Literature DB >> 31763874

Methodological considerations for developing and evaluating response bias indicators.

Danielle Burchett1, Yossef S Ben-Porath2.   

Abstract

In the near-100 years of their existence, response bias indicators have undergone significant advancements in design, as have efforts at examining their validity. However, opportunities remain for greater sophistication in the development and study of these indicators. We discuss important definitional issues pertaining to response bias before turning to a review of common methods used in this area of research followed by discussion of innovations that could further advance response bias investigation. Specifically, we focus on considerations for conducting research on the need for, evaluation, and design of response bias indicators. We review established and innovative research approaches and how they can be used to further this line of work. Throughout, we identify areas in need of additional study as we work to advance knowledge about the impact of invalid responding and the utility of the indicators available to detect it. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2019 APA, all rights reserved).

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31763874     DOI: 10.1037/pas0000680

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychol Assess        ISSN: 1040-3590


  2 in total

1.  The Implementation of the WHO's Surgical Safety Checklist by Italian Operating Teams: A Descriptive Study.

Authors:  Fabio Ferraiuolo; Angelo Dante; Cristina Petrucci; Gülten Güvenç; Loreto Lancia
Journal:  Florence Nightingale J Nurs       Date:  2022-02

2.  Characterizing Early Changes in Quality of Life in Young Women With Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Hend M Al-Kaylani; Bradley T Loeffler; Sarah L Mott; Melissa Curry; Sneha Phadke; Ellen van der Plas
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2022-05-06
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.