| Literature DB >> 31763158 |
Hong Wang1, Jia Jia2,3, Lu Wang2,4, Keith Butler5, Rui Song2, Gilberto Casillas6, Le He4, Nazir P Kherani3, Doug D Perovic3, Liqiang Jing7, Aron Walsh8,9, Roland Dittmeyer10, Geoffrey A Ozin2.
Abstract
To achieve substantial reductions in CO2 emissions, catalysts for the photoreduction of CO2 into value-added chemicals and fuels will most likely be at the heart of key renewable-energy technologies. Despite tremendous efforts, developing highly active and selective CO2 reduction photocatalysts remains a great challenge. Herein, a metal oxide heterostructure engineering strategy that enables the gas-phase, photocatalytic, heterogeneous hydrogenation of CO2 to CO with high performance metrics (i.e., the conversion rate of CO2 to CO reached as high as 1400 µmol g cat-1 h-1) is reported. The catalyst is comprised of indium oxide nanocrystals, In2O3- x (OH) y , nucleated and grown on the surface of niobium pentoxide (Nb2O5) nanorods. The heterostructure between In2O3- x (OH) y nanocrystals and the Nb2O5 nanorod support increases the concentration of oxygen vacancies and prolongs excited state (electron and hole) lifetimes. Together, these effects result in a dramatically improved photocatalytic performance compared to the isolated In2O3- x (OH) y material. The defect optimized heterostructure exhibits a 44-fold higher conversion rate than pristine In2O3- x (OH) y . It also exhibits selective conversion of CO2 to CO as well as long-term operational stability.Entities:
Keywords: CO2 conversion; charge transfer; heterostructures; photocatalysts; semiconductors
Year: 2019 PMID: 31763158 PMCID: PMC6864495 DOI: 10.1002/advs.201902170
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Adv Sci (Weinh) ISSN: 2198-3844 Impact factor: 16.806
Figure 1a) Illustration of the synthesis of In2O3− (OH) nanocrystals grown on the surface of Nb2O5 nanorods. b) PXRD patterns of pristine In2O3− (OH) and Nb2O5, a chemical heterostructure In2O3− (OH)@Nb2O5. c) XPS and curve fitting for the In 3d5/2 and In 3d3/2 core level, spin–orbit split binding energies of pristine In2O3− (OH), a physical mixture In2O3− (OH)/Nb2O5 and a representative chemical heterostructure In2O3− (OH)@Nb2O5, S3 sample. d) O 1s XPS spectrum of S3 and physical mixture sample. e) Deconvolution of the high‐resolution O1s XPS spectrum of the S3 sample. The main peak at 530.3 eV is attributed to indium oxide. The two additional shoulder peaks at 531.7 and 532.5 eV are attributed to oxygen vacancies in the structure and surface OH groups, respectively.
Figure 2a) Low‐resolution TEM image of S3. Yellow circle indicates that In2O3− (OH) nanocrystal with a diameter of ≈4 nm was grown on the surface of Nb2O5 nanorod. b) HRTEM images of S3. c–f) STEM image and corresponding EFTEM elemental (Nb, In, O) mapping.
Figure 3a) Digital photographs of as‐prepared pristine In2O3− (OH), S1‐S4, and Nb2O5. b) Digital photograph of S3 sample deposited on borosilicate filter film for photocatalytic measurement. c) Photocatalytic performance of the listed materials. d) Long‐term photocatalyst stability measurements of the S3 sample.
Figure 4a) Transient state surface photovoltage responses of S3, pristine In2O3− (OH), and a physical mixture of In2O3− (OH) and Nb2O5 nanorods, using 355 nm laser excitation. b) Fluorescence decay temporal profiles measured and fit for S3 and pristine In2O3− (OH).