent glioblastoma who were treated with bevacizumab (BEV) alone or in combination with irinotecan (CPT-11) while participating in the BRAIN study. METHODS: An independent neuroradiologist reviewed MRI scans at baseline and progression in patients who received BEV (n = 85) or BEV+CPT-11 (n = 82) while on BRAIN. Tumor patterns were scored as local, distant, diffuse, or multifocal. Median progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were estimated using Kaplan-Meier methods. Hazard ratios for PFS and OS were estimated using a Cox regression model. RESULTS: Twenty-eight percent of patients who participated in BRAIN had nonlocal disease at baseline (72% local disease). Sixty-seven (79%) patients treated with single-agent BEV and 57 (70%) patients treated with BEV+CPT-11 experienced disease progression while on BRAIN. Most patients in each treatment group did not have a change in the radiographic pattern of their tumor (i.e., "no shift") at the time of progression. The proportion of BEVpatients with no shift (82%) was greater than that of BEV+CPT-11patients (53%, χ(2) p = 0.0004), and a greater proportion of BEV+CPT-11patients (39%) compared with BEVpatients (16%) experienced local-to-diffuse tumor pattern at progression (χ(2) p = 0.002). Patients treated with BEV or BEV+CPT-11 who had local-to-local or local-to-diffuse progression patterns had similar efficacy outcomes, including objective response, PFS, and OS. CONCLUSIONS: Most patients treated with BEV or BEV+CPT-11 on BRAIN did not experience a change from baseline in radiographic characteristics of disease at the time of progression.
Authors: Tracy T Batchelor; David A Reardon; John F de Groot; Wolfgang Wick; Michael Weller Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2014-11-15 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: S Mong; B M Ellingson; P L Nghiemphu; H J Kim; L Mirsadraei; A Lai; W Yong; T M Zaw; T F Cloughesy; W B Pope Journal: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol Date: 2012-04-26 Impact factor: 3.825
Authors: N Bahrami; D Piccioni; R Karunamuni; Y-H Chang; N White; R Delfanti; T M Seibert; J A Hattangadi-Gluth; A Dale; N Farid; C R McDonald Journal: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol Date: 2018-04-05 Impact factor: 3.825
Authors: Benedikt Wiestler; Alexander Radbruch; Matthias Osswald; Stephanie E Combs; Christine Jungk; Frank Winkler; Martin Bendszus; Andreas Unterberg; Michael Platten; Wolfgang Wick; Antje Wick Journal: J Neurooncol Date: 2014-01-24 Impact factor: 4.130
Authors: David Cachia; Nabil A Elshafeey; Carlos Kamiya-Matsuoka; Masumeh Hatami; Kristin D Alfaro-Munoz; Jacob J Mandel; Rivka Colen; John F DeGroot Journal: J Neurooncol Date: 2017-07-12 Impact factor: 4.130
Authors: Hikmat Assi; Marianela Candolfi; Gregory Baker; Yohei Mineharu; Pedro R Lowenstein; Maria G Castro Journal: Neurosci Lett Date: 2012-08-10 Impact factor: 3.046