Literature DB >> 31762549

Clinical Instructors' Experiences Working with and Assessing Students Who Perform below Expectations in Physical Therapy Clinical Internships.

Olivia W So1, Rachael Shaw1, Liam O'Rourke1, Jacob T Woldegabriel1, Brittany Wade1, Martine Quesnel1, Brenda Mori1.   

Abstract

Purpose: Clinical education is an integral component of the curriculum of all physical therapy (PT) entry-to-practice programmes in Canada. The literature indicates that working with and assessing students performing below expectations (SPBE) can be procedurally and emotionally difficult. Our study aimed to explore the experiences of clinical instructors (CIs) and the decision-making process involved when supervising SPBE in PT. Method: A total of 19 in-depth, semi-structured interviews were conducted with CIs, transcribed, and coded using qualitative thematic analysis.
Results: Four factors appeared to be important for CIs when they were deciding how to assess SPBE: (1) features of student performance, (2) factors related to the CIs, (3) academic and clinical facility influencers, and (4) strategies and available resources. Concerns about safety and professional behaviour, a student's clinical reasoning skills, and a lack of progression were key factors that CIs considered in recommending a final grade. CIs were more likely to recommend a failing grade if there was a series of repeated incidents rather than an isolated incident. Conclusions: We make several recommendations for the student, CI, and facilities to consider to better support and facilitate the process of working with SPBE in PT clinical education. © Canadian Physiotherapy Association.

Keywords:  clinical competence; health education; health educators; practice guideline; qualitative research

Year:  2019        PMID: 31762549      PMCID: PMC6855354          DOI: 10.3138/ptc-2018-0081

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Physiother Can        ISSN: 0300-0508            Impact factor:   1.037


  33 in total

Review 1.  The assessment of professional competence: building blocks for theory development.

Authors:  C P M van der Vleuten; L W T Schuwirth; F Scheele; E W Driessen; B Hodges
Journal:  Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol       Date:  2010-05-26       Impact factor: 5.237

2.  Failure to fail: the perspectives of clinical supervisors.

Authors:  Nancy L Dudek; Meridith B Marks; Glenn Regehr
Journal:  Acad Med       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 6.893

3.  Failure to fail: facing the consequences of inaction.

Authors:  Julie Scholes; John Albarran
Journal:  Nurs Crit Care       Date:  2005 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.325

4.  Precepting an unsafe student: the role of the faculty.

Authors:  Florence Luhanga; Olive Yonge; Florence Myrick
Journal:  Nurse Educ Today       Date:  2007-06-05       Impact factor: 3.442

5.  Is it me or is it them? Factors that influence the passing of underperforming students.

Authors:  Jennifer A Cleland; Lynn V Knight; Charlotte E Rees; Susan Tracey; Christine M Bond
Journal:  Med Educ       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 6.251

6.  To pass or to fail? Understanding the factors considered by faculty in the clinical evaluation of nursing students.

Authors:  Jacqueline Kayler DeBrew; Lynne Porter Lewallen
Journal:  Nurse Educ Today       Date:  2013-06-14       Impact factor: 3.442

7.  Failing a student nurse: a new horizon of moral courage.

Authors:  Sharon Black; Joan Curzio; Louise Terry
Journal:  Nurs Ethics       Date:  2013-08-28       Impact factor: 2.874

8.  Why are nurse mentors failing to fail student nurses who do not meet clinical performance standards?

Authors:  Anne Jervis; Mary Tilki
Journal:  Br J Nurs       Date:  2011 May 13-26

9.  Factors influencing healthcare service quality.

Authors:  Ali Mohammad Mosadeghrad
Journal:  Int J Health Policy Manag       Date:  2014-07-26

Review 10.  'Failure to fail' in nursing - A catch phrase or a real issue? A systematic integrative literature review.

Authors:  Lynda J Hughes; Marion Mitchell; Amy N B Johnston
Journal:  Nurse Educ Pract       Date:  2016-06-29       Impact factor: 2.281

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.