Literature DB >> 31763287

Functional Endoscopic Sinus Surgery of Nasal Polyposis: The Vexing Question of Whether to Resect or Preserve Middle Turbinate.

Manaswita Roy1, Himani Lade1.   

Abstract

Functional endoscopic sinus surgery is the mainstay of surgical management of nasal polyposis since 1975. The decision between the partial resection and preservation of the middle turbinate (MT) has stirred up considerable debate. Partial MTR permits easy access to the affected paranasal sinuses intraoperatively and postoperatively. However, there may be alteration of nasal function, frontal sinusitis and anosmia. Preservation of middle turbinate is precludes these complications, and allows the MT to serve as a vital anatomical landmark for revision surgery. Therefore, our study compared the outcomes of the two approaches to aid surgeons in deciding the best possible approach. Randomized control trial. 31 patients (60 sides of nasal cavity) with nasal polyposis were divided into two groups. Group I consisted of 30 sides of nasal cavity with middle turbinate resection, while group II consisted of 30 sides of nasal cavity without middle turbinate resection. Both the groups were compared postoperatively for 6 months. In group I and group II, 5 sides (16.6%) and 11 sides (36.6%) showed polypoidal changes respectively. 3 sides (10%) in group I and 8 sides (26.6%) in group II showed blockage of maxillary sinus ostia. All the sides in group I had patency of frontal sinus. In group II, 5 sides (16.6%) showed blockage of frontal sinus ostia. The maxillary antrostomy patency in group I and group II were 90% (27) and 73.33% (22) respectively. Assessment of symptomatic improvements for nasal obstruction, hyposmia, headache and rhinorrhoea was done using questionnaires. Symptomatic improvement was higher in group I compared to group II with statistical significance (p = 0.001). Our study demonstrated that partial resection of middle turbinate decreased the chances of recurrence of disease and post-operative complications and resulted in significantly better symptomatic improvements. © Association of Otolaryngologists of India 2018.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Functional endoscopic sinus surgery; Middle turbinate; Nasal polyposis

Year:  2018        PMID: 31763287      PMCID: PMC6848682          DOI: 10.1007/s12070-018-1450-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg        ISSN: 2231-3796


  18 in total

1.  Comparison of functional endonasal sinus surgery with and without partial middle turbinate resection.

Authors:  T E Havas; D S Lowinger
Journal:  Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 1.547

2.  Rhinosinusitis: Developing guidance for clinical trials.

Authors:  Eli O Meltzer; Daniel L Hamilos; James A Hadley; Donald C Lanza; Bradley F Marple; Richard A Nicklas; Allen D Adinoff; Claus Bachert; Larry Borish; Vernon M Chinchilli; Melvyn R Danzig; Berrylin J Ferguson; Wytske J Fokkens; Stephen G Jenkins; Valerie J Lund; Mahmood F Mafee; Robert M Naclerio; Ruby Pawankar; Jens U Ponikau; Mark S Schubert; Raymond G Slavin; Michael G Stewart; Alkis Togias; Ellen R Wald; Birgit Winther
Journal:  Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 3.497

3.  Middle meatus anstrostomy: patency rates and risk factors.

Authors:  W E Davis; J W Templer; W R Lamear; W E Davis; S B Craig
Journal:  Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  1991-04       Impact factor: 3.497

Review 4.  Clinical effects of middle turbinate resection after endoscopic sinus surgery: a systematic review.

Authors:  Garret W Choby; Candace E Hobson; Stella Lee; Eric W Wang
Journal:  Am J Rhinol Allergy       Date:  2014 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 2.467

5.  Does the Timing of Middle Turbinate Resection Influence Quality-of-Life Outcomes for Patients with Chronic Rhinosinusitis?

Authors:  George A Scangas; Aaron K Remenschneider; Benjamin S Bleier; Eric H Holbrook; Stacey T Gray; Ralph B Metson
Journal:  Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2017-05-16       Impact factor: 3.497

6.  Factors affecting time to revision sinus surgery for nasal polyps: a 25-year experience.

Authors:  Arthur W Wu; Jonathan Y Ting; Michael P Platt; Hien T Tierney; Ralph Metson
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  2013-07-29       Impact factor: 3.325

7.  Middle turbinate preservation versus middle turbinate resection in endoscopic surgical treatment of nasal polyposis.

Authors:  Daniele Marchioni; Matteo Alicandri-Ciufelli; Francesco Mattioli; Alessio Marchetti; Gordana Jovic; Federica Massone; Livio Presutti
Journal:  Acta Otolaryngol       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 1.494

8.  Recurrence rates after endoscopic sinus surgery for massive sinus polyposis.

Authors:  Rhoda Wynn; Gady Har-El
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 3.325

9.  Incidence of frontal sinusitis following partial middle turbinectomy.

Authors:  D S Fortune; J A Duncavage
Journal:  Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol       Date:  1998-06       Impact factor: 1.547

Review 10.  Effect of partial middle turbinectomy on nasal airflow and resistance.

Authors:  P R Cook; A Begegni; W C Bryant; W E Davis
Journal:  Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  1995-10       Impact factor: 5.591

View more
  2 in total

1.  Clinical characteristics in unilateral vestibular atelectasis.

Authors:  Morgane Marc; Charlotte Hautefort; Jean-Pierre Guichard; Philippe Herman; Emmanuel Houdart; Michel Toupet; Michael Eliezer
Journal:  J Neurol       Date:  2020-09-09       Impact factor: 4.849

2.  Characteristics of Chronic Rhinosinusitis with Nasal Polyps Based on Allergic Mucin and Fungal Elements in Patients Undergoing Revision Endoscopic Sinus Surgery.

Authors:  Lisa Mary Cherian; Rakesh R Bright; Lalee Varghese; V Rupa; Regi Kurien
Journal:  Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2021-08-27
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.