| Literature DB >> 27223626 |
Alexander C Allori, Thomas Kelley, John G Meara, Asteria Albert, Krishnamurthy Bonanthaya, Kathy Chapman, Michael Cunningham, John Daskalogiannakis, Henriette de Gier, Andrew A Heggie, Cristina Hernandez, Oksana Jackson, Yin Jones, Loshan Kangesu, Maarten J Koudstaal, Rajiv Kuchhal, Anette Lohmander, Ross E Long, Leanne Magee, Laura Monson, Elizabeth Rose, Thomas J Sitzman, Jesse A Taylor, Guy Thorburn, Simon van Eeden, Chris Williams, John O Wirthlin, Karen W Wong.
Abstract
Care of the patient with cleft lip and/or palate remains complex. Prior attempts at aggregating data to study the effectiveness of specific interventions or overall treatment protocols have been hindered by a lack of data standards. There exists a critical need to better define the outcomes-particularly those that matter most to patients and their families-and to standardize the methods by which these outcomes will be measured. This report summarizes the recommendations of an international, multidisciplinary working group with regard to which outcomes a typical cleft team could track, how those outcomes could be measured and recorded, and what strategies may be employed to sustainably implement a system for prospective data collection. It is only by agreeing on a common, standard set of outcome measures for the comprehensive appraisal of cleft care that intercenter comparisons can become possible. This is important for quality-improvement endeavors, comparative effectiveness research, and value-based health-care reform.Entities:
Keywords: cleft lip; cleft palate; continuous quality improvement; learning health care; outcomes; patient-reported outcomes; value-based health care
Mesh:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27223626 DOI: 10.1597/15-292
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Cleft Palate Craniofac J ISSN: 1055-6656