| Literature DB >> 31762906 |
Béatrice Dambaya1,2, Céline Nguefeu Nkenfou1,3, Georgia Ambada1,2, George Mondinde Ikomey4, Linda Mekue Mouafo5, Nicole Ngoufack2, Elvis Ndukong Ndzi5, Georges Této1, Aubin Nanfack1, Nelson Sonela1,2, Joseph Fokam1, Njiokou Flobert2, Vittorio Colizzi1,6, Alexis Ndjolo1,4.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: The number of HIV exposed uninfected (HEU) infants is increasing as vertical transmission is reducing. This subpopulation requires more investigations. This study aimed at comparing the expression level of soluble Fas receptors (FasR) and ligands (FasL) between HIV infected, HEU and unexposed children.Entities:
Keywords: FasL; FasR; HIV; exposed non-infected children; expression level; infected children
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31762906 PMCID: PMC6859037 DOI: 10.11604/pamj.2019.34.39.15038
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Pan Afr Med J
Description of the study population
| Gender | N = (212) | % |
|---|---|---|
| Male | 100 | 47.20 |
| Female | 112 | 52.80 |
| < 5 | 94 | 44.33 |
| 5-10 | 55 | 25.94 |
| >10 | 63 | 29.71 |
| Initiation of ART | 44 | 50 |
| At birth | 5 | 11.36 |
| After 1-2 | 8 | 18.18 |
| After 3-5 | 8 | 18.18 |
| After 6-8 | 6 | 13.63 |
| > 8 | 15 | 34.09 |
| Unknown | 2 | 4.54 |
| ART-Naïve | 44 | 50 |
| HIV exposed uninfected (HEU) | 86 | 69.35 |
| HIV unexposed | 38 | 30.64 |
Figure 1Plasma concentration of Fas ligands (FasL) (A) and Fas receptors (FasR) (B) in HIV infected and uninfected children (HEU and unexposed)
Figure 2Plasma concentration of Fas ligands (A) and Fas receptors (B) in control (unexposed), HEU (Exposed Uninfected) and HIV+ (infected children). **=0.01; ***=0.001; ****=0.0001; NS: not significant
Figure 3Correlation between CD4+ cell count (percentage and absolute value) and plasma concentration of Fas ligands (A (ARV naives, %CD4), B (ARV treated, %CD4), C (ARV naives, absolute CD4), D (ARV treated, absolute CD4)) and Fas receptors (E, (ARV naives, %CD4), F (ARV treated, %CD4), G (ARV naives, absolute CD4), H (ARV treated, absolute CD4)) in 44 ARV naives and 44 ARV treated children
Figure 4Correlation between viral load and plasma level of FasL (A) and FasR (B) in HIV infected children
Correlation between Fas Ligand (FasL) and Fas Receptor (FasR) plasma levels in HIV infected ART-naives and ART-treated children with HIV-1 Viral Load (VL)
| FasL levels | FasR levels | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| rs p value | rs p value | |||
| VL of HIV infected children | +0.40 | 0.00 | +0.12 | 0.30 |
| VL of HIV infected ART Naives children | - 0.30 | 0.04 | +0.30 | 0.04 |
| VL of HIV infected ART Treated children | +0.20 | 0.03 | - 0.26 | 0.20 |
rs= Spearman’s correlation at 95% confidence interval (CI), VL= Viral load in ART-treated and ART-naives children