Literature DB >> 31763331

A Cross-Sectional Analysis of the BC Children's Hospital Cleft Palate Program Waitlist.

Leslie Tze Fung Leung1, Christine A Loock2, Rebecca Courtemanche1,3, Douglas J Courtemanche1,3.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: A 2016 review of the BC Children's Hospital Cleft Palate - Craniofacial Program (CPP) revealed that one-third of patients met the program's care recommendations and half met the American Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Association guidelines. This study reviews patients on the CPP waitlist and determines median wait times and missed clinical assessments as well as identifies how wait times are influenced by medical complexity, specialized speech service needs, vulnerability, and distance from clinic.
DESIGN: Cross-sectional.
SETTING: BC Children's Hospital Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Program. PATIENTS: Five hundred seventy-six waitlisted patients. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Additional wait time after recommended appointment date. Correlation of additional wait time with diagnosis, number of specialists required, speech services needed, vulnerability, and distance from the clinic. Missed plastic surgery, speech, and orthodontic assessments according to CPP team recommendations and ACPA guidelines.
RESULTS: Patients had a median additional wait time of 11 months (interquartile range: 5-27). Longer additional wait times were associated with a craniofacial diagnosis (P = .019), a need for formal speech assessments or evaluations (P < .001), or a requirement to see multiple specialists (P < .001). Vulnerability and distance from clinic did not affect wait times. Plastic surgery assessments were not available at the preschool and preteen time points for 45 (8%) patients, 355 (62%) patients were unable to access speech assessments, and 120 (21%) were unable to complete an orthodontic assessment.
CONCLUSION: Patients wait up to an additional year to be seen by the CPP and miss speech, orthodontic, and surgical assessments at key developmental milestones. Additional resources are required to address these concerns.
© 2019 The Author(s).

Entities:  

Keywords:  cleft palate; multidisciplinary clinic; quality improvement

Year:  2019        PMID: 31763331      PMCID: PMC6851733          DOI: 10.1177/2292550319876664

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Plast Surg (Oakv)        ISSN: 2292-5503            Impact factor:   0.947


  14 in total

1.  Revisiting the social history for child health.

Authors:  Chén Kenyon; Megan Sandel; Michael Silverstein; Alefiya Shakir; Barry Zuckerman
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 7.124

2.  Parameters for evaluation and treatment of patients with cleft lip/palate or other craniofacial anomalies. American Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Association. March, 1993.

Authors: 
Journal:  Cleft Palate Craniofac J       Date:  1993-03

3.  Long term follow up study of survival associated with cleft lip and palate at birth.

Authors:  Kaare Christensen; Knud Juel; Anne Maria Herskind; Jeffrey C Murray
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2004-05-14

4.  Classification of Cleft Lip/Palate: Then and Now.

Authors:  Alexander C Allori; John B Mulliken; John G Meara; Stephen Shusterman; Jeffrey R Marcus
Journal:  Cleft Palate Craniofac J       Date:  2015-09-04

5.  Waiting for scheduled services in Canada: development of priority-setting scoring systems.

Authors:  T W Noseworthy; J J McGurran; D C Hadorn
Journal:  J Eval Clin Pract       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 2.431

Review 6.  The impact of orofacial clefts on quality of life and healthcare use and costs.

Authors:  G L Wehby; C H Cassell
Journal:  Oral Dis       Date:  2009-07-27       Impact factor: 3.511

7.  The Epidemiology of Cleft Lip and Palate in Canada, 1998 to 2007.

Authors:  Jennifer L K Matthews; Elizabeth Oddone-Paolucci; Robertston A Harrop
Journal:  Cleft Palate Craniofac J       Date:  2014-07-09

8.  Developing a universal tool for the prioritization of patients waiting for elective surgery.

Authors:  Maite Solans-Domènech; Paula Adam; Cristian Tebé; Mireia Espallargues
Journal:  Health Policy       Date:  2013-08-07       Impact factor: 2.980

9.  A Standard Set of Outcome Measures for the Comprehensive Appraisal of Cleft Care.

Authors:  Alexander C Allori; Thomas Kelley; John G Meara; Asteria Albert; Krishnamurthy Bonanthaya; Kathy Chapman; Michael Cunningham; John Daskalogiannakis; Henriette de Gier; Andrew A Heggie; Cristina Hernandez; Oksana Jackson; Yin Jones; Loshan Kangesu; Maarten J Koudstaal; Rajiv Kuchhal; Anette Lohmander; Ross E Long; Leanne Magee; Laura Monson; Elizabeth Rose; Thomas J Sitzman; Jesse A Taylor; Guy Thorburn; Simon van Eeden; Chris Williams; John O Wirthlin; Karen W Wong
Journal:  Cleft Palate Craniofac J       Date:  2016-05-25

10.  Cleft Care UK study. Part 5: child psychosocial outcomes and satisfaction with cleft services.

Authors:  A Waylen; A R Ness; A K Wills; M Persson; N Rumsey; J R Sandy
Journal:  Orthod Craniofac Res       Date:  2015-11       Impact factor: 1.826

View more
  1 in total

1.  The Hong Kong Principles for assessing researchers: Fostering research integrity.

Authors:  David Moher; Lex Bouter; Sabine Kleinert; Paul Glasziou; Mai Har Sham; Virginia Barbour; Anne-Marie Coriat; Nicole Foeger; Ulrich Dirnagl
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2020-07-16       Impact factor: 8.029

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.