Marian F Laughery1, John J Wyrick1. 1. School of Molecular Biosciences, Washington State University, Pullman, Washington.
Abstract
CRISPR-Cas9 has emerged as a powerful method for editing the genome in a wide variety of species, since it can generate a specific DNA break when targeted by the Cas9-bound guide RNA. In yeast, Cas9-targeted DNA breaks are used to promote homologous recombination with a mutagenic template DNA, in order to rapidly generate genome edits (e.g., DNA substitutions, insertions, or deletions) encoded in the template DNA. Since repeated Cas9-induced DNA breaks select against unedited cells, Cas9 can be used to generate marker-free genome edits. Here, we describe a simple protocol for constructing Cas9-expressing plasmids containing a user-designed guide RNA, as well as protocols for using these plasmids for efficient genome editing in yeast.
CRISPR-Cas9 has emerged as a powerful method for editing the genome in a wide variety of species, since it can generate a specific DNA break when targeted by the Cas9-bound guide RNA. In yeast, Cas9-targeted DNA breaks are used to promote homologous recombination with a mutagenic template DNA, in order to rapidly generate genome edits (e.g., DNA substitutions, insertions, or deletions) encoded in the template DNA. Since repeated Cas9-induced DNA breaks select against unedited cells, Cas9 can be used to generate marker-free genome edits. Here, we describe a simple protocol for constructing Cas9-expressing plasmids containing a user-designed guide RNA, as well as protocols for using these plasmids for efficient genome editing in yeast.
Authors: Martin Jinek; Krzysztof Chylinski; Ines Fonfara; Michael Hauer; Jennifer A Doudna; Emmanuelle Charpentier Journal: Science Date: 2012-06-28 Impact factor: 47.728
Authors: Marian F Laughery; Tierra Hunter; Alexander Brown; James Hoopes; Travis Ostbye; Taven Shumaker; John J Wyrick Journal: Yeast Date: 2015-09-21 Impact factor: 3.239
Authors: Owen W Ryan; Jeffrey M Skerker; Matthew J Maurer; Xin Li; Jordan C Tsai; Snigdha Poddar; Michael E Lee; Will DeLoache; John E Dueber; Adam P Arkin; Jamie H D Cate Journal: Elife Date: 2014-08-19 Impact factor: 8.140
Authors: Kevin R Roy; Justin D Smith; Sibylle C Vonesch; Gen Lin; Chelsea Szu Tu; Alex R Lederer; Angela Chu; Sundari Suresh; Michelle Nguyen; Joe Horecka; Ashutosh Tripathi; Wallace T Burnett; Maddison A Morgan; Julia Schulz; Kevin M Orsley; Wu Wei; Raeka S Aiyar; Ronald W Davis; Vytas A Bankaitis; James E Haber; Marc L Salit; Robert P St Onge; Lars M Steinmetz Journal: Nat Biotechnol Date: 2018-05-07 Impact factor: 54.908
Authors: Marian F Laughery; Alexander J Brown; Kaitlynne A Bohm; Smitha Sivapragasam; Haley S Morris; Mila Tchmola; Angelica D Washington; Debra Mitchell; Stephen Mather; Ewa P Malc; Piotr A Mieczkowski; Steven A Roberts; John J Wyrick Journal: Cell Rep Date: 2020-11-17 Impact factor: 9.423