Elyse Ladbrook1,2, Stéphane L Bouchoucha1,2,3, Ana Hutchinson1,2,3. 1. Deakin University, Geelong, Australia. 2. School of Nursing and Midwifery, Centre for Quality and Patient Safety Research, Australia. 3. Deakin University Geelong, Centre for Quality and Patient Safety Research, Epworth Healthcare Partnership, Australia.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) is a common avoidable healthcare associated infection in ventilated critical care patients that can have a detrimental impact on patient recovery. To increase uptake at a local level, care bundles should be designed and implemented in collaboration with the end-users who will implement the bundle into practice. AIM/ OBJECTIVE: The aim in this study was to evaluate critical care nurses' perceptions of the usability of a respiratory care bundle as an effective approach to VAP prevention. METHODS: An exploratory descriptive qualitative study was conducted. A respiratory care bundle consisting of five components was implemented over a 4-week period. Following implementation, a focus group and semi-structured interviews were conducted to obtain nurses' feedback on the useability of the care bundle. Seven intensive care nurses caring for ventilated patients participated in the study. FINDINGS/ RESULTS: Participants confirmed that using a care bundle provided a structured approach to nursing care of a ventilated patient and that the use of checklist reminders at the bedside was useful in a busy practice environment. Barriers to uptake and implementation of the bundle were that the unit culture did not prioritise preventative care and the need for a structured interdisciplinary approach to sedation and weaning of mechanical ventilation. DISCUSSION: To successfully imbed all elements of a respiratory care bundle into practice; an interdisciplinary approach is needed in which there is a strong emphasis on preventative care. These findings highlight the advantages of involving end-users in the development of strategies to decrease VAP.
BACKGROUND: Ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) is a common avoidable healthcare associated infection in ventilated critical care patients that can have a detrimental impact on patient recovery. To increase uptake at a local level, care bundles should be designed and implemented in collaboration with the end-users who will implement the bundle into practice. AIM/ OBJECTIVE: The aim in this study was to evaluate critical care nurses' perceptions of the usability of a respiratory care bundle as an effective approach to VAP prevention. METHODS: An exploratory descriptive qualitative study was conducted. A respiratory care bundle consisting of five components was implemented over a 4-week period. Following implementation, a focus group and semi-structured interviews were conducted to obtain nurses' feedback on the useability of the care bundle. Seven intensive care nurses caring for ventilated patients participated in the study. FINDINGS/ RESULTS: Participants confirmed that using a care bundle provided a structured approach to nursing care of a ventilated patient and that the use of checklist reminders at the bedside was useful in a busy practice environment. Barriers to uptake and implementation of the bundle were that the unit culture did not prioritise preventative care and the need for a structured interdisciplinary approach to sedation and weaning of mechanical ventilation. DISCUSSION: To successfully imbed all elements of a respiratory care bundle into practice; an interdisciplinary approach is needed in which there is a strong emphasis on preventative care. These findings highlight the advantages of involving end-users in the development of strategies to decrease VAP.
Authors: J Rello; E Afonso; T Lisboa; M Ricart; B Balsera; A Rovira; J Valles; E Diaz Journal: Clin Microbiol Infect Date: 2012-03-22 Impact factor: 8.067
Authors: Michele C Balas; William J Burke; David Gannon; Marlene Z Cohen; Lois Colburn; Catherine Bevil; Doug Franz; Keith M Olsen; E Wesley Ely; Eduard E Vasilevskis Journal: Crit Care Med Date: 2013-09 Impact factor: 7.598