| Literature DB >> 31762655 |
David E Rivera1, Yanet C Ocampo1, Jenny P Castro1, Lía Barrios2, Fredyc Diaz3, Luis A Franco1.
Abstract
The use of natural products by communities from the Colombian Caribbean region to treat health issues, together with biodiversity and geographical features, constitute a great scenery to develop new therapies based on ethnopharmacological heritage. Here, we investigated the anti-inflammatory potential of 10 commonly used plants in Colombian folk medicine, evaluating their effect on nitric oxide (NO) production by LPS-stimulated RAW 264.7 macrophages. The most active plant was evaluated in vivo using 12-O-tetradecanoyl-phorbol-13-acetate (TPA)-induced mouse ear edema, along with its effect on the production of pro-inflammatory mediators in vitro. The extract of Physalis angulata L. calyces showed the highest activity. This extract was fractionated and its dichloromethane fraction (DF) was the most active in vitro, inhibiting the production of NO, prostaglandin E2 (PGE2), interleukin (IL)-1β, IL-6, tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α and monocyte chemotactic protein (MCP)-1 (CCL2). In vivo, DF showed a significant inhibition of ear edema and myeloperoxidase (MPO) activity, with evident reduction of the leukocyte infiltration into tissue. Our results support the ethnopharmacological use of the selected plants in folk medicine. P. angulata dichloromethane fraction represents a promising source of pharmacological compounds with great potential therapeutic use to treat inflammatory illness.Entities:
Keywords: Anti-inflammatory; Folk medicine; Macrophages; Nitric oxide; Physalis angulata
Year: 2018 PMID: 31762655 PMCID: PMC6864190 DOI: 10.1016/j.sjbs.2018.05.030
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Saudi J Biol Sci ISSN: 2213-7106 Impact factor: 4.219
List of selected medicinal plant species employed in Colombian Caribbean Region to treat inflammatory related diseases including their ethno-pharmacological characteristics.
| Scientific name | Local name | ethnopharmacological use | Part used | Mode of preparation/administration route | Reference |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Algodón de seda | Headache | Roots | Exudate/Oral | ||
| Cola de caballo | Respiratory Conditions | Leaves | Infusion/Oral | ||
| Sauce sabanero | Bronchitis | Bark, Buds | Oil Decoction, Infusion/Oral | ||
| Croton | Rheumatism | Bark | Infusion/Oral | ||
| Flor de muerto | Inflammation | Leaves | Fresh plant in maceration/Cataplasm | ||
| Chupadera | Snakebite | Root | Poultice/Topic | ||
| Palomora | Inflammation | Bark | Latex Drops/Topic | ||
| Juan de Dios | Inflammation and Infections | Leaves | Decoction/Oral | ||
| Topo toropo | Inflammation and Infections | Calyces | Poultice/Topic | ||
| Palo de rosa | Inflammation | Bark |
Plant information: list of evaluated plants, collection sites, vouchers, organs used, extraction solvent and yields.
| Scientific name | Collection site | Voucher number | Used part | Extract yields (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Galerazamba, Bolívar (10°47′52″N 75°15′41″W) | HUA175327 | Leaves | 9,73 | |
| San Bernardo del Viento, Cordoba (9°21′18″N 75°57′16″W) | HUA166134 | Whole Plant | 6,79 | |
| Pueblo Nuevo, Bolívar (10°44′26″N 75°15′43″W) | HUA175329 | Flowers | 11,59 | |
| Galerazamba, Bolívar (10°47′22″N 75°15′36″W) | JBC 12,008 | Bark | 8,82 | |
| Pueblo Nuevo, Bolívar (10°44′33″N 75°15′28″W) | HUA175331 | Leaves | 6,92 | |
| La Unión, Sucre (8°51′37″N 75°16′48″W) | HUA 189,121 | Root | N.D. | |
| Pueblo Nuevo, Bolívar (10°44′42″N 75°15′48″W) | JBC 12,013 | Bark | 5,33 | |
| Pueblo Nuevo, Bolívar (10°44′22″N 75°15′35″W) | HUA175331 | Leaves | 14,44 | |
| Pueblo Nuevo, Bolívar (10°44′N 75°15′W) | HUA175328 | Calyces | 16,05 | |
| Túrbaco, Bolívar (10°19′55″N 75°24′51″W) | HUA196871 | Bark | 9,20 |
All extracts were obtained by maceration with ethanol 96% and concentrated in a rotaryevaporator. The yields were calculated as: [Dry Concentrated Extract (g)/Dry Material (g)] × 100. N.D.: Not determined.
