Literature DB >> 23712679

Factors affecting time to revision sinus surgery for nasal polyps: a 25-year experience.

Arthur W Wu1, Jonathan Y Ting, Michael P Platt, Hien T Tierney, Ralph Metson.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESIS: Surgical treatment for chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (CRSwNP) is often followed by polyp regrowth with return of symptoms. The purpose of this study is to identify clinical factors that influence the time interval to revision sinus surgery in patients with nasal polyps. STUDY
DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study.
METHODS: Records of 299 individuals who underwent two or more surgeries for the diagnosis of nasal polyps by the senior author (RM) from 1987 through 2011 were reviewed. The time between surgical interventions were compared to patient demographics, comorbidities, endoscopic examination, computed tomography (CT) stage, extent of surgery, and pathologic findings.
RESULTS: The mean time interval between polyp surgeries was 4.87 ± 3.61 years (range 0.7-18.6 years). The median time to revision surgery was shorter in patients who smoked compared to nonsmokers (2.82 vs. 4.31 years, respectively, P = .022) and longer in patients who underwent middle turbinate resection rather than preservation (4.56 vs. 3.93 years, respectively, P = .048). Kaplan-Meier survival analysis confirmed these findings, but the beneficial effect of turbinectomy appeared to dissipate by 8 years. Neither a history of asthma nor advanced CT stage influenced the time to revision surgery.
CONCLUSION: The time course between sinus surgeries in patients with regrowth of nasal polyps appears to be affected by certain modifiable extrinsic factors, including smoking on the part of the patient and operative technique on the part of the surgeon. The performance of middle turbinate resection during sinus surgery appears to extend the time interval until a revision procedure is required.
© 2013 The American Laryngological, Rhinological and Otological Society, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Nasal polyps; chronic rhinosinusitis; endoscopic sinus surgery; revision sinus surgery

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23712679     DOI: 10.1002/lary.24213

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Laryngoscope        ISSN: 0023-852X            Impact factor:   3.325


  24 in total

Review 1.  Comprehensive review on endonasal endoscopic sinus surgery.

Authors:  Rainer K Weber; Werner Hosemann
Journal:  GMS Curr Top Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2015-12-22

2.  Long-term revision rates for endoscopic sinus surgery.

Authors:  Kristine A Smith; Richard R Orlandi; Gretchen Oakley; Huong Meeks; Karen Curtin; Jeremiah A Alt
Journal:  Int Forum Allergy Rhinol       Date:  2018-12-20       Impact factor: 3.858

3.  Surgical treatment for nasal polyposis: predictors of outcome.

Authors:  Marko Velimir Grgić; Hrvoje Ćupić; Livije Kalogjera; Tomislav Baudoin
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2015-01-30       Impact factor: 2.503

4.  Cadmium and nickel in blood of Tunisian population and risk of nasosinusal polyposis disease.

Authors:  Rim Khlifi; Pablo Olmedo; Fernando Gil; Bouthaina Hammami; Amel Hamza-Chaffai
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2014-09-26       Impact factor: 4.223

5.  Prevalence of polyp recurrence after endoscopic sinus surgery for chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyposis.

Authors:  Adam S DeConde; Jess C Mace; Joshua M Levy; Luke Rudmik; Jeremiah A Alt; Timothy L Smith
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  2016-11-12       Impact factor: 3.325

6.  Functional Endoscopic Sinus Surgery of Nasal Polyposis: The Vexing Question of Whether to Resect or Preserve Middle Turbinate.

Authors:  Manaswita Roy; Himani Lade
Journal:  Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2018-07-14

7.  Revision rates and time to revision following endoscopic sinus surgery: A large database analysis.

Authors:  Nathan R Stein; Aria Jafari; Adam S DeConde
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  2017-07-08       Impact factor: 3.325

Review 8.  Eosinophilic chronic rhinosinusitis in East Asians.

Authors:  En-Tong Wang; Yan Zheng; Peng-Fei Liu; Li-Juan Guo
Journal:  World J Clin Cases       Date:  2014-12-16       Impact factor: 1.337

9.  Longitudinal improvement and stability of the SNOT-22 survey in the evaluation of surgical management for chronic rhinosinusitis.

Authors:  Adam S DeConde; Jess C Mace; Jeremiah A Alt; Luke Rudmik; Zachary M Soler; Timothy L Smith
Journal:  Int Forum Allergy Rhinol       Date:  2014-12-15       Impact factor: 3.858

10.  Peripheral eosinophil count and eosinophil-to-lymphocyte ratio are associated with revision sinus surgery.

Authors:  Karina Bayer; Selmir Hamidovic; Faris F Brkic; Gerold Besser; Christian A Mueller; David T Liu
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2022-06-23       Impact factor: 2.503

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.