Evaluation of the cell viability and NO inhibition potential of extracts obtained from Colombian Caribbean Coast plants on LPS-stimulated RAW 264.7 macrophages.
| Plant | Concentration (µg/mL) | % Cell viability | % Nitrite inhibition | Rank | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 100 | 100 ± 6.70** | 45.11 ± 4.50 | ++ | |
| 2 | 100 | 99.10 ± 1.23*** | 33.48 ± 2.29 | + | |
| 3 | 100 | 100 ± 8.91*** | 33.15 ± 2.69 | + | |
| 4 | 50 | 86.56 ± 1.66*** | 97.05 ± 2.15 | +++ | |
| 5 | 100 | 98.48 ± 0.63*** | 70.47 ± 0.81 | +++ | |
| 6 | 100 | 96.45 ± 0.65*** | 7.23 ± 1.52 | – | |
| 7 | 100 | 102.11 ± 1.61*** | 41.07 ± 2.12 | ++ | |
| 8 | 100 | 100 ± 0.81*** | 56.06 ± 1.74 | ++ | |
| 9 | 25 | 93.84 ± 1.41*** | 91.94 ± 1.97 | +++ | |
| 10 | 100 | 96.65 ± 0.60*** | 9.23 ± 1.89 | – | |
| 11 | 1400W | 2.50 | 100 ± 1.59*** | 83.88 ± 1.07 | +++ |
The cell viability was measured using the MTT assay and the NO• inhibition was assessed with the Griess assay as described in Methods. Extracts were classified by their activity as highly active (IR ≥ 60%, +++), moderately active (60%>IR ≥ 40%, ++), weakly active (40%>IR ≥ 20%, +), and inactive (IR ≤ 20%, −). 1400 W: N-(3-(aminomethyl) benzyl)acetamidine. Each value represents mean ± SEM (n = 8) from at least two independent experiments.*P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001 compared with control group (One way ANOVA).
Assessment of the LC50, IC50 (NO), and SI of the extracts with the highest NO inhibition potential among the tested plants group.
| Plant | LC50 ± confidence intervals (µg/mL) | IC50 ± confidence intervals (µg/mL) | SI | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 113.907 (97.537–131.361) | 7.097 (6.229–8.199) | 16.05 | |
| 2 | >100 | 43.442 (41.748–45.136) | >2.30 | |
| 4 | 130.628 (114.505–144.937) | 4.063 (3.541–4.665) | 32.15 | |
The cell viability was measured using the MTT assay and the NO inhibition was assessed with the Griess assay as described in Methods. IC50 and LC50 were calculated with non-linear regression and expressed as mean and its 95% confidence interval (n = 8) from at least two independent experiments.
Evaluation of the NO inhibition potential of fractions obtained from Physalis angulata calyces on LPS-stimulated RAW 264.7.
| Concentration (µg/mL) | % Nitrite inhibition | Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Ether (EF) | 75 | 42.897 ± 1.791 | ++ |
| 2 | Dichloromethane (DF) | 25 | 97.079 ± 0.494 | +++ |
| 3 | Methanol (MF) | 75 | 49.232 ± 1.138 | + |
The cell viability was measured using the MTT assay and the NO inhibition was assessed with the Griess assay. Fractions were classified by their activity as highly active (IR ≥ 60%, +++), moderately active (60%>IR ≥ 40%, ++), weakly active (40%>IR ≥ 20%, +), and inactive (IR ≤ 20%, −). Each value represents mean ± SEM (n = 8) from at least two independent experiments. *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001 compared with control group (One way ANOVA)
Fig. 1In vivo evaluation of the anti-inflammatory effect of the extract and fractions obtained from the calyces of P. angulata in the TPA-induced mice ear edema. TE(1): Total extract (1 mg/ear), EF(1): Ether fraction (1 mg/ear), MF(1): Methanol fraction (1 mg/ear), DF(1): Dichloromethane fraction (1 mg/ear), DF(0,5): Dichloromethane fraction (0,5 mg/ear), Indo: Indomethacin. (A): Ear weight difference (mg) and inflammation inhibition percentage, circular 6 mm diameter sections of both treated and non-treated ear were weighted. (B): Enzymatic activity measured in ear tissue homogenized expressed as MPO units/mg tissue. Each value represents mean ± S.E.M. (n = 6) from at least two independent experiments. *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001 compared with TPA group (One way ANOVA). &&&P < 0,001 compared with Control group (One way ANOVA).
Fig. 2Histology samples from the TPA-induced ear edema test, ear tissue was dehydrated, embedded in paraffin and stained with Hematoxylin-Eosin. All pictures were taken in an Axio Lab A1 microscope (Zeiss, Oberkochen, Germany) and correspond to the 10X zoom. (A) Control group, (B) TPA group, (C) Indomethacin (0,5 mg/ear), (D) TE (1 mg/ear), (E) EF (1 mg/ear), (F) MF (1 mg/ear), (G) DF (1 mg/ear) and (H) DF (0,5 mg/ear).
Fig. 3Effect of the dichloromethane fraction (DF) on the production of pro-inflammatory mediators by LPS-stimulated RAW 264.7 macrophages. (A): NO•, (B): PGE2, (C): IL-1 β, (D): IL-6, (E): TNF-α, (F): MCP-1. Cells were incubated for 24 hours after stimulation and treatment with DF. Then supernatants were collected and mediators were measured through ELISA kits, except the NO• which was measured with the Griess reaction, as described in Methods. Each value represents mean ± SEM (n = 6). *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001 compared with LPS group (One way ANOVA).
Phytochemical characterization of the dichloromethane fraction obtained from the total ethanolic extract of the calyces of Physalis angulata.
| Metabolite | |
|---|---|
| Flavonoids | − |
| Terpenes and/or steroids | ++ |
| Quinones | − |
| Glycosides | +++ |
| Steroidal core | ++ |
| Alkaloids | − |
| Tannins | − |
(−) Not detected, (+) Weak presence, (++) Moderate presence and (+++) Strong presence